Criminal Offences Flashcards
(57 cards)
Assault
AR - D must case V to apprehend application of immediate unlawful physical force
MR - intention/reckless
Fine/6months - SO
Is fear necessary for assault
No just that the V apprehended immediate infliction of violence
Does not matter that D cannot inflict violence it’s what V believes
Battery
AR - D must apply unlawful force to V
MR - intention/reckless
Fine/6 months - SO
Can D be guilty of force is applied by an agent controlled by D (example)
Yes
Ds dog
Ds weapon
Knocking one person into another
Mum dropping a baby
S47 elements
AR - assault or battery which causes ABH
MR - intention/recklessness
TEW - max 5yrs
What is ABH defined as
Any hurt or injury which interferes with the health and comfort of V
Cut/bruise/hair cutting/psychological
More than Trivial or transient. Grazes/scratches won’t count
S20 elements
AR - Unlawfully wound or inflict GBH
MR - intention or reckless to foresee some harm. He does not need to foresee a word or GBH just some harm
Max 5 years TEW
Wound v inflict GBH
Wound - break both layers of skin
(Broken bone not thru skin not a wound/nor blood vessel rupture)
Inflict GBH - really serious bodily harm (broken bone/knocked out)
Need causation
S18 elements
AR - d must wound or cause GBH
MR - intention
Life imprisonment
MR INCLUDES THE INTENTION TO RESIST ARREST OR PREVENT ANOTHERS ARREST AND DOING SI RESULTS IN A WOUND/GBH
Murder elements
AR - unlawfully kill another human in king’s peace
MR - intention to kill or cause GBH
D foresaw the consequence as a virtual certainty result of his actions
Does the killing of an unborn child count as murder
No
Does fatally injuring an unborn child who has then been born and dies count as murder
Yes
When will acts of a third party break the chain of causation in a criminal offence
If third party acted freely, deliberately and informed
(Not reasonably)
When will acts of the V break the change of causation
Acted unreasonably
If the death occurs after 3 years of the injury occurring what is need to be prosecuted
Attorney Generals permission
Diminished Responsibility elements
Suffered mental condition
Caused by a medical condition
Must substantially impair Ds inability to understand nature of act/self control
Must be a significant cause in D killing
What are the two specific defences to murder
Diminished responsibility
Loss of control
Loss of control elements
Ds loss of control (not able to restrain himself) need not be sudden but more time passes less likely to apply
Qualifying trigger
Fear of SERIOUS violence
Things seriously said or done and D felt seriously wronged
Someone of same age and self restraint in the circumstances would have acted the same way
(DO NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT Ds INDIVIDUAL CIRCUMSTANCES)
Unlawful act manslaughter elements
AR - d committed an unlawful act which causes death
MR - intention to commit unlawful act (not death) D does not need to foresee any risk of death arising from his actions
Unlawful act must be dangerous what does this mean
Objective test as to whether a person would consider some harm no matter how small it’s sufficient to establish dangerousness
Gross negligence manslaughter
No need for D to commit a criminal act
DOC
Breached the duty
RP in Ds shoes would have foreseen a Serious obvious risk of death
Grossly negligent (so bad)
RP reasonable person
What are the sections for theft, burglary and robbery
S1 theft act - Theft
S8 theft act - robbery
S9 theft act - burglary
S10 theft act - aggravated burglary
Theft elements
AR appropriate property belonging to another
MR - dishonest and intend to permanently deprive the other of the property
Is taking property from outside a house theft
yes as personal property belonging to an individual is rarely abandoned as they intend bin men to take