Datafication 7 Transfers Flashcards
(21 cards)
Transfer tools Art. 44
toolkit of mechanisms to transfer pd to 3rd country which are or intend processing
third country
outside EU & Iceland, Lichtenstein Norway etc.
e.g. CJEU case: is posting of pd on website = transfer to 3rd country as it makes data accessible to people in 3rd country?
- No, not intended to cover that by legislature
- then every posting on website = transfer to all 3rd countries
Transfer tools Chapter 5 Art. 45 - 50
- Adequacy decisions Art. 45
- Appropriate safeguards Art. 46
- Derogations
Adequacy decisions Art. 45
- EU Commission recognized countries to provide adequate protection
- essentially equivalent guarantees as in EU ensured by law for fundamental rights & freedoms
Adequacy decisions Art. 45 - requirement for transfering
Transfers without any specific authorization
Adequacy decisions Art. 45 - adoption of adequacy decision involves
- Proposal from European Commission
- Opinion of European Data Protection Board
- Approval from representatives of EU countries
- Adoption of decision by European Commission
Adequacy decisions Art. 45 - powers to withdraw etc.
At any time: European Parliament & Council can request maintain, amend, or withdraw if country exceed powers provided in regulation
Adequacy decisions Art. 45 - countries
Andorra, Argentina, Canada, Faroe Islands, Guernsey, Israel, Isle of Man, Japan, Jersey, New Zealand, Republic of Korea, Switzerland, UK, Uruguay
Appropriate safeguards Art. 46
- data controller or processor provided one:
- Standard contractual clauses (SCC)
- Binding corporate rules art. 47
- Approved codes of conduct & certification mechanisms
- Ad hoc contractual clauses (must have Supervisory Authority authorization)
- Reliance on international agreement
Standard contractual clauses (SCC) = Model Clauses
- EU Commission decides that SCCs = sufficient safeguards for international data transfer
- 2 SCCs sets to transfer data from dc in EU to dc outside EU / EEA
- 1 CC set to transfer data from dc in EU to dp outside EU / EEA
Binding corporate rules art. 47
- internal rules for transfers
- within a group of undertakings engaged in joint economic activity (multinational companies and governed by code of conduct)
- to countries that do not provide adequate level of protection
Binding corporate rules art. 47 - requirement
- shall be approved by SA if corporate rules …
a) are legally binding & apply to all members of group
b) include enforceable rights on ds with regard to processing of their pd
c) and fulfill requirements in Art. 47(2) - list of content
Binding corporate rules art. 47 - content (must include)
- Privacy principles (e.g. transparency, data quality, security)
- Tools of effectiveness (e.g. audits, trainings)
- Element providing that rules are binding
Binding corporate rules art. 47 - con
main company is liable for what other parties do, very expensive
Ad hoc contractual clauses
must have SA authorization
e.g. Schrems case
- “Safe Harbour Privacy principles” (= scheme for transfer of pd btw EU & US)
- invalid (Snowden reference): US not ensure adequate protection of pd against surveillance activities by US public authorities
- replacement by “EU-US Privacy Shield” including:
- Data protection obligations on companies receiving pd from EU
- mechanism independent from US intelligence service & deals with complaints of individuals
- Annual joint review to monitor
Schrems 2 case: new principles same flaws
- CJEU declared shield invalid
- but validity of SCC Decision while stricter requirements for SCC & BCR based transfers
- US not essentially equivalent levels of protection required by EU: not sufficiently limit powers of US authorities & lack actionable rights for EU subjects against US authorities
Derogations
- no other tool -> 1 condition must fulfilled:
1) Explicit consent from ds to transfer or necessary for…
2) protect vital interest of ds or other person (ds incapable of consent)
3) legal claims
4) contract btw ds & dc or pre-contractual measures taken at ds request
5) performance for contract in interest of ds btw dc & other person
6) important reasons of public interest
Risk assessment of transfers to 3rd countries (EDPB 01/2020)
1) Know transfer: map weather it is adequate, relevant & limited to what is necessary for purpose
2) Verify transfer tool
3) Asses 3rd country law / practice: anything reducing effectiveness of tools safeguards?
4) Identify & adopt supplementary measures required by 3 (ensure level of protection same as in EU)
5) Implement 4
6) Re-evaluate & monitor
Risk assessment of transfers to 3rd countries (EDPB 01/2020) - step 4 potential supplementary measures
- Pseudonymization
- No sensitive pd
- Shorter deletion deadlines
- Restricted access to retransmission
- Data-minimization
- Encryption
- Extended notification