Defamation Flashcards
What is Defamation?
Injury to a persons reputation
Common Law Elements of Defamation
- Defamatory Statement,
- Reference to the ∏,
- Pub. by ▵ to 3d Pers. &
- Damage to ∏’s Reputation
What is a defamatory Statement?
Allegation of fact that harms rep. of ∏ by reflecting negatively on a char. trait
- Insults or name calling = NOT defamatory
Reference to Plaintiff
Statement must explicitly ID ∏ (“of or concerning” ∏)
- ∏ must be alive
- Corp. may be defamed but only if st. prejudices the corp. in its course of bus. or deters others from dealing w/ the corp.
Publication by Defendant to Third Person
Seen or heard by someone other than the ∏, Must be
- Intentional - Intent to publish, not intent to defame OR
- Negligent - Pub. doesn’t have to be intentional, Negligent pub. is suff.
Damage to Plaintiff’s Reputation
Whether damages are req. for ∏ to succeed depends on type of defamation alleged (libel, slander or slander per se)
Libel
Published in durable form (written words, film, CD, DVD, radio show, Blogging)
- Damages Presumed - ∏ in libel case doesn’t need to show damages to succeed in a libel action
Slander
- Defamation
- Published in some fleeting form (spoken words or sounds, sign lang., gestures)
- Special damages - Must be econ. harm for ∏ to prevail in a slander action that is not based on a slander per se
Slander Per Se
Damages Presumed - 4 Kinds of slander per se that ∏ doesn’t need to show damages to succeed in defamation action
- Crimes of Moral Turpitude - Statements accusing ∏ of crimes of moral turpitude
- Loathsome Disease - St. alleging that ∏ suffers from venereal disease or other loathsome disease
- Sexual Misconduct - St. imputing serious sexual misconduct to the ∏ (Gender Specific - Only applies to women)
- Adversely Reflects on One’s Conduct in Business, profession, Trade, or Office - St. adv. reflecting on a persons fit. to conduct their bus.
First Amendment Privilege (Constitutional Requirements)
When do Constitutional issues arise in regard to defamation?
Const. issues w/ defamation arise when the def. refers to a pub. figure or involves a matter of pub. concern
First Amendment Privilege (Constitutional Requirements)
What must Plaintiff prove if the defamation refers to a public figure or deals with a matter of public concern?
Const. req. ∏ to prove 2 additional elements when defam. refers to pub. figure or deals w/ matter of pub. concern. ∏ must show:
- Defamation is False AND
- Burden of Proof = ∏ - Shifts burden of proof from ▵ (truth as complete def.) to the ∏ (falsity becomes an element of the COA)
- Fault by the ▵
- Pub. Official or Figure = Malice - Malice on part of ▵ must be proved
- Knowledge that statement is false OR
- Reckless Disregard - ▵ in fact entertained serious doubts as to the truth of her pub.
- Pub. Official or Figure = Malice - Malice on part of ▵ must be proved
First Amendment Privilege (Constitutional Requirements)
Private indiv. brings defamation action
Private Person = Negligence
- In defam. actions brought by priv. persons that involve matter of pub. concern,
- ∏ only need to prove neg. by the ▵ regarding the falsity of the statement
Defamation Defenses
- Consent
- Absolute Priv.
- Truth
- Qualified Priv.
Defense - Consent
(Complete Defense) - ∏ consents to the publication
Defense - Absolute Privilege
Can’t be Lost - Based on the state or identity of the speaker
- Motive of speaker is irrelevant
Defense - Absolute Privilege
Categories
- Husband & Wife - Any co. b/w H & W is absolutely Priv.
- Judicial Proceedings - Judges, layers, parties, witnesses have abs. priv. for any statements made during a judicial proceeding, regardless of the motives for these statements
- Legislative Proceedings - Statements made by leg. while acting in leg. capacity are abs. priv.
- Gov’t Officials - Statements made by gov’t officials in the course of their position as gov’t officials are abs. priv.
- Compelled Broadcasts - One who is req. by law to pub. a defamatory matter is abs. priv. to publish it
Defense - Qualified Privilege
Based on the circ. or occasion of the remarks (where there is a pub. int. in encouraging candor)
- This priv. will be lose if abused
Defense - Qualified Privilege
Forefiture of Qualified Priv.
Forfeited if abused (malice, ulterior motive or excessive pub.)
- Ulterior Motive - Qual. Priv. forfeited if prim. purp. of st. is something other than protecting the int. for which the priv. is given
- Excessive Publication - ▵ will lose qual. priv. if the st. is not w/in the scope of priv.
- Made to persons to whom pub. not reas. nec. OR
- More Damaging than Reas. Nec.
Defense - Qualified Privilege
Forefiture of Qualified Priv. - Actual Malice
Actual Malice = Knowledge or Reckless Disregard
- ▵ must have reas. basis for the st. made
- Priv. lost if the ▵ knew the st. was false when made or acted in reckless disregard as to whether it was true
Defense - Qualified Privilege
Forefiture of Qualified Priv. - Ulterior Motive
Qual. Priv. forfeited if prim. purp. of st. is something other than protecting the int. for which the priv. is given
Defense - Qualified Privilege
Forefiture of Qualified Priv. - Excessive Publication
▵ will lose qual. priv. if the st. is not w/in the scope of priv.
- Made to persons to whom pub. not reas. nec. OR
- More Damaging than Reas. Nec.
Defense - Qualified Privilege
Categories of Qualified Privilege
Arises in socially useful contexts ➞ potentially defam. st. is relevant to some socially useful purpose
- Report of Public Proceedings - Court cases, legislative hearings
- Protection of Publisher’s Interest - Qual. Priv. to act for the protection of publisher’s int. (protection of one’s prop. or reputation)
- Protection of Recipient’s Interests - Qual. Priv. to act for the protection of the recipient’s int. (job ref., letters of rec. , credit reporting agencies)
- Key - St. was made in response to a request not vol. by the ▵
- Common Interest - Circ. lead any one of several persons having com. int. in a particular subj. matter correctly or reas. believe that there is info that another sharing the com. int. is entitled to know
- e.g. common prop, bus. and prof. int. as well as members of religious, fraternal and charit. assoc.
- Communication to One Who May Act in the Public Interest - St. made to pers. who has the power to act in the pub. int. (pub. official)
- E.g. private citizen reports a crime to the police or district attorney
What are the steps to analyzing a defamation claim?
- Determine if the communication is defamatory
- Evaluate pleading issues
- Evidence of Publication
- Determine what type of defamation it is
- Libel or slander
- Determine if common law priv. are applicable
- Analyze any first amendment issues
Can the tort claim for defamation survive death?
No, the dead do not have defamation claims