Damages and Equitable Remedies Flashcards

1
Q

Who said “it has been truly said that the assessment of damages in contract and tort is a pragmatic subject…which does not lend itself to hard and fast rules”?

A

Deane J in Commonwealth v Amann (1991) HCA.

Wrongful termination - wasted expenditure - chance of renewal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Exemplary or punitive damages are not recoverable as part of a damages award for breach of contract.

A

Butler v Fairclough (1917) per Griffith CJ.

A breach of contract may be innocent, even accidental or unconscious … Or it may be wilful…malicious and committed with the express intention of injuring the other party. But the measure of damages is not affected by any such considerations…”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The general rule is damages will be assessed at the date of breach, but is flexible if necessary to provide adequate compensation.

A

Johnson v Perez (1988) HCA

Injured plaintiff - sued solictors - when is claim assessed?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Loss of a chance damages are awarded in contract.

A

Chaplin v Hicks [1911] 2 KB 786

Beauty contest - inadequte notice of interview - lost chance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Non-economic loss is recoverable if there is physical inconvenience.

A

Hobbs v London & South Western Railway Co (1875)

Train stopped early - walked 4-5 miles home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Non-economic loss is recoverable for physical injury.

A

Godley v Perry [1960] 1 WLR 9

Toy catapult - malfunctioned - injured plaintiff’s eye.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Generally damages are not recoverable for disappointment and injured feelings.

A

Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909] UKHOL

Manager in Calcutta - replaced - home to England in humiliation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Non-economic loss is recoverable for disappointment if the contract was to provide enjoyment and freedom from disappointment.

A

Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) HCA

Cruise ship - holiday - sank due to negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rectification costs are the normal measure of costs.

A

Bellgrove v Eldridge (1954) HCA

House - defective foundations - instablity - demolish and rebuild.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Rectification costs will not be awarded if costs are unreasonable.

A

Ruxley Electronics v Forsyth [1995]

Pool - 9 inches too shallow - cost of demolishing excessive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Damages are available for loss of the use of money (i.e. additional borrowing costs, or costs of lost investment opportunity).

A

Hungerfords v Walker (1989) HCA

Accountants negligent - overpayed tax - loss of opportunity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The High Court has observed, a proper understanding of the doctrine requires ‘more than a brief backward glance’.

A

Andrews v ANZ [2012] HCA

Bank fees case - secondary obligation (no breach) - penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A liquidated damages clause will be a penalty if it is extravagant and unconscionable compared with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach.

A

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage and Motor Co Ltd [1915] UKHOL

Resale price management - now illegal - retailer in breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why is it beneficial to draft breach of contract claims as absolute breaches, rather than failure to take reasonable care?

A

Because it can circumvent:

  • the potential defences of contributory negligence (Part V Wrongs Act Vic); and
  • proportionate liability (a failure to take reasonable care).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Damages will be an inadequate remedy, allowing specific performance, if there is no substitute for performance available on the market.

A

Dougan v Ley (1946) HCA

Taxi sale - limited number - each unique - damages inadequate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Damages will be an inadequate remedy, allowing specific performance, if damages are unavailable.

A

JC Williamson Ltd v Mulholland (1931) HCA

Theatre lolly store - unenforcable licence - damages unavailable.

17
Q

Damages will be inadequate, allowing specific performance, where there is an exclusivity arrangement.

A

Curro v Beyond Productions Pty Ltd (1993) NSWSC

TV presenter - moved to Ch 9 - exclusivity not compensible.

18
Q

Damages awarded as a substitute for specific performance, but denied on a discretionary ground.

A

Equitable damages or ‘Lord Cairn’ Act’ damages - s 38 Supreme Court Act (Vic).