criminal law Flashcards

1
Q

what is criminal law

A

wrong doing against an individual,society and the state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how are crimes defined

A

act of parliament or by the way of cases are stated

d conduct must match the definition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is Actus Reus

A

Action ( of comminting the act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the mens rea?

A

the thinking or intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

who is the burden of proof on

A

the claimant have to prove the d

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is the standard of proof

A

beyond reasonable doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Actus Reas

A

it is the postive voluntary act (Hill v Baxter)

no liability no act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are the liabilities by ommisions

A
statutory 
contractual
relationship 
voluntary 
official postion
chain of events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is contractual

A

Pittwood

railway keeper =guilty of manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is public postion

A

R v Dytham

misconduct in public office

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is chain of events

A

R v Miller

convicted of arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is volunatry assumed duty of care

A

R v Evans ( heroin)

R v Dobinsinson (eating disorder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is statutory duty

A

offence of neglect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is relationship

A

R v Gibbons and Proctor

daughter starved

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what is causation

A

prosectution must prove that d conduct was factual and legal cause of consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factual Causation

A

“But For”
the d acts would the consequences occur
r v white (posion mum)
r v pagett (shootout )

17
Q

legal causation

A

operating + substantive cause
may be more than one act that contributes to consequence
r v kimsey

18
Q

Thin skull rule

A

take your victim as you find them.

R v Blaue

19
Q

What is the case of R v Blaue

A

thin skull rule ( didnt accept blood transfusion )

20
Q

Intervening acts

A

there must be a direct link between d act and the consequence
- act of third party
- victims own act
R v jordan (allergic but carried on giving tabs )

21
Q

R v Cheshire
R v Malcherek
are cases for what

A

Interventing acts

22
Q

what is victim own act case

A

R v Roberts (jumped out car) = didnt reasonbly foresee

R v Marjom (hotel jumped) reasonably foreseeable

23
Q

what case breaks the chain for victim own act

A

William ( jumped out for wallet)

there was no threat

24
Q

Direct intention

A

Woollin

25
Q

oblique or indirect intention

A

consequence was not the aim of d

hancook v shankland

26
Q

Moloney what happened

A

it creates precedent

it was an oblique intent as they were drunk and accidently shot his dad

27
Q

3 levels of mens rea?

A

direct
oblique
recklesss

28
Q

what is recklessness

A

d knows that there is a risk of consequences occur but still take the risk

29
Q

cases for recklessness

A

caldwell

cunningham

30
Q

transferred malice

A

is when the mens rea is transferred from intended victim to actual

31
Q

cases for transferred malice

A

pembliton (object-object)
latimer
mitchell (old man falls)

32
Q

coinsidence of ar + mr

A

when the ar and the mr must be present

fagan v mpc (drove on foot )

33
Q

Strict liability

A

mens rea is not required
actus reas is voluntary

pharmaeustical society of great brittan