Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Bar Prep > Criminal Law > Flashcards

Criminal Law Flashcards

(62 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

A state acquires jurisdiction over a crime if either ____ or ___ happened in that state

A

conduct OR result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Merger:
__ and ___ do merge into the substantive offense.

__ does NOT merge into substantive offense

A

solicitation AND attempt

Conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An act can be any bodily movement that is voluntary. What are examples that DO NOT qualify

A

Conduct which is not a product of own volition;
a reflexive or convulsive;
unconscious or asleep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

omission of an act - 5 circumstances that gives rise to legal duty to act

A 
by statute;
by contract;
by relationship;
you voluntarily assume a duty of care and fail to adequately perform it;
your conduct created the peril
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

4 common law mental states of a crime

A

specific intent crimes;
malice crimes;
general intent crimes;
strict liability crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

specific intent crimes- list them

“Students Can Always Fake A Laugh, Even For Ridiculous Bar Facts”

A 
Solicitation (inchoate)
Conspiracy (inchoate)
Attempt (inchoate)
First degree murder
Assault
Larceny
Embezzlement
False pretenses
Robbery
Burglary
Forgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What 2 additional defenses do specific intent crimes qualify for?

A

voluntary intoxication and unreasonable mistake of fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Malice crimes- what 2 crimes

A

murder and arseny

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

general intent - 2 most commonly tested

A

rape and battery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strict liability- “no intent crimes”- any defense that negates intention cannot be a defense to the no intent crimes of strict liability

if the crime is in the administrative, regulatory, or morality area and you don’t see any adverbs in the statute ___, ___ or __ then no intent crime of strict liability

A

willfully, knowingly, intentionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

mental states and the model penal codes

purposefully: one acts purposefully when it is his __ to engage in a certain conduct or cause a certain result
knowingly: one acts knowingly when he is __ that his conduct will very likely cause the result
recklessly: one acts recklessly when he __a __and __risk
negligently: one acts negligently when he fails to be aware of a __and __ risk.

A

purposefully- conscious objective

knowingly: aware
recklessly: consciously disregards, substantial and unjustifiable
negligently: substantial and unjustifiable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Accomplice is one who __, __ or __ the principal in the commission of the crime charged.

Must have the requisite __ that the crime be committed

Accomplices are liable for __ and all other __

A

aids, advises, encourages

intent

the crime itself and all other foreseeable crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Accomplice to withdraw

if encouraged then must __

if aided then must __

alternate means of withdrawing is __

A

repudiate

neutralize the assistance

contact the police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Inchoate offenses means incomplete: 3 types

A

solicitation, attempt, conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

solicitation rule

A

solicitation is asking someone to commit a crime. The crime of solicitation ends when you ask them.
Under common law, it is NOT necessary that the person solicited agrees to commit the crime
Factual impossibility is NOT a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Conspiracy rule

A

conspiracy is an agreement with an intent to agree and an intent to pursue a unlawful objective

Agreement need not be express the intent can be inferred from conduct

Factual impossibility is NOT a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

co-conspirators liability

A

liable for all crimes in FURTHERANCE of the conspiracy and that are FORSEEABLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Bilateral v unilateral approach in conspiracy

A

bilateral- traditional common law requires two guilty parties

unilateral- modern (MPC) requires only that one person have a genuine criminal intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Overt act requirement

majority v minority rule

A

majority- must be an agreement plus some overt act (any little act/ mere preparation)

minority- common law rule grounded liability for conspiracy with the agreement itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

withdrawal of conspiracy

A

can NEVER relieve D for liability for conspiracy but can withdraw from subsequent crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Attempt rule

A

specific intent plus over act (substantial in furtherance of the commission of the crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Attempt defenses

Abandonment

legal impossibility

factual impossibility

A

majority rule- once D has taken substantial steps toward committing the crime abandonment is NEVER a defense
MPC- must be fully voluntary and a complete renunciation of criminal purpose

legal impossibility- is a defense

factual impossibility NEVER a defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Insanity defense 4 trigger phrases

A

M’Naughten rule;
Irresistible impulse
Durham Rule
MPC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Insanity:

