deck_17555155 Flashcards
(43 cards)
What type of market efficiency can we test and what information is contained in that type?
Semi strong mkt efficiency. Definition: prices reflect all public information
What does efficiency in face of EMH mean?
Efficiency refers to the direction and magnitude of price fluctuations
What is strong EMH?
Prices reflect not only public but all relevant information
What are the three steps of Event study design?
1) Identify event and timing
2) Specify benchmark model for normal returns
3) Calculate abnormal returns : AR = R - NR
Name three types of benchmark models.
Mean adjusted model, Market adjusted model (assumes beta of firm is 1), CAPM (NR = rf + beta MRP)
How do we compute AAR, CAR, CAAR in AR matrix where rows are firm, and columns are time?
1) Computing average value of each column gives us AAR. Summing a row gives CAR. CAAR = 1/n Sum(CAR) and CAAR = sum(AAR)
What is cross-sectional correlation and its impact on statistical inference?
cov(ARi,t ; ARj,t) != 0
Impact: T-test becomes invalid. If cov >0 then: Variance is bigger than estimated –> SE are too low –> t-test is too high –> H0 rejected too often
How do we solve cross-sectional correlation?
Solution: Crude dependence SE or Average all returns cross-sectionally and treat these –> effectively we reduce matrix to one row only
What are Non Parametric tests and when are they used?
Sign Test: Tests proportion of negative to positive returns. Under H0: Distribution is symmetric and proportion is 50/50.
Rank Test: It is better than Sign test since it takes into consideration magnitude of AR.
How do we deal with cross-sectional heteroskedasticity?
1) Adjust SE of AAR and CAAR
2) Standardize AR by firm
How do we estimate NR if time horizon is long?
In such a case it is more proper to use FF3-factor model.
NR= Ri-rf=a + b(MRP)+ gSMB + gHML + eit
What is a benefit of using the FF3-factor model?
Benefit: leads to lower cross-sectional corr of AR!!!
Describe the Pooled OLS approach in Panel Data.
Model pools observations from different time periods ignoring firms. This effectively combines panel data into one cross-section. Mitigates event clustering.
What do fixed firm and time effects do?
FFE: Controls for cross-sectional heterogeneity. Captures effects that vary across firms but not in time.
TFE: Controls for time level heterogeneity. Captures effects of variables that vary across time but are constant cross-sectionally.
What are drawbacks of fixed effects?
FFE: Cannot identify effects of variables that are constant over time
TFE: Cannot identify effects of var. constant across firms.
How can we mitigate that SE are correlated across time or firms?
We can cluster SE. In that way error terms can covary within clusters but not between. We can cluster by firm, by time, or by both.
Do fixed effects take away the need for clustering of SE?
NO! Fixed effects do not fix the issue. Autocorrelation among error terms still remains.
Describe the FMB process.
1) Run a time series regression on each stock and obtain factor loadings (betas).
2) For each time period do a cross-sectional regression with factor loading betas as predictors. The resulting parameter estimates - gammas are the risk premia.
What are benefits of FMB?
1) Allows for time variation in IV’s
2) Betas are allowed to change over time
3) Does not use forward looking inf.
4) Corrects for cross-sectional correlation of error terms
What are the five OLS assumptions, with mathematical notation?
1) Linearity : yt = at + bxt + et
2) Random Sampling: cov(u_t ; u_t+j) = 0
3) Sample variation: Var[x] >0
4) ZCM: E[u_t |x] = 0
5) Homoskedasticity: V[u_t|x] = var < inf
6) Normality: u_t ~ N(0, var)
What is the impact if x is not exogenous?
This implies that E[u_t|x]!=0
This means that x and y are jointly determined at the same time. Can’t make causal inference.
If we have autocorrelation, which assumption is violated?
Random sample assumption: cov{u_t ; u_t+j) =0 is violated.
If we observe non-stationarity, which assumption is violated?
Stationarity means: Unconditional joint probability distribution does change over time. This implies constant unconditional mean and variance. Hence Homoskedasticity is violated.
When we have non-normality in small samples which test can we use to check for non-normality?
Bera-Jarque test. It tests whether skewness (b1) and kurtosis (b2) are jointly zero.