Crowd behaviour II Flashcards
(44 cards)
Transformations NOT
- Loss of self/ deindividuation
- Loss of self-control
- ‘Mob mentality’
Three transformations of crowd psychology
- Cognitive
- Relational
- Affective
A. Cognitive transformation (or ‘self-stereotyping)
Shift from seeing myself in terms of my personal identity to seeing myself in terms of my social identity
- I am a student
- I am an Arsenal fan
- I am a Catholic
- I am a member of the St Pauls community
(these are categories we can reflect upon, we do not forget we are a part of them)
For cognitive, this is really just a way of talking about the basic self-categorisation process
Explain cognitive transformation
- Individuals no longer think and act on basis of personal (and idiosyncratic) beliefs and values
- Instead, they think and act on their understandings of the category/ group’s norms, values, beliefs, and interests.
Cognitive transformation examples
- Football match norms
- Lecture theatre norms
- Rules of the mosh pit
(If they identify!)
What was collective behaviour in the St Pauls riot
Collective behaviour in the St Pauls riot was limited and patterned in line with the social identity (‘we as St Pauls residents’) shared by participants:
- Police were targets
- Banks, chain store; not local shops or houses
(Reicher, 1984)
B. Relational transformation
This is where…
- If you also have the same social identity as me…
- Instead of seeing you as ‘other’, I see you as part of ‘we’, ‘us’
i.e. We share social identity
IF you also have that social identity
Relational transformation
- what can shared identity result in?
- examples
Shared identity can result in a sense of connection and intimacy – even with strangers.
- More acceptance/enjoyment of others’ close physical presence (Novelli et al., 2010) - when they thought the person was in the same category as them they were more likely to sit next to them
- Reduced disgust at others’ bodily odours (Reicher et al., 2016) - when dirty t-shirt came from an in group member they were more happy to sniff it
- Trust, feeling safe - they tend to give and expect support more from another person that is in the same group as them
C. Affective transformation
Social identity as the prism through which people appraise physical stimuli and experience relational intimacy
In addition:
- Being supported by others feels good
- Support from others for desired goals is empowering which also feels good
- Validation of emotions by others in the group – makes them more intense
(affect means emotion)
What are mass gatherings + example
an occasion, either organised or spontaneous where the “number of people attending is sufficient to strain the planning and response resources of the community, city, or nation hosting the event“ (World Health Organisation, 2008)
(categorised by size and international components- people coming from all around the world)
What are thought of as typical mass gatherings:
- Olympics
- World Cup
- Glastonbury
- Hajj
Hajj
- One of the 5 pillars of Islam
- 2-3 million people at a time
- Global gathering- people go from all around the world
- Six days of rituals in and around Mecca
What was a coming together of different disciplines to solve its problems
‘Mass gatherings medicine’
‘Mass gatherings medicine’
What were the main problems?
- Infectious diseases
- Crowd crushes
Mass gatherings: Crowd crushes
‘Stampedes’?
- Most things called ‘stampedes’ in the media do not involve running- Most of the facial crushes do not involve running
- Deaths often caused by crowd collapse in extreme density
‘Panic’?
- Fear is a consequence rather than a cause of crushes- (knowing you are about to be killed not the cause of the crushing)
Crushing accidents linked to the Hajj + Hajj dimensions
Despite extreme levels of density every year, crushing accidents are extremely rare at Hajj
Holy Mosque: 356,800m2 (88.2 acres)
Average crowd density level of at least four people per square metre (4ppm2). However, at certain locations, levels of density as people get closer to the Kaaba = 6-8ppm2
What do Mass gatherings medicine emphasise?
Emphasise on the negative
Wellbeing from attending a mass gathering: An example
Magh Mela: Hindu festival takes place in India for a month every year
An aversive crowd experience?
- 20 million people in a ‘tent city’
- Densely populated.
- Sanitary conditions and facilities are extremely poor
- Constant loud noise.
Researchers wondered whether people could go to this event and come back feeling healthier
Tewari et al. (2012)
Mela and well-being
- Longitudinal survey
- Compared people who attended before and after and people who didn’t attend
- 416 pilgrims who attended for the whole month, and 127 controls who did not
- Pilgrims reported a longitudinal increase in well-being relative to the matched sample who did not participate
- Those who attended vs no attended reported much better health than those who didn’t attend
- Therefore it can be seen that attending a mass gathering can be good for you
Sum- Mela is good for you
Wellbeing associated with music (events)
Dingle et al. 2021
- Scoping review of 63 studies examining psychosocial mechanisms.
- Diverse music activities were considered: receptive and intentional music listening; sharing music; instrument playing; group singing; lyrics and rapping; movement and dance; and songwriting, composition, and improvisation.
- Some mechanisms: memory and attention, mood and emotion regulation, social bonding and connection
- Key point: effects of both music itself AND enjoying the music with others
What are features of relational and affective transformation in mass gatherings that might contribute to health and wellbeing:
- Expecting/ receiving support
- Positive emotions
- Validation
- Sense of empowerment
Relational transformation at the Mela
Hopkins et al. (2019)
Method
- Semi-structured interviews at the 2010 Mela
- 37 Kalpwasis (pilgrims): 24 men, 13 women, age range 40–83 years, M age = 63. (age tends to be skewed towards older group as representative of people who go on the pilgrimage)
- 29 were high caste and 8 low caste - correspond to the caste distribution at the event
- In Hindi or local dialects
- 30-80 minutes
- Thematic analysis
Relational transformation at the Mela effects
- Shared social identity
- Recognition
- Validation
- Solidarity - support
Relational transformation at the Mela
Shared social identity
‘In the railway station every person has a different purpose, going to different places, going to another country, going to separate stations. But here there is only one purpose, onedharma[a religious way of life characterised by virtue and duty] is to be performed, that is why the crowd here and outside are different [···] There everyone has separate purposes but here the purpose becomes only one!’
Researchers asked how the Mela crowd compared to that experienced in India’s busy railway stations. Typically, a clear contrast was drawn.
Relational transformation at the Mela
Recognition
- P18F60: Here, this is not there like “no, this is mine, this is yours”. At home, even if there is a minor issue, clashes takes place don’t they? Now, here at the bank of [the] Ganga, you know how much of a crowd is there, but still nothing ever happens with anyone.
- Interviewer: No clashes?
- P18F60: Even if you get wet it feels that “that person is also here for bathing”. This love increases. By seeing everyone it feels that, like the reason we have [come], they have also come. (so this persuades me to try and be cooperative with them)
Others are recognised as fellow pilgrims and as holding the same identity-related beliefs and values as oneself. In turn, there is a sense that others’ behaviour is intelligible and the basis for social interaction: Rather than ignoring each other, people interact in meaningful ways (“everyone lives cooperatively, talks to each other”). Also repair.
Somebody does something which might upset/ annoy you, you’re more understanding and take care of it in a forgiving way and try to repair relations between you because you can see this person is there for the same purpose as you.