Critical Thinking Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

Credibility pneumonic?

A

CRAVEN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Flaws pneumonic?

A

A PRAT CAN PASS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Credibility C?

A

Circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Credibility R?

A

Reputation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Credibility A?

A

Ability to see

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Credibility V?

A

Vested interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Credibility E?

A

Expertise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Credibility N?

A

Neutrality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Credibility - Circustance

A

Details of an event or situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Credibility - Reputation

A

How someone is thought of because of their character or position

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Credibility - Ability to see

A

How good was eyewitness ability, were they eyewitness, or a secondary source?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Credibility - Vested interest

A

Do they gain anything from claiming certain truths?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Credibility - Expertise

A

Do they have the relevant experience, training, knowledge and skills?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Credibility - Neutrality

A

Are they impartial?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Flaw - A

A

Ad Hominem/Appeals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Flaw - P

A

Post Hoc/Particular to the general

17
Q

Flaw - R

A

Restricted options

18
Q

Flaw - Appeals

A

History, popularity, emotion

19
Q

Flaw - T

20
Q

Flaw - C

A

Circular argument

21
Q

Flaw - N

A

Necessary/sufficient confusion

22
Q

Flaw - S

A

Slippery slope/Straw man

23
Q

Flaw - Ad Hominem

A

Against the man - criticising the author not addressing the argument

24
Q

Flaw - Post Hoc

A

If one phenomenon occurs after another, it is assumed to be caused by it

25
Flaw - Particular to the general
Arguing from a limited number of cases | All/some confusion
26
Flaw - Restricted options
Presenting the situation which makes it seem like there are fewer options than there actually are
27
Flaw - Tu Quoque
You too argument - if someone does it it's okay for me to
28
Flaw - Circular argument
The reasoning is not distinct from the conclusion, there is no external support
29
Flaw - Necessary/sufficient confusion
Confusing something between being essential (minimum requirement) in a situation and being all that is required
30
Flaw - Slippery slope
Arguing that one thing will inevitably cause others of worsening consequence
31
Flaw - Straw man
Presenting a form of the opposing view negatively in order to knock down the whole argument
32
Argument indicators - reasons
because, as, since, due to, such as
33
Argument indicators - conclusions
therefore, so thus, it follows that, consequently, should
34
Define claim
A statement or judgement that can be challenged
35
Define counter-assertion
A reason that would support an opponents argument