Criminal Justice Act 1988 Evaluation Flashcards

(22 cards)

1
Q

What act and section number do assault and battery come under?

A

S.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What offences come under S.39 Criminal Justice Act 1988?

A

Assault
Battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the POL from R vs Lamb?

A

No fear = No assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What case states that no fear = no assault?

A

R vs Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the POL from Tuberville vs Savage?

A

Words can cancel an assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What case states that words can cancel an assault?

A

Tuberville vs Savage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the POL from Smith vs Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station?

A

Fearing the possibility of immediate force is enough for assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What case states that fearing the possibility of immediate force is enough for assault?

A

Smith vs Chief Superintendent of Woking Police Station

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the POL from R vs Ireland?

A

Silent phone calls can constitute a assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case states that silent phone calls can constitute an assault?

A

R vs Ireland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the POL from R vs Mohan?

A

Direct intention is where the offence was D’s aim or purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the case for direct intention?

A

R vs Mohan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the POL from R vs Cunningham?

A

Cunningham Recklessness - Did the D foresee there was a risk but take it anyway

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the POL from R vs Thomas?

A

Touching clothes can be a battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the POL from R vs Haystead?

A

A battery can be an indirect act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the POL from R vs Braham?

A

Battery can arise even when D thought their actions were affectionate

17
Q

What is the POL from R vs Venna?

A

Recklessness is a sufficient MR for battery

18
Q

What is the first AO3 point for a Criminal Justice Act 1988 Essay?

A

Problems with modernness - Tuberville vs Savage - No-one carries swords around with them anymore and can words now actually cancel an assault?

19
Q

What is the second AO3 point for a Criminal Justice Act 1988 Essay?

A

Ambiguous definition - ‘apprehension of immediate force’ - creates problems with immediacy and what situations can count as immediate - R vs Ireland + R vs Constanza + Smith vs CSIWPS can lead to unfair and confusing outcomes

20
Q

What is the third AO3 point for a Criminal Justice Act 1988 Essay?

A

Is it fair that assault and battery have the same max sentence when battery includes a touch and assault doesn’t

21
Q

What is the final AO3 point for a Criminal Justice Act 1988 Essay?

A

Development through case law - R vs Haystead - that a battery can be indirect is good as it has moved with society however is undemocratic

22
Q

What are the reforms for a Criminal Justice Act 1988 Essay

A

Reforms - Law Commission Report 2015 recommended that battery changes to physical assault and assault changes to threatened assault to improve clarity. The MR would stay the same and an additional offence of aggravated assault would be added when there is some injury