Cultural Geography Flashcards
(143 cards)
What did the superorganic approach to culture entail in the Berkeley school?
- Reification of culture (ABSTRACT TO CONCRETE), separating it from individual agency
- “Culture was viewed an entity above man [sic]” (p182)
- Culture as a genetic code reinforced through inheritance (still forgetting human agency!)
- Concedes defeat to dominant forces changing society
- Homogenous cultures (and racism)
- Ontological and empirical errors
(Duncan, 1980)
What does modern (the “new” and contemporary forms of) cultural geography do?
Denaturalises notions of difference in people and places
What is culture, a priori?
- VALUES: this is paramount
- Customs
- Products
- Power
- Ideology
- Identity
Give 3 ways of understanding culture
- A way of seeing
- A way of being
- A way of shaping
What is one way in which culture could be seen as involuntary?
- The Spectacle (Debord, 1967)
- Images and materials shaping consumerism in western, advanced capitalist societies
- May not be part of identity, just a superimposed norms
- Life is all about getting the best commodities
What are the 5 aspects of the Berkeley school?
- Rejection of environmental determinism
- Culture as a morphology
- Spatial diffusion of cultures
- Sequent occupance and outcomes
- The “culture group”
What is a “culture group” (Sauerian cultural geo)?
- How cultures can be learnt from the family
- Cultural determinism
An overview of Berkeley school flaws
- Culture created change, not individuals changing culture
- A material focus, not looking at processes or nonmaterial aspects
- Rejected theoretical approaches
- A “genetic explanation” of outcomes, not processes
(Solot, 1986)
What is ironic about Sauer’s rejection of environmental determinism?
- In rejecting environmental determinism, he was against an overriding force determining places (Solot, 1986)
- Cultural determinism resulted in equally racist views because of the idea of a “culture group”, homogenity of culture and inherited cultures (Duncan, 1980 - see Mexican character types)
How did Sauer view animal domestication? What is wrong with this view?
- Rejected economic reasons for domestication because he believed this was driven by environmental issues (scarcity of resources, a Malthusian approach viewed by environmental determinists)
- Instead due to religion (SOLOT, 1986)
- Forgot that economic reasons can be a social relation, as Marx theorised - domestication to get more profit. A major misinterpretation of economics
- Religeous reasons probably before economic reasons, though (Philo 1995)
What did Sauer do well?
Resources determined by culture
(but if culture is superorganic how does this work? Marx saw resources as a social relation driven by values…)
(Solot 1986)
Why did the Berkeley school focus on rural areas?
Rural centrism due to the homogeneity assumption - rural areas less complex
(Duncan, 1980)
Has anyone supported the Berkeley school?
YES
Price and Lewis, 1993
- No superorganic in Sauerian cultural geography (even though Duncan showed it was strongly implied by Sauer and Zelinsky)
- Generalised all “old” cultural geography
Was the Berkeley school explanative?
Sequent occupancy described how the material landscape becomes what it is, which could be viewed as an explanation. NO explanation as to WHY changes occurred (Duncan, 1980)
Requires more of a Socratic method
What did the “New” cultural geography, with its origins at the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS), Birmingham, focus on?
- Power shaping cultural landscapes
- Culture as a “way of seeing”, thus differentially revealing and obscuring the world
What is an example of a cultural clash?
- Tebbit Cricket test (1990)
- “Which side do they cheer for? It’s an interesting test. Are you still harking back to where you came from or where you are?” (Tebbit, 1990)
- Makes culture a matter of choice and values
- Also power to force cultural change
- Economic rationality also important in culture
How does the Tebbit test link to the Berkeley school conception of culture?
Culture exists in a place prior to the arrival of people (superorganic, Duncan, 1980)
Interesting how the superorganic fallacy is used as a way of shaping values and power here
Good texts for landscape and power?
- Marxist approaches to landscape, capital and power (Nayak and Jeffrey, 2013)
- Subjugation of cultures in frontier capitalism (Patel and Moore, 2017)
- Shock doctrine and Sri Lanka developments (Klein, 2007)
How is power used to shape the landscape in Bedford, NY (In Landscapes of Privilege)
- Segregation through laws of exclusion enforced by local residents
- Prevents 4 acre plots being subdivided to allow less affluent citizens to move in
- Environmental issues used as main discourse in arguments
- Privacy defines Bedford - the town “wouldn’t exist” without 4 acre plots
- “Situational environmentalism” - environmental issues selectively used as cultural values
- Workers who are excluded from the community live in Mount Kisco nearby. These latino labourers maintain the pristine and cherished landscape in Bedford
(Duncan and Duncan, 2004)
What is the effect of racial minority labourers being excluded from the landscape of privilege they maintain in Bedford?
- Production alienation of workers from the fruits of their labour
- Consumer alienation (of post-marxism) of employers and the workers (links to class alienation)
- Mount Kisco is viewed as the “servants quarter” (p204) for Bedford’s workers by locals
(Duncan & Duncan, 2004)
What is discourse?
- A means of producing knowledge about the world, shaping how we see it
How does performance differ from discourse?
Shapes the world rather than simply presenting it
see Butler; Nussbaum, 1999
How does Orientalism by Said relate to geopolitics and cultural geography?
- Gives westerners authority over “oriental” places abroad
- Appropriates cultures and reinforces racial stereotypes
- Colonialism (geopolitics) is a “geographical imagination” - development is needed to help them (see Escobar)
How can seeing the landscape text be obscured by power structures and grand narriatives?
Landscape as a way of SEEING for bourgeoisie (illusionary) versus a WAY OF LIFE (/BEING) or the proletariat (vernacular) - a big emphasis on positionality (Daniels, 1989)
Interesting how even cultural geography’s categorisation into “ways of seeing” can be generalised