Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Criminal Law > Defenses > Flashcards

Defenses Flashcards

1
Q

Fully Exculpatory v. Partially Exculpatory

A

(Fully exculpatory defense)- relieves the D of any guilt or blame

-(Partially exculpatory defense)- merely reduces blameworthiness (guilty but)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of Fully Exculpatory Defenses

A

Include:

  • Insanity
  • Perfect Self-Defense
  • Involuntary Intoxication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of Partially Exculpatory Defense

A

Include:

  • Adequate provocation
  • Imperfect self-defense
  • Voluntary Intoxication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Excuse v. Justification

A

(Excuse)- acknowledges Ds conduct as wrongful and blameworthy, but circumstances were such that D should not be held fully responsible.

-(Justification)- alleges that criminal act was warranted (not wrongful or blameworthy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of Excuses (ACDDEIIIM)

A

Include:

  • Adequate provocation
  • Competency
  • Duress
  • Diminished Capacity
  • Entrapment
  • Infancy
  • Intoxication
  • Insanity
  • Mistake of fact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of Justification

A

Include:

  • Defense of Property
  • Domestic Authority
  • Law Enforcement Arrests
  • Necessity
  • Resisting Unlawful Arrest
  • Self-Defense
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Insanity

A

If the D is insane at the time of his criminal act, no criminal liability will be imposed for the criminal act. 4 tests include:

  • M’Naghten test
  • Irresistible impulse test
  • Durham Rule
  • MPC Test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

M’Naghten Test

A

D is not guilty if at the time of the crime, they were laboring under a defect of reason from a disease of the mind which caused them to not know the nature and quality of their act or not know that their acts were wrong.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Split in M’Naghten Jurisdictions

A

There is a split on whether “wrong” includes both legal and moral wrongs:

  • some jurisdictions will find that a defendant is not insane, where, even though the D believes the act was not morally wrong, he knows it to be illegal.
  • other jurisdictions will find Ds who do not know an act was morally wrong to be insane, regardless of their belief as to the act’s legality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What Constitutes a “Disease of the Mind” Under the M’Naghten Test?

A

All mental abnormalities, but not a psychopathic personality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Irresistible Impulse Test

A

D is not guilty if at crime’s commission, they had a mental disease that kept them from controlling their conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Durham Rule

A

D is not guilty if but for the mental defect or disease –> the D would not have been committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

MPC Test

A

D is not guilty if they lacked the substantial capacity to either appreciate the criminality of their conduct or conform their conduct to req. of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Presumption of Sanity

A

A D is presumed sane, therefore, the burden is on the D to prove otherwise (clear and convincing in federal court, preponderance of evidence in state court).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Competency: What is Incompetency?

A

When Ds have insufficient present ability to consult counsel with a reasonable and rational understanding of the proceedings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Competency: Restoration

A

Even if a D is found incompetent, he can later be tried and punished if competency is restored.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Insanity v. Competency

A

Insanity concern’s state of mind at time of offense; competency is assessed at any time during criminal proceedings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Competency: BOP

A

Is preponderance of the evidence. In the federal system, the BOP falls on the party making the motion to determine competence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Diminished Capacity

A

When as a result of a mental defect, the D did not have a state of mind that is an element of the offense (used to negate specific mental state).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Voluntary Intoxication

A

Can only be used as a defense to specific-intent crimes (negates the specific mental state). Cannot be used for SL or general intent crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Voluntary Intoxication: BOP

A

D has BOP of showing that they were intoxicated & that intoxication prevented them from forming requisite intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Involuntary Intoxication

A

Is a defense to general-intent and specific-intent crimes, but never SL.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Infancy

A

Today most states have abolished the CL presumptions and established a specific minimum age required for a criminal conviction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Duress

A

When the D reasonably believes that the only way to avoid unlawful threats of great bodily harm or imminent death is to engage in unlawful conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Duress: Human Forces

A

For duress to apply, the threat must come from human forces rather than from forces of nature.

26
Q

Crimes for which Duress can be a Defense?

A

Include manslaughter and felony murder (if it operates as a defense to the underlying felony).

27
Q

Crimes for which Duress Cannot Apply as a Defense?

A

Murder

28
Q

Entrapment

A

When the criminal act was the product of creativity from law enforcement + the D was in no way predisposed to commit crime (past criminal record is relevant).

29
Q

Can One Assert an Entrapment Defense While Denying Guilt?

A

Most states say no but federal courts say yes.

30
Q

Entrapment by Estoppel

A

When a gov. official assures a D that certain conduct is legal + the D reasonably relies on that advice and engages in that conduct.

31
Q

Mistake of Fact

A

When the mistake negates the existence of a mental state required to establish a material element of the crime.

32
Q

Mistake of Fact: General-Intent Crimes

A

A mistake of fact defense to a general intent crime is only available if the mistake is obj. reasonable

33
Q

Mistake of Fact: Specific-Intent Crimes

A

A mistake of fact defense to a specific intent crime is available if the D subjectively possessed it.

34
Q

Mistake of Fact: SL Crimes

A

Mistake of fact is never a defense to a SL crime, which itself requires no mental state.

35
Q

Self-Defense

A

When a D reasonably believes that they are in imminent danger of unlawful bodily harm, they can use reasonably necessary force to prevent harm.

36
Q

Self-Defense: Reasonable Belief Req.

A

Involves both a subj. and obj. req.

37
Q

Self-Defense: Imminent Danger

A

Does not include attacks of retaliation or revenge or preemptive attacks in anticipation of a future threat.

38
Q

Self-Defense: Reasonably Necessary Force

A

Force must be proportional to the unlawful attack that the D seeks to thwart.

39
Q

Self-Defense: Deadly Force

A

Is only reasonably necessary when it is used to thwart an unlawful attack that threatens death or serious bodily injury (non-deadly force cannot be available).

40
Q

Self-Defense: Duty to Retreat

A

The majority rule is that a person has no duty to retreat from an attack that threatens deadly force. The minority rule does impose a duty if it is feasible and can be done in safety.

41
Q

Self-Defense: When there is Never a Duty to Retreat in a Ds Own Home

A

There is no duty to retreat in a Ds own home, vehicle, or workplace (unless the D is the aggressor).

42
Q

Self-Defense: Unclean Hands

A

This doctrine essentially says that the first aggressor may not claim self-defense.

  • CL- the initial aggressor could regain the right to self-defense only by complete withdrawal perceived by the original V.
  • Modern rule- first aggressor will regain the right of self-defense if original V responds to the aggression with excessive force.
43
Q

Defense of a Third Person

A

When a D reasonably but mistakenly believes that a third person was a non-aggressor being unlawfully attacked by another.

44
Q

Defense of a Third Party: Is Relationship to Third Party Important?

A

No. The defense can be asserted regardless of Ds relationship to third party.

45
Q

Defense of Property

A

Where D has reasonable belief that property is in immediate danger + no greater force than necessary is used.

46
Q

Defense of Property: Regaining Property

A

Reasonable non-deadly force is justified when used to reenter RP or regain possession of wrongfully taken PP in immediate pursuit.

47
Q

Defense of Property: Deadly Force

A

Is only justified where D reasonably believes that an entry will be made or attempted in his dwelling by one intending to commit a felony therein.

48
Q

Necessity

A

When a person reasonably believes that a perilous circumstance has created an imminent threat of bodily harm, they are justified to use reasonably necessary force to cause a lesser harm

49
Q

Necessity: Natural Forces

A

Unlike duress, the threat for necessity must come from natural/non-human forces.

50
Q

Necessity: Situations Created by D

A

A D cannot successfully assert the defense when the D was at fault in creating the perilous situation.

51
Q

Law Enforcement Defenses: Non-Deadly Force by Police

A

Is allowed when a cop reasonably believes it is necessary to effect a lawful arrest or prevent the escape of the arrestee.

52
Q

Law Enforcement Defenses: Deadly Force by Police

A

Is permitted only if it is reasonably necessary to prevent the commission of a dangerous felony or to effectuate an arrest of a person reasonably believed to have committed a felony.

53
Q

Law Enforcement Defenses: Non-Deadly Force by Private Citizens

A

Is permitted when it is reasonably necessary to prevent the commission of a felony or misdemeanor amounting to a breach of the peace.

54
Q

Law Enforcement Defenses: Citizen’s Arrest

A

Involving non-deadly force is permitted if the crime was committed and the D reasonably believes the person against whom he uses the force committed the crime.

55
Q

Law Enforcement Defenses: Deadly Force by Private Citizens

A

Allowed only if:

  • A dangerous felony is involved and
  • The person against whom he used the force is actually guilty of a crime
  • Mistakes are impermissible
56
Q

Resisting Unlawful Arrest

A

The majority rule is that a D may use reasonable, non-deadly force to resist an unlawful arrest

57
Q

What if One is Subject to a Lawful Arrest?

A

An individual may only resist a lawful arrest by a police officer where the individual does not know that the other person is a police officer.

58
Q

Domestic Authority

A

The parents of a minor child or one in loco parentis may justifiably use reasonable force on the child to promote the child’s welfare.

-This defense is also available to those with comparable authority (e.g. a ship’s captain)

59
Q

Domestic Authority: Reasonableness Factors

A

Include the child’s age, sex, health, and particular misconduct.

60
Q

Consent

A

Not a defense to a crime except when it negates a specific element of the offense, such as rape or kidnapping.

61
Q

Forgiveness form V (Condonation)

A

Generally not a defense to criminal liability.

62
Q

Mistake of Law

A

Is generally not a defense unless:

  • no statute proscribing Ds conduct has been made reasonably available
  • D reasonably relied on a statute or judicial decision that was repealed or overruled
  • D reasonably relied on an agency’s or public official’s interpretation.
  • An element of the crime is awareness of the law.
  • Entrapment by Estoppel

Criminal Law (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions