Deck 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Graham 3 Prong Test

A

1) Severity of Crime at issue;
2) Whether subject poses an immediate threat to the safety of officer(s) or others;
3) whether the subject is actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Tennessee v. Garner’s 3 circumstances when an officer can use Deadly Force

A

1) when the ofc is threatened with a deadly weapon;
2) when the ofc has PC to believe that the suspect poses a threat of serious physical harm or death to the officer
3) When the ofc has PC to believe that the suspect has committed a crime involving threatened or actual serious physical harm or death to another .
The court also noted ( when feasible) a warning should be given before use of Deadly Force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

An officer may use only that force which is both reasonable and necessary to effect an arrest or detention. Anything more is excessive force.

A

PAYNE v. PAULEY. 337 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2003)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

United States v. Dykes, 406 F.3d 717 (D.C. Cir. 2005)

A

The Graham v. Connor factors govern both the amount of force used, as well as the force method, tool, or weapon used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Even though officers used substantial force to compel the suspect into a prone position, only the last few blows lead to criminal liability because The suspect had complied with the order to assume a prone position and submit to handcuffing

A

United States v. Koon, 833 F.Supp. 769 (C.D. Cal. 1993), aff’d in part, 518 U.S. 81 (1996).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When officers are outnumbered or confronted with particularly powerful suspects, additional force may be justified.

A

Sharrar v. Felsing, 128 F.3d 810 (3rd Cir. 1997).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Tom v. Voida, 963 F.2d 952 (7th Cir. 1992)

A

Courts may also consider the immediate availability of less-lethal tools.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Police officers in all states are granted authority to use force to accomplish lawful objectives, such as arrest, entry to serve a warrant or make an arrest, and detention.

A

Freeman v. Gore, 483 F.3d 404 (5th Cir. 2007)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In Graham, what is the SCOTUS statement regarding the environment that Police Officers have to make decisions in.

A

“the calculus of reasonableness must embody allowance for the fact that police officers are often forced to make split-second judgments–in circumstances that are tense, uncertain, and rapidly evolving–about the amount of force that is necessary in a particular situation.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What case states that there is no duty to use lesser force when deadly force is authorized ?

A

Plakas v. Drinski

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case where suspect appeared to be drawing a gun and no gun found.

A

Thompson v. Hubbard

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case that addresses suspect’s known mental state regarding force.

A

Pena v. Leombruni

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case where Unarmed fleeing felon applied through Tennessee v. Garner.

A

Forrett v. Richardson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Additional case that Addresses 20/20 hindsight on officer shooting

A

Elliot v. Leavitt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Pepper Spray
• Traffic stop, violator wanted to see officer’s ID. Refused to exit car, then after handcuffed refused to get into squad car. Sprayed.

A

Martinez v. New Mexico Dept. of Public Safety, 47 Fed. Appx. 513 (10th Cir. 2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pepper spray
Resisted- could not see his hands
• Jones used an ankle turn, broke his leg.
• Qualified immunity, and at issue not weather he applied the ankle turn, but if pressure was increased after resisting ceased. Finding: Qualified Immunity not available, jury found that the force ‘increase’ was excessive

A

Jennings v. Jones, 2007 WL 2339195 (1st Cir. 2007)

17
Q

“…police officers performing a discretionary function enjoy an immunity that shields them from liability for civil damages unless. ( add to this card)

A

Milstead v. Kibler, 243 F.3d 157 (4th Cir. 2001)

18
Q

According to the 5th Circuit Court appeals, this case on deadly force is clear; “an officer cannot use deadly force without an immediate threat to himself or others.” (Penal Code 9.51)

A

Estate of Ceballos v. Bridgewater, Porras & Mull