M’Naughten Rule

A

at the time of his conduct D lacked the ability to know the wrongfulness of his actions or understand the nature and quality of his actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Insanity: | Irresistible impulse
D lacked the capacity for self control and free choice
26
insanity: | Durham rule
D's conduct was a product of a mental illness
27
insanity: | MPC
D lacked the ability to conform his conduct to the requirements of law
28
voluntary intoxication is a defense on the bar exam only to __
specific intent crimes
29
Involuntary intoxication (unknowingly intoxicated or becoming intoxicated under duress). This is a form or __ and is a defense to __
insanity and a defense to ALL crimes
30
Infancy under 7 then __ under age 14 then __
no criminal liability | rebuttal presumption of no criminal liability
31
self defense: Non deadly force-
a victim may use non-deadly self-defense any time the victim REASONABLY BELIEVES that force is about to be used on him
32
self defense: Deadly force- Majority v minority
Majority- may use deadly force in self defense anytime victim reasonably believes that DEADLY FORCES IS ABOUT TO BE USED ON HIM Minority- required to retreat if possible (no duty to retreat from home, rape or robbery, or if an officer)
33
original aggressor and self defense
to get back the defense of self defense, the original aggressor must WITHDRAW and COMMUNICATE THAT WITHDRAWAL
34
defense of others and self defense
D can raise a defense of others defense if he reasonably believes that the person assisted would have had the right to use force in his own defense; Need NOT be a special relationship
35
Defense of dwelling rule
Deadly force may NEVER be used solely to defend your property
36
Duress rule
Duress is a defense to a criminal act if: the person acts under the threat of imminent infliction of death or great bodily harm and the belief is reasonable; Threats to third person may also suffice Duress is a defense to all crimes EXCEPT HOMICIDE
37
Necessity defense
conduct that would otherwise be criminal is justifiable if as a result of pressure from natural forces D reasonably believes that his conduct was necessary to avoid a greater societal harm
38
Mistake of fact is a defense only when the mistake ___ the mistake has to be ___to be a defense to a malice or general intent crime but on exam any mistake no matter how ridiculous is a defense for ___ it is NEVER a defense to ___
negates intention reasonable specific intent crimes strict liability crimes
39
entrapment is a valid defense only if:
the criminal design originated with law enforcement officers and the D must not have been predisposed to commit the crime
40
Battery rule (general intent crime)
unlawful application of force to the person resulting in either bodily injury or offensive touching Need not be intentional forced need not be applied directly voluntary intoxication and unreasonable mistake NOT a defense
41
Assault rule
an attempt to commit a battery or intentional creation- other than by mere words- of a reasonable apprehension of imminent bodily harm
42
aggravated assault
assault plus: the use of a deadly or dangerous weapon OR with the intent to rape, make or murder
43
Homicide: Murder
murder is the unlawful killing of another human being with malice forethought. Intent to kill; or intent to inflict great bodily harm; or intent to commit a felony; or reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life
44
Homicide; cause in fact proximate cause
death would not have occurred but for D's conduct D is responsible for all results that occurs a natural & probable consequence of his conduct
45
first degree murder- premeditated
victim must be human & dead; D must have acted with intent or knowledge
46
felony murder
any killing even accidental committed in course of a felony; defense to underlying felony is defense to felony murder deaths must be foreseeable includes fleeing doesn't include the death of co-felon once D reaches point of temporary safety deaths thereafter are NOT felony murders
47
Homicide of officer
the d must know the victim is an officer and he must be acting in the line of duty
48
2nd degree murder (depraved heart killing)
killing with reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life
49
manslaughter voluntary involuntary
voluntary- killing in the heat of passion resulting from an adequate provocation by the victim; provocation must be one that would arouse sudden and intense passion in the mind of an ordinary person; must not be sufficient time to cool off involuntary- killing of criminal negligence or misdemeanor manslaughter (unenumerated felony)
50
imperfect self defense
D has a honest but unreasonable belief that his life was in imminent danger
51
false imprisonment rule
unlawful confinement of a person w/o his valid consent; known alternate route is available or consent then no false imprisonment
52
kidnapping rule
confinement of a person w/ either some movement or concealment in a secret place
53
rape
slightest penetration completes the crime of rape
54
statutory rape is strict liability
consent of victim and mistake of fact are NOT defenses
55
Larceny rule
common law larceny requires wrongful taking a carrying away (asportation) of property of another by trespass w/ intent to permanently deprive slightest movement of property is sufficient intent to deprive permanently must exist at time of the taking.. later decides to keep it then larceny under theory of continuing trespass taking property in the belief that it is yours is NOT common law larceny
56
embezzlement
the fraudulent conversion of property of another embezzler always has lawful possession followed by illegal conversion; typically a trustee; don't have to carry away or get the benefit to embezzle
57
false pretenses
D persuades the owner of property to convey title by fall pretense (false rep) conveyance of title -center of false pretense can be as to a present or past fact false promise to do something in future not false pretense
58
robbery
the taking of personal property of another from the other person's presence by force or threat with the intent to permanently deprive him of it threat must be of imminent harm
59
extortion
knowingly seeking to obtain property or services by means of a future threat don't have to take anything to be extortion
60
forgery
the making or altering of a false writing with intent to defraud; any writing that has apparent legal significance is subject to crime of forgery
61
burglary
breaking and entering of a dwelling of another at night with the intent to commit a felony therein breaking can be actual (some force) or constructive (breaking by fraud or threat) entering occurs when any part of the body crosses into the house CANNOT be a barn or commercial structure with the intent to commit a felony therein at the time of the breaking or entering
62
arson
the malicious burning of the dwelling of another No specific intent required can be reckless indifference Scorching is NOT sufficient CHARRING IS SUFFICIENT Cannot be a barn or building

Bar Prep (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions