Definitions Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Define Intent

A

Intent to do a specific act

Intent to get a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

R v Collister

A

Intent can be inferred from the circumstantial evidence including:
- The actions and words of the defendant before during an after
- The nature of the Act
- The surrounding circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Reckless

A

Deliberate taking of an unjustified risk.

R v Cameron
R v Tipple

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Cameron

A

Recklessness is established if:

(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) his actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) the circumstances existed; and
(b) having regards to that risk, those actions were unreasonable

and …

the subjective and objective tests to prove recklessness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Tipple

A

“Recklessness requires that the offender know of, or have a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk and it may be said that it requires a deliberate decision to run that risk.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the subjective and objective test with regards to recklessness?

A

The subjective test - completely subjective:
Has the defendant recognised the risk the offence anticipates as being possible?

The objective test - subjective and objective:
Are the defendant’s actions objectively reasonable?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Archer

A

“Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define fire

A

Fire is the result of combustion, a chemical reaction between fuel and oxygen, triggered by heat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is sufficient to prove property damage by fire - does the property have to be set alight?

A

Burning, blistering of paint, charring, melting or sufficient smoke damage will suffice.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define explosive

A

Section 2, Arms Act 1983

Means any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in its normal state is capable either of decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect.

The definition does NOT include firearms or fireworks or molotov cocktail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define the term property

A

Section 2, Crimes Act 1961

Property includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest.

Only tangible property is capable of being damaged by fire or explosive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the definition of ‘knowing’?

A

Simester and Brookbanks suggest ‘knowing’ means: “knowing or correctly believing. The defendant may believe something wrongly, but cannot ‘know’ something that is false.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the subjective / objective test in relation to the defendant’s degree of knowledge

A

The subjective test: - what was the defendant thinking at the time? Did the defendant know that human life was likely to be endangered by his actions?

If there is insufficient evidence that the defendant was conscious of the risk, the next question is:

The objective test: - what would a reasonable person have thought in the circumstances? Would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the definition of ‘danger to life’?

A

R v Smith

“Life” in this context means human life, and the danger must be to the life of someone other than the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define is likely to ensue

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define claim of right

A

Section 2, Crimes Act 1961

A belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed.

17
Q

Define immovable property

A

Property will be considered immovable if it is currently fixed in place and unable to be moved, even though it may be possible to make it movable.

18
Q

Define vehicle

A

Section 2, LTA 1998

(a) means a contrivance equipped with wheels, tracks or revolving runners on which it moves or is moved
(b) includes a hovercraft, skateboard, skates

19
Q

Define ship

A

Section 2, Crimes Act 1961

Ship means every description of vessel used in navigation, however propelled; and includes any barge, lighter, dinghy, raft or like vessel.

20
Q

Define aircraft

A

Section 2, Civil Aviation Act 1990

Any machine that can derive support in the atmosphere from reactions of the air otherwise than by the reactions of the air against the surface of the earth.

21
Q

Define interest

A

“Interest” in property is not defined by legislation, however the courts have held that tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it.

22
Q

R v Wilson

A

Tenancy of a property constitutes an interest in it.

Application: interest in property

23
Q

Define Obtain

A

Obtain, in relation to any person, means obtain or retain for himself or herself or for any other person.

24
Q

Define benefit

A

Section 267(4), Crimes Act 1961
Any property, privilege, service, benefit, pecuniary advantage, or valuable consideration.

In the context of arson, this includes damage to the defendant’s own property if it was done with the intention of incurring a benefit

25
Define pecuniary advantage
“Pecuniary advantage” means anything that improves the defendant’s financial position.
26
Define loss
Loss is not defined by statute; in most cases it will involve financial detriment to the victim. R v Morley
27
Morley v R
“Loss … is assessed by the extent to which the complainant’s position prior to the (offence) has been diminished or impaired.” It not necessary that the victim’s loss results in any benefit to the offender. Application: cause loss
28
Legally you are allowed to set fire to or damage your own property, however, there are exceptions to the general rule. What are these exceptions?
- You intend to cause loss to someone else as a result of the fire - You intend to benefit as a result of the fire - You know or ought to know that the fire will endanger life - You know that the fire is likely to destroy or damage someone else’s property as a consequence
29
Define person
Gender neutral. Proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence. Section 2, Crimes Act 1961 The legislation provides a wide definition of person to include not only real people, but also companies, public bodies, authorities and other organisations ; i.e. Police organisation is a ‘person’ under this wider definition
30
Outline the legislative definition of Attempts
Section 72(1), Crimes Act 1961 Attempts: Everyone who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.
31
What intent must be proven in attempts to commit arson?
The crown must prove that the defendant intended to commit the full act of arson, and acted for the purposes of achieving that aim.
32
Attempt
In R v Harpur an attempt includes an act or omission constituting a substantial step in a course of conduct planned to culminate in his commission of the crime. - Must have progressed past preparation - Must be sufficiently proximate to the offence. - Must have taken a real and practical step towards committing it.
33
R v Harpur
’‘(The Court may) have regard to (the defendant’s) conduct viewed cumulatively up to the point where the conduct in question stops …. the defendant’s conduct (may) be considered in its entirety. Considering how much remains to be done … is always relevant, though not determinative’.
34
Providing Explosives to commit offence
Section 272 Crimes Act 1961 2 years 1. A person 2. Knowingly has in their possession or makes any explosive substances 3. With intent to use or enable another person to use the substance 4. To commit an offence
35
R v Hallam
“On a charge of knowingly having possession of an explosive substance, it must be proved that the offender knowingly had the substance in his possession and also that he knew it to be an explosive substance.”
36
What is a Molotov cocktail?
A crude incendiary device typically consisting of a bottle filled with flammable liquid and with a means of ignition - essentially an accelerant contained within a breakable vessel so that when it shatters the accelerant is spread and ignited by the flames from the burning rag or similar attached to the vessel.
37
What is the appropriate charge in cases where a Molotov cocktail has been used?
‘Damages by fire’ NOT ‘Damages by means of any explosive’ If you remember only one thing - remember this.
38
List five common methods of setting fires.
- Candles - Chemical igniters - Molotov cocktails - Matches and cigarettes - Readily combustible material (rubbish)
39
List examples of carelessness that might result in a fire.
− misusing electricity − children playing with matches, cigarette lighters and so on − burning off paint − vagrants lighting fires − welding and other industrial processes − leaving clothes near heating − wrapping up live ashes in paper − ironing − setting off fireworks − using or storing flammable materials − burning rubbish − using domestic or camp fires − leaving a stove or heater on − leaving fat unattended while cooking − smoking