DAY 2 (PM) Labor Law Flashcards
1) Santos Hauling Incorporated (SHI) dismissed its drivers and helpers after discovering that they were committing anomalous transactions involving the sale of excess broilers and crates, without the knowledge and consent of SHI. The
drivers and helpers filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against SHI. In its defense, SHI presented as evidence the affidavits of co-employees narrating the alleged anomalous transactions in detail.
May the drivers and helpers be dismissed on the basis of these affidavits? Explain your answer.
2) Maria met Ange, Louise, and Sam at a coffee shop one afternoon. Maria promised she could send the three of them to work as bartenders in Scotland in exchange for ₱100,000 each. Ange, Louise, and Sam immediately agreed and gave the money to Maria. Upon receipt of the placement fees, Maria used the money to
buy a luxury bag and posted it on her Instagram page. Ange, Louise, and Sam followed up on their employment in Scotland, but Maria stopped replying to them. After six months of waiting, Ange, Louise, and Sam filed a complaint for Illegal Recruitment in Large Scale against Maria. During trial, Ange, Louise, and Sam testified and presented a certification from the Department of Migrant Workers stating that Maria was neither licensed nor authorized to recruit people for employment. On the other hand, Maria claimed that she was not the one who recruited them but a certain Rashid, the president of the placement agency where
Maria supposedly worked.
Is Maria guilty of Illegal Recruitment in Large
Scale? Explain.
3) Lipad Pinoy (LP), a licensed local recruitment agency, deployed Mutya for its principal, Alab Construction (AC), for a two-year project in Dubai. Mutya had been on the job for one year when, for unknown reasons, AC and LP terminated their agency agreement. Thereafter, AC failed to pay the salary of Mutya. Upon
her return to the Philippines, Mutya sued both LP and AC for unpaid salaries and damages.
May LP be held liable together with AC? Explain.
4) Bangko Norte (BN) implemented an “Exogamy Policy”, which prohibits employees from marrying their co-employees. Specifically, the policy states that when two of its employees marry each other, one of them must sever his or her employment immediately. Clara, who was hired as an account specialist, married her co-worker Ibarra, a loan specialist. Subsequently, BN terminated the employment of Clara but retained Ibarra. Clara argued that the policy should not apply to her since she was employed prior to its effectivity, and that said policy
violates the Labor Code. She also pointed out that BN did not explain why it was her, and not Ibarra, whose employment was terminated. Since BN refused to reinstate her, Clara filed a complaint for illegal dismissal.
Will the complaint of Clara prosper? Discuss.
5) In computing the 13th month pay of its employees, Liwayway Company (LC) includes as basis not only the regular base pay but also the cash value of unused vacation and sick leaves. LC had been implementing this method for two years when it suddenly announced that the method was erroneous and would therefore
be discontinued.
May LC lawfully discontinue using this method? Discuss.
6) Roman, an employee of Baltazar Company (BC), was reported to have fallen asleep during work hours and that he smelled of marijuana. BC coordinated with Bibo Health Clinic, a facility accredited by the Department of Health, to conduct random drug testing on its employees. Roman tested positive during both the
screening and confirmatory tests. BC asked Roman to explain why he should not be sanctioned and dismissed. Roman denied that he used drugs and claimed that a colleague who bore a grudge merely framed him. Unsatisfied with his explanation, BC sent Roman a notice of termination.
Was the dismissal of Roman valid? Explain briefly.
7) Arnel, a 55-year-old seafarer who worked on board different foreign vessels, went to the office of the Social Security System (SSS) to avail of his retirement benefits. However, he found out that his contributions had not been paid by his principal employer, Pancho Lines (PL). When Arnel demanded an explanation from PL, the latter replied that it was not obligated to cover his SSS membership since he was hired abroad and covered by another insurance provider.
Is PL correct? Discuss your answer.
8) Araro Federation applied for registration as a federation in the agricultural sector. It has under its membership a mix of five rank-and-file unions and five supervisory unions. One of the rank-and-file unions and one of the supervisory
unions both belong to the same establishment, Ani Corporation (AC). AC opposed the application for registration citing the legal prohibition against the commingling of rank-and-file and supervisory employees.
