Crime and Deviance - theorists Flashcards
(94 cards)
Durkheim (1947)
Structural consensus theories explaing crime and deviance
Functionalist
Crime is innevitable
Not everyone can be intergrated into the norms and values of society. These individuals can remind others of the importance of social solidarity where people have a sense of the importance of the social group they are in
For example when someone commits a crime and is punished it serves a reminder for others of the boundaries of society
Without this form of boundary maintenance crime rates migh increas leading to anomie
Merton (1968)
Structural consensus theories explaing crime and deviance
Functionalist
Developed ideas of Durkheim
Crime occurs as a result of the strain arising from people truing but failing to attain the goals society has set for them
Acknowledges these goals are stratified depending on a person’s starting point and that there are socially acceptable ways of achieving these goals
When people are unable to achieve their goals by these socially aceptable means they may look for alternative means some of which are criminal
Merton calls these reponses modes of adaption
Types of adaption to strain:
1. Conformity - Accept conventional means. Accept goals of society
2. Innovation - Reject conventional means. Accept goals of soceity
3. Ritualism - Accept conventional means. Reject goals of society
4. Retreatism - Reject conventional means. Reject goals of society
5. Rebellion - Accept and Reject conventional means. Reject goals of society
AO3:
- He assumes that people’s motivations for crime and individual and ignores the fact that crime often occurs in groups
- Doesn’t explain why some individuals are more likely to commit crime than others
- Do not explain why some who have achieved the goals of society still commit crime
- May not apply to the contemporary UK: there have been significant changes to UK society since these ideas were developed. The view that everyone share similar ideas of what is considered right and wrong has been challenged in recent years. New forms of crime have emerged.
Cohen (1971)
Functional subcultural theories
The young working-class felt a sense of frustration because they lacked the job oppurtunities necessary to achieve society’s goals
This is known as status frustration
Status frustration led to the development of an alternative set of values a ‘delinquent subculture’ which ran counter to the consensus values
Within this delinquent subculture deviant behaviour allowed the working class to experience an alternative form of status and respect from their peeers. For example, risk-taking behaviour (antisocial behaviour e.g. stealing) don’t help achieve sociall goals but can help achieve status within the peer group
AO3:
- This frustration may be even greater as contemporary society has becoe more materialistic and many young people may feel pressured to buy expensive items such as trainers and designer clothers e.g. riots in London 2012
Cloward and Ohlin (1961)
Functionalist subcultural theories
There are a number of responses to the strain of status frustration
There is a range of criminal subcultures such as conflict subcultures (where it is common to find violence) and retreatist subcultures
Highlights the complexity of working-class subcultures and acknowledges that crime has a social aspect
AO2:
- Conflict subcultures = violent gang
- Retreatist subcultures = groups of young people spending time together but not interacting with other groups such as those sharing a particular interest in a type of music
AO3:
- Ignoes that people are not permanently within these subcultures and can move in and out of them
Matza (1964)
Functionalist subcultural theories
Criticises other functionalist subcultural theories for suggesting a deliquent is somehow different to other people
People belonging to such subcultures use techniques of neutralisation justiying their behaviours by removing themselves from taking any responsivilty for the act
There is a process of delinquency and drift whereby individuals are not in a permant state of delinquency rather that they drift in and out of being a delinquent before they are settled and established as adults in mainstream society
Suggests that the lack of commitment that young people have makes it possible for them to feel that they can take larger risks
Refers to this set of values based on deviant behaviour as subterranean values and says they are particularly attractive to certain members of the workng class
Lyng (1990)
Functionalist subcultural theories
Younger people commit crimes in order to take risks and experience excitement
Calls this kind of crime edgework
Idea of edgework challenges the notion that there is some form of structural cause of crime among young people
Suggests that crime might simply be committed for the thrill and risk and the criminal may or may not be experiencing frustration, marginalisation or social exclusion
AO2: Structural causes of crime
- Urban explorers = Bradley Garett, sneaks into London landmarks at night
Murray (1989)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
There are a group of people who don’t work and whose values run counter to the rest of society - the underclass
This underclass is responsible for a large proportion of crime
