Criminal Law Fatal Offences Flashcards

(21 cards)

1
Q

Murder is a common law offence so their is no specific legislation defining it, a seventeenth century judge Lord Coke defined murder as

A

The unlawful killing of a reasonable creature in being under the Kings peace with malice aforethought, express or implied.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the actus reus of murder

A

The victim was killed
As reasonable creature in being
Under the kings peace
The killing was unlawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can an omission amount to the murder

A

Yes, murder is a result crime ,the defendant cannot be guilty unless his act or ommission caused the death of the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In murder, omission is only sufficient for the actus reus where there is a duty to act, what are the four main situations when such duty can exist

A

A contractual duty- Pittwood (1902)
A duty because of a relationship- Gibbins and Proctor (1918)
A. Duty taken on voluntarily - Stone and Dobinson (1977)
A duty which arises becauuse the defendant has set in motion a chain of events - Miller (1983)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

For the first actus reus element of murder, does the killing have to be unlawful

A

The killing must be unlawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does a reasonable creature in being mean

A

A human being

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Is a foetus considered a reasonable creature in being

A

The child has to have an ‘existence independent from the mother’ for it to be considered a reasonable creature in being
Attorney-Generals Reference (no 3 of 1994) (1997)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is it probable that a person who is ‘brain dead’ would not be considered as a reasonable creature in being, why is this

A

Doctors need to be able to turn off life support machine without being liable for homicide
Malcharek (1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the year and a day rule and does it still apply today

A

A person cannot be punished fro causing someone’s death if it happened more than a year and a day after their act
Was abolished in 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does under the kings peace mean

A

The killing of an enemy in the course of war it is not murder, however ,the killing of a prisoner of war would be sufficient for the actus reus of murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the mens Rea of murder

A

Express malice aforethought (the intention to kill)
OR
Implied malice aforethought (the intention to cause grievous bodily harm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A person has the mens Rea of murder of they express of implied malice aforethought, this means a person can be guilty of murder even if they did not intend to kill, what case affirms this

A

Vickers (1957) confirmed in Cunningham (1981)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In murder they either have direct or oblique intent, what does this mean

A

Direct intent- the D intends that consequence
Oblique intent- the D’s aim was not to bring about the consequence, but the death or serious injury is a foreseeable result of their actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is foresight of consequence under the statutory provision of s.8 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967

A

A person in jury in determining whether a person has committed an offence must decided whether the defendant intend or foresaw that death or really serious injury be caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What cases have the House of Lords used to explain the foresight of consequence

A

Moloney (1985)
Nedrick (1986)
Woolin (1998)
Matthew’s and Alleyne (2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the current test for foresight of consequence

A

A jury may find the necessary intention if they feel sure that death or serious injury was a virtual certainty as result of the defendants actions and the defendant appreciated that such was the case

17
Q

Can a person be guilty of murder through transferred malice

A

Yes
Lamiter (1886)
Mitchell (1983)

18
Q

For a murder to occur the actus reus and mens Rea must occur at the same time what case affirms this

A

Thabo Meli v R - actus reus and mens Rea present
Church (1965)- actus reus and mens Rea not present together

19
Q

If found guilty of murder what will the defendant punishment bd

A

Aged 18 and over: life imprisonment
Aged 10-17: the judge must order there detention at his majesty’s pleasure

20
Q

What does the Criminal Justice Act 2003 guidelines on sentencing murder provide

A

A whole life sentence for serious cases like premeditated killings of multiple people, sexual or sadistic child murders or politically motivated murders.
Thirty years minimum for murders of police or prison officers murders involving firearms, sexual or sadistic killing aggravated by racial or sexual orientation.
Fifteen years minimum for murders not falling within the two higher categories

21
Q

What does the sentence for murder reflect

A

That justice has to be done as it is the most serious crime that can be committed, however as shown by previous guidelines there are different levels of fault within the crime and the minimum term can reflect that level of fault