Is the opposition of AC meritorious? Explain briefly.
9) Lazara Corporation (LC) and Lazara Employees Union (LEU) forged a collective
bargaining agreement (CBA). During the freedom period, a certification election
was conducted where LEU lost to Samahan ng Manggagawa sa Lazara (SML), a rival union in the same establishment. SML then sent a letter to LC demanding for renegotiation of the existing CBA. LC refused to renegotiate the CBA claiming its validity for two more years. SML filed a notice of strike against LC on the ground of Unfair Labor Practice for the alleged refusal of the latter to
comply with its duty to bargain collectively.
Is the notice of strike meritorious? Explain briefly.
10) Adarna Manufacturing Company (AMC) and Adarna Employees Union (AEU) entered into collective bargaining negotiations but reached an impasse. AEU then filed a notice of strike before the National Conciliation and Mediation Board, which immediately conducted conciliation meetings to avert the strike. Fifteen
days after the filing of the notice, and despite the conciliation proceedings, AEU staged a strike with the participation of 50% of its members.
Is the strike legal? Briefly explain.
11) In 2011, Amer and Raj worked as welders on board the barges of Magiting Shipping Company (MSC), which later changed its corporate name to Perlas Corporation (PC). In 2018, PC verbally dismissed Amer and Raj from employment. Thus, they jointly filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against PC, which countered that it already had a separate and distinct personality from MSC. It also alleged that both complainants were not its regular employees as they were
merely helpers brought in by its own regular employees on certain occasions when urgent repairs were required for its barges. The Labor Arbiter (LA) held that there was an employer-employee relationship between the parties based on Article 295 [280] of the Labor Code since Amer and Raj:
1) were engaged to perform activities which are usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade of PC; and
2) have rendered at least one year of service.
Was the LA correct in using Article 295 [280] as the basis? Explain briefly.
12) On May 15, 2022, Marina International Shipping (MIS) hired Felipe as a bosun on board its vessel for a period of nine months. On July 30, 2022, Felipe joined his vessel of assignment. On October 31, 2022, he was repatriated due to medical reasons and was immediately referred by MIS to its company-designated physician for treatment and monitoring. On May 31, 2023, the company-designated physician pronounced Felipe fit to resume sea duties.
Is MIS obligated to rehire Felipe? Explain briefly.
13) Sampaguita University (SU) hired Farah as Instructor I in the College of Education on a contractual or part-time basis beginning the first semester of school year 2015-2016. In 2018, SU appointed Farah as Instructor II. SU informed her that she will attain regular status on the condition that she obtain a master’s degree by May 31, 2022, otherwise, her employment will either be terminated or considered as contractual or part-time. When Farah failed to secure the required educational qualification within the allotted time, SU classified her as a part-time faculty effective June 1, 2022. On April 30, 2023, SU notified Farah that they will no longer be renewing or extending her contract as part-time faculty upon its expiration. Farah thus filed a complaint for illegal dismissal.
Will her complaint prosper? Discuss your answer.
14) Eduardo owns a licensed company that supplies janitorial and messengerial aides
to various businesses, including Gloria Restaurant (GR). The tools and supplies
used by the janitors and messengers are supplied by the clients who also train the
workers and monitor their performance. Their minimum wages are paid by the clients through Eduardo. After two years of working in GR, the janitors and messengers joined the union there to receive the same benefits as the directly
hired employees of GR.
Can the janitors and messengers legally join the
union? Discuss.
15) Ulap Airlines (UA) hired Salve as a cabin crew in 2010. Due to her hard work and spotless service record, she was eventually promoted to senior purser, a position imbued with trust and confidence. In 2023, after a flight from Sydney to
Manila, management received a report that Salve and other cabin crew alighted from the aircraft with two cups of instant noodles and a can of soda, which were part of the in-flight provisions for passengers. The items were confiscated and the cabin crew were required to explain why those items were in their possession. In her written explanation, Salve claimed that the cups of instant noodles were
purchased with her own money and that it was another flight attendant who admitted to taking the can of soda. After investigation, UA still terminated her employment on the grounds of serious misconduct and loss of trust and
confidence.
Was Salve validly dismissed? Discuss briefly.
