Criminal Law Principles Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

What is actus reus?

A

the act required to commit a given crime (required for every crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How do you satisfy actus reus?

A

D must perform a VOLUNTARY physical act; a voluntary bodily movement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can omission constitute actus reus?

A

Yes (failure to act) if:

  1. D had specific legal duty to act
  2. D had knowledge of facts giving rise to the duty; and
  3. it was reasonably necessary for D to perform the duty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is mens rea?

A

the mental element required at time a crime was committed (required for every crime)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the different types of mens rea?

A
  1. specific intent
  2. general intent
  3. malice
  4. intent doesn’t matter: strict liability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is specific intent?

A

D must have the specific intent or object to commit the crime; must be proven (never inferred)

Mistake of fact and voluntary intoxication are defenses to negate SI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is general intent?

A

D must be aware of his action any attendant circumstances; may be inferred from act itself; most crimes are GI crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is malice?

A

D act w/ reckless disregard or undertakes obvious risk, from which a harmful result is expected (applies to arson and CL murder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is strict liability?

A

no mens rea is required (aka no intent or awareness needs to be proven) - arises w/ administrative and morality crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the MPC mens rea standards?

A
  1. purposely: subjective std, when conscious objective is to engage in a certain conduct and cause certain result
  2. knowingly: subjective std, person is aware that his conduct is of a particular nature or knows that his condcut will necessarily or very likely cause particular result
  3. recklessly: subjective std, person knows of substantial and unjustifiable risk and consciously disregards it
  4. negligently: objective std, fails to become aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the SI crimes?

A
attempt 
larceny & robbery
forgery
false pretenses
embezzlement 
conspiracy
assault
burglary
first-degree murder
solicitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are general intent crimes?

A

battery
rape
kidnapping
false imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are malice crimes?

A
CL murder (malice aforethought)
arson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are strict liability crimes?

A

statutory rape
regulatory crimes
administrative crimes
morality crimes (polygamy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the concurrence and causation requirements?

A

concurrence: D’s criminal act and requisite MR to commit crime occur simultaneously
causation: cause in fact and proximate cause

superseding factors break chain of causation
intervening: must be entirely unforeseeable to shield D from liability (V’s refusal of med. treatment, third-party neg. = foreseeable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the transferred intent doctrine?

A

D may be held liable if he intends the harm caused, but causes it to a different V or object than intended

this does not apply to attempt

17
Q

What is the effect of the transferred intent doctrine?

A

D is usually charged w/ 2 crimes: attempt (to commit orig. crime) and the actual, resulting crime

D intends to shoot A but kills. D can be charged w/ attempted murder of A and murder of B (no merger because DIFFERENT victims)

18
Q

What is the merger doctrine?

A

concerns relationship between inchoate & completed substantive offense; or offense and lesser included offense

when it applies, two offense merge - prohibiting D from being prosecuted for both crimes

19
Q

When does merger apply for inchoate crimes?

A

only applies to solicitation and attempt (prevents D from being convicted of both sol & attempt and the target offense)

D completes burglary after attempting - D cannot be convicted of both attempt and burg.

20
Q

Does merger apply to conspiracy?

A

No - can be convicted of conspiracy to commit crime and the crime itself

21
Q

Can D be convicted of a target crime adn a lesser included offense?

A

No - (LIO = includes same but not all elements of greater crime)

D’s robbery accomplice kills V during robb. D can be convicted of felony murder but not lesser included robb offense.

22
Q

Do crimes w/ different victims merge?

23
Q

What are the inchoate offenses?

A

solicitation
conspiracy
attempt

24
Q

Who is an accomplice?

A

one who aids, encourages, or counsels principal committing a crime w/ the intent to encourage commission

25
Is mere presence at the crime enough to be an accomplice?
No - need to assist in some way
26
When is an accomplice liable?
liable for the original crime and other foreseeable crimes committed by the principals in its furtherance
27
What defenses can an accomplice raise to liability?
Withdrawal: D can withdraw effectively before crimes are committed or become unstoppable How? 1. repudiate encourage and/or neutralize initial aid
28
What is an accessory-after-the-fact?
different from accomplice liability; involves helping someone escape or avoid apprehension; gives rise to separate, lesser charge of obstruction of justice