An overly generous state has led to people becoming reliant on welfare benefits which in turn encourage people to turn to crime rather than go to work and earn money
AO3:
- Left realists criticise for the New Right e.g. Murray failing to see that some people experience structural inequalities from which they cannot escape
Snider (1993)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
Marxist
Laws still do not curb the interests of big businesses
This means that either legislation is not written to stop massive amounts of profit being made by the wealthy or that laws are written in such a way as to allow the rich to avoid them
Big business are important and necessary within capitalist society and therefore they are given certain concessions which benefit them
AO2:
- Rich avoid paying taxes
- Banks given concessions that benefit them = controversially pay their senior staff huge bonuses despite some being part-owned by the state e.g. cse of The Royal Bank of Scotland which was controversially given government-based financial assistance
Chambliss (1973)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
Calls the conscious decision to avoid creating laws and regulations for the wealthy **non-decision making **
Taylor, Walton, and Young (1973)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
The New Criminology
6 factors involved in understanding crime:
1. The particular way in which wealth and power are distributed within society
2. The context in which the individual decides to commit a crime
3. The meaning that the individual attaches to the act
4. The ways in which others in soicety react to the deviant act
5. The impact of label of deviant on the individual
6. All factors need to be understood in order to get a fully deviant theory of crime
AO3:
- Criticised for failing to examine the impact of gender and ethnicity
Stuart Hall (1978)
Attempted to address some of the issues of The New Criminology (Taylor, Walton, Young 1973) through his fully social theory of deviance
Attempts to explore how crimes are blown up to distract people from economic problems caused by capitalism and turn attention away from structural causes of inequality
Hall’s study, Policing the Crisis (1978) focused on a moral panic surrounding Britain in the 1970s
The wider origins of the deviant act
- The 1970s was a period of social crisis in Britain, the result of an international downturn in capitalist economies
The immediate origins of the deviant act
- This crisis was shown in many inner-city riots as wwell as conflict in Northern Ireland and disatisfaction generally expressed through strikes. The government was searching for a group to scapegoat
The actual act
- Migging, which according to police was more likely to be carried out by African Caribbeans
The immediate origins of social reaction
- Media outrage at the extent of muggings linking to racism among the Metropolitan Police (and wider racism in society)
The wider origins of social reaction
- The need to find scapegoat and the ease with which young men from African Caribbean backgrounds could be blamed
The outcome of social reaction on the deviants’ further action
- A sense of of injustice among ethnic minorities and a loss of confidence by ethnic minority communities in the criminal justice system
The nature of the deviant processes as a whole
- The real causes of crime were not addressed and were effectively hidden by the criminal justice system
AO3:
- Traditional marxists criticise this and argue that the new criminology is too removed from the marxist tradition
- Feminist criminologists argue that the new criminologu has continued the omission of women from Criminological discussion ignoring the power of the patriarchy in the analysis
- Left realists (e.g. Young) argue new criminology tends to romanticise the view of crimials seeing them as fighting against the system
Miller 1961
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
Argues that a unique predominantly male working-class subculture characcterised by focal concerns has long existed. These relate to behaviour which is seen as particularly important within these subcultures tougness and masculinity, hostility towards authority, risk-taking behaviour and rule-breaking
There is a continual drive to be the dominant figure within the subculture by showing the strongers focal concerns
Sutherland (1960)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
Supported the idea that crime is a product of social interactions clamingint that differential association leads to criminal behaviour
People who associate with other criminals throughout their early life will behan to learn how to commit crimes and see a criminal lifestyle as normal and acceptable
Hayward (2006)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
There is a strong relationship between consumer culture and youth crime
Crime is marketed through branded goods especially to young people whose identity in soceity is linked to the possession of particular products
Designer goods (e.g. particular items of clothes and jewellery) have become synonymous with risk-taking behaviour and deviant lifestyle
Major companies design marketing compaigns that seem to promote resistance to ebstalished culture (e.g. graffiti-style placing of logos)
