Criminal Law Flashcards
(27 cards)
How is a legal duty to act created?
Contract, status relationship, statute, voluntary assumption of care, creation of peril
What 3 requirements must be satisfied for an omission to give rise to criminal liability?
Legal duty to act
Awareness of facts giving rise to duty
Ability to help
Common law mental states
- Specific intent
- Malice
- General intent
- Strict liabilit
Define specific intent
crime requires not just desire to do act but desire to achieve a specific result
What are the 11 specific intent crimes?
Crimes against the person - Assault - 1st degree premeditated murder Property crimes - Larceny - Embezzlement - False pretenses - Robbery - Forgery - Burglary Inchoate crimes - Solicitation - Conspiracy - Attempt
Common law defenses to specific intent crime
- Unreasonable mistake of fact
2. Voluntary intoxication
Malice definition and crimes
when D acts intentionally or with reckless disregard of obvious or known risk
- Murder
- Arson
General intent definition and crimes
D need only be generally aware of factors constituting crime; need not intend a specific result
D can usually infer general intent from doing of the crime
- battery
- forcible rape
- false imprisonment
- kidnapping
Strict liability definition and crimes
Crime just requires doing the act; no mental state requirement
- Regulatory crimes implicating public health
- Statutory rape
New York mental states (5)
- Intent – when it is D’s conscious desire to achieve result
- Knowledge – when D is aware of what he is doing and result is practically certain to arise from his conduct
- Recklessness – when D is aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk and consciously disregards it
- Negligence – when D should have been aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk
- Strict liability – no mental states required
Causation requirement
Actual Cause - D is actual cause (cause-in-fact). Bad result wouldn’t have happened but for D’s act
Proximate Cause - D is proximate cause if bad result is natural and probable result of D’s behavior
Common law battery elements
- Unlawful application of force to another resulting in bodily injury or offensive touching
- Mental state: general intent
Common law assault elements
a. Intentional creation other than by mere words of a reasonable apprehension of imminent bodily harm
b. Mental state: specific intent
NY assault elements
- Intentionally causing physical injury to another person
New York 2nd Degree Assault
Intentionally causing serious physical injury to another person
(1st Degree: 2nd degree + a weapon)
(3rd Degree: non-serious physical injury)
What is malice aforethought? How do you satisfy this with mental state?
i. Intent to kill
ii. Intent to inflict serious bodily harm
iii. Extreme recklessness (reckless indifference to human life)
iv. Intentional commission of an inherently dangerous felony
Common law timing of homicide
death must occur within 1 yr and 1 day of homicidal act. In NY can occur at any time
Requirements for NY non-slayer defense
a. Did not kill victim
b. D did not have deadly weapon
c. D had no reason to believe co-felons had deadly weapons, AND
d. D had no reason to believe his co-felons intended to do anything that was likely to result in death
Elements of First Degree murder in NY
- Intent to kill and
- D is more than 18 yrs old and
- At least one aggravating factor:
a. Victim is law enforcement engaged in official duties at time of killing
b. D committed murder for hire
c. Felony murder where V intentionally killed
d. Killing for purpose of witness intimidation
e. More than one V intentionally killed in same criminal transaction
Second Degree murder in NY
- Intentional killing that doesn’t qualify for 1st degree
- Highly reckless killing demonstrating depraved indifference to human life by engaging in conduct creating a “grave risk” of death (generally more than one victim. With one victim you need torture)
- Felony murder where V is not co-felon and is killed unintentionally
Common law voluntary manslaughter
- Intentional killing committed in heat of passion upon adequate provocation
4 requirements:
a. Provocation was objectively adequate (sudden and intense passion aroused in mind of reasonable person) – words alone inadequate
b. D was actually provoked
c. D did not have time to cool off
d. D did not actually cool off
Extreme Emotional Disturbance in NY
a. An intentional killing committed under influence of reasonable and extreme emotional disturbance
b. EED is affirmative defense to 2nd Degree murder, so D must prove EED by preponderance of evidence
NY 2nd degree manslaughter
recklessness. D is aware of and consciously disregards substantial and unjustifiable risk of death
NY 1st degree manslaughter
EED manslaughter and an intent to cause serious physical injury