CrimLaw Flashcards

1
Q

Specific Intent Crimes

A

(FATCATS):
* First-degree murder
* Assault with intent to commit battery
* Theft offenses (larceny, embezzlement, forgery, burglary, robbery)
* Conspiracy
* ATtempt
* Solicitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Malice crimes?

A

CL murder, arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MPC no words of intent standard?

A

Recklessly—D acts with a conscious disregard of a substantial and unjustifiable risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mistake of fact defense applies to which types of crimes?

A
  • A defense to specific-intent crimes if it is honest, even if unreasonable
  • A defense to general-intent or malice crimes, only if reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mistake of law defense apples to which types of crimes?

A

Only valid if:
* D relied on court decision/administrative order or official interpretation,
* Statutory definition of malum prohibitum crime not available before conduct, or
* An honestly held mistake of law negates required intent or mental state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

4 Insanity tests for defenses?

A
  • M’Naghten—D did not know either (i) the nature and quality of the act, or (ii) the wrongfulness of the act, because of a defect of reason due to mental disease (“right from wrong” test)
  • Irresistible impulse—D lacked capacity for self-control and free choice due to mental disease or defect (inability to conform conduct to the law)
  • Durham—the unlawful act was the product of D’s mental disease or defect (“but for” test)
  • MPC (combines M’Naghtenand irresistible impulse)—at the time of the conduct, D lacked substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act or to conform his conduct to law, as a result of mental disease or defect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Voluntary intoxification defense applies to which crimes?

A
  • A defense to SI crimes if it prevents the formation of the required intent
  • MPC—a defense to crimes with a mental state that is “purposely” or “knowingly” and the intoxication prevents the formation of that mental state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Involuntary intoxication applies to which crimes?

A

All

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which crimes can consitute a felony murder?

A

BARRK— burglary, arson, robbery, rape, and kidnapping)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is a imperfect defense?

A

Many states reduce murder to voluntary manslaughter if D started the altercation or unreasonably believed in the necessity of using deadly force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Criminally negligent homicide is another name for . . .

A

voluntary manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Elements of larceny?

A
  • Trespassory;
  • Taking and;
  • Carrying away;
  • Of the personal property;
  • Of another;
  • With the specific intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Elements of larceny by trick?

A
  • Larceny;
  • Accomplished by fraud or deceit;
  • That results in the conversion of the property of another.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Elements of forgery?

A
  • Making;
  • Of a false writing;
  • With apparent legal significance; and
  • With the intent to defraud.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elements of Embezzlement?

A
  • Fraudulent;
  • Conversion;
  • Of the property;
  • Of another;
  • By a person who is in lawful possession of the property.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Elements of false pretenses?

A
  • Obtaining title to the property;
  • Of another person;
  • Through the reliance of that person;
  • On a known false representation of a material past or present fact; and
  • The representation is made with the intent to defraud.
17
Q

Elements of robbery?

A
  • Larceny;
  • From the person or presence of the victim;
  • By force or intimidation.
18
Q

Elements of extortion

A
  • The taking of money or property from another by threat.
  • Making the threat (not obtaining the property) is the essence of the crime (majority view)
  • The threat need not be of immediate harm or of a physical nature
  • The property need not be on the victim or in his presence
19
Q

Elements of burglary?

A
  • Breaking and;
  • Entering;
  • Of the dwelling;
  • Of another;
  • At nighttime;
  • With the specific intent to commit a felony therein.
20
Q

Elements of arson

A
  • Malicious;
  • Burning;
  • Of the dwelling;
  • Of another.
21
Q

Kidnapping

A
  • Unlawful;
  • Confinement of a person;
  • Against that person’s will;
  • Coupled with either:
  • The movement; or
  • The hiding of that person.
22
Q

Elements of attempt?

A
  • A substantial step toward commission of crime (beyond mere preparation); coupled with
  • The specific intent to commit the crime.
23
Q

Defenses to attempt?

A
  • Factual impossibility—not a defense
  • Legal impossibility = defense
  • Abandonment—not a defense after completion of actus reus (substantial step or dangerous proximity)
24
Q

Elements of solicitation?

A
  • Enticing, encouraging, requesting, or commanding another person;
  • To commit a crime;
  • With the intent that the other person commits the crime.
25
Q

Elements of conspiracy?

A
  • An agreement;
  • Between two or more persons (bilateral conspiracy);
  • To accomplish an unlawful purpose;
  • With the intent to accomplish that purpose.

Majority/federal law/MPC
requires a lawful or unlawful overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy

26
Q

Is withdrawal a defense to conspiracy?

A
  • Liability for conspiracy:
  • Federal/majority rule—withdrawal is possible after the agreement and before the commission of an overt act, but D must give notice to co-conspirators or give timely notice to police
  • MPC/minority rule—subsequent withdrawal is possible only if D acts voluntarily to “thwart the success” of the conspiracy
  • Liability for substantive crimes—for this purpose, D may withdraw by giving notice to his co-conspirators or timely advising legal authorities of the existence of the conspiracy even though such an action does not thwart the conspiracy