Suggests this practice of brandalism contributes to social control of young people offering a discussion of crime that is concerned with status frustration
Becker (1963)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Key figure in labelling theory
- An act only becomes deviant when others perceives and defines it as such
- Whether or not deviant label is applied depends on societal reaction
- Calls groups who have power and resources to create or enforce rules and impose their definition of deviance (mass media, police force) moral entrepreneurs
- Agencies of social control use discretion and selective judgement in deciding how or whether to deal with illegal/deviant behaviour leading to** selective law enforcement**
- Police operate with pre-existing stereotypical categories of what constitutes ‘trouble’ and these factors influence their response to behaviour they encounter
- Action taken reflects the stereotypes they hold rather than reality
Lemert (1972)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Distinguishes between primary and secondary deviance
- Primary deviance = deviance that hasn’t been publically labelled as a crime
- Secondary deviance = once an offender is discovered and publicly exposed and the label of deviance is attached
Cicourel (1968)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Found that officers’ assumptions led them to concentrate on certain types of people
- Typically the working-class
- Resulted in law enforcement showing a class bias
- Leads police to patrol working-class areas more intensively resulting in more arrests and conforming their stereotypes
- Other agenst of social control within the criminal justice system reinforced this bias (Example, Probation officers held the common sense theory that juvenile delinquency was caused by poverty therefore they saw youth from such backgrounds as likely to offend in the future and were less likely to support alternative punishments for them)
- Justice isn’t fixed but negotioable. Example, when a middle-class youth was arrested he was less likely to be charged this is because his background didn’t fit in the idea of police’s typical delinquentand because his parents were more likely to negotiate successfully on his behalf convincing the control agencies that he was sorry and they would monitor him resulting in typically him being counselled warned and released not punished
- We should investigate the processes that create the police statistics
Lea and Young (1984)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- 3 causes of crime
1. Relative deprivation - Refers to how people regarded their position in relation to others that cause crime, not deprivation
2. Subcultures - of various types form among the working-class who may begin to see offending behaviour as normal
3. Marginalisation - is the process through which some find themselves on the edges of society and unable to access rights and services available. This in turn leads to crime becoming seen as more acceptable
Braithwaite and Drahos (2000)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Labelling theory need not just be applied to people but also more broadly to the environment
- Example, they argue that crimes against the environment ought to be re-identified as harm to ensure that any legally acceptable form of behaviour which is damaging to the environment is punished
- This is much more of an effective way of understanding crime than through laws alone
Murray (1984)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- New Right
- Claimed breakdown of other institutions in socity such as the family along with an over generous welfare state leads to children being inadequately socialised
- Lack of strong male role models leads young children to be more likely to commut crimes
Lea and Young (1984)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Left realist thinkers
- Crime is a product of structural inequalities as well as the way people perceive these inequalities
- Draw attention to the fact that it is the working class who are most likely to be the victims of crime
Wilson (1985, 75)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- To reduce the effects of crime on people’s lives solutions to crime need to be clearly defined and acted upon
- Best way to deter people from committing crimes was increasing the perception of the risk of getting caught for a crime before and after the event
Wilson and Kelling (1982)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Right realists
- Argue for a tough stance with small offences - a zero tolerance approach to crime
- Claim that multiple small scale crimes lead to a growing sense of a breakdown in social order which contributes to a sense of social disorder where crime is possible
- Known as broken window thesis whereby small visible signs of crime need switf and harsh punitive action
Felson (1998)
Crime, deviance, social order, and social control
- Right realist
- Posits that 3 things must occur
1. A motivated offender
2. A suitable target
3. An absence of the police/authority figure - Believes members of the public work far better at preventing crime than the police as they may have a greater understanding of the criminal’s background
- To reduce crime these 3 things must be tackled