Definitions of Abnormality Flashcards

(35 cards)

1
Q

What is psychopathology?

A

The study of psychological disorders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of statistical infrequency?

A

When an individual has a less common characteristic compared to the majority of the population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of deviation from social norms?

A

Behaviour that differs from the accepted standards or rules of behaviour within a society or community.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does statistical infrequency define abnormality?

A

Behaviour that is rare or numerically unusual is considered abnormal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What type of data is used to determine statistical infrequency?

A

Measurable data that follows a normal distribution (e.g. IQ scores).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is considered an abnormal IQ score?

A

An IQ below 70, as only about 2% of the population score this low.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What diagnosis is linked to a statistically low IQ?

A

Intellectual disability disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a strength of statistical infrequency?

A

It has real-life application in diagnosing intellectual disability disorder and helps in clinical assessment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is a limitation of statistical infrequency regarding positive traits?

A

Unusual characteristics like high IQ are statistically abnormal but not undesirable, so they don’t indicate a disorder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why might labelling someone as abnormal be unhelpful?

A

If the person is functioning well and happy, a label could cause unnecessary stigma or distress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does deviation from social norms define abnormality?

A

Behaviour is considered abnormal if it violates expected or accepted societal standards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is an example of a diagnosis based on deviation from social norms?

A

Antisocial personality disorder (psychopathy), which involves not conforming to moral or ethical norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why are norms not universal?

A

Social norms vary across cultures and over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is a strength of this definition?

A

It has a role in diagnosing disorders like antisocial personality disorder and considers desirability of behaviours.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a major limitation of this definition?

A

It is culturally relative – what’s abnormal in one culture might be normal in another (e.g. hearing voices).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How can it lead to human rights abuses?

A

Historically, it has been used to control minority groups and women by labelling non-conforming behaviour as mentally disordered.

17
Q

Why might social norms be more useful than statistical norms?

A

They consider the desirability of behaviour – e.g., being a genius is rare but not undesirable, so it shouldn’t be seen as abnormal.

18
Q

Why is deviation from social norms not a complete explanation on its own?

A

It often needs to be combined with other definitions like failure to function adequately to fully assess abnormality.

19
Q

How might cultural relativism create problems in diagnosis?

A

People from different cultures may be wrongly labelled as abnormal due to differing norms and values.

20
Q

What is meant by failure to function adequately?

A

It occurs when someone is unable to cope with the ordinary demands of day-to-day living.

21
Q

What is meant by deviation from ideal mental health?

A

It occurs when someone does not meet a set of criteria for what is considered good mental health.

22
Q

Who proposed indicators for failure to function adequately?

A

Rosenhan and Seligman (1989).

23
Q

What are the signs that someone is failing to function adequately?

A

• Not conforming to interpersonal rules (e.g., eye contact, personal space).
• Experiencing severe personal distress.
• Behaviour becomes irrational or dangerous to self or others.

24
Q

Give an example of a disorder involving failure to function adequately.

A

Intellectual disability disorder – a diagnosis requires both low IQ and inability to cope with everyday life.

25
What is a strength of this definition?
It considers the patient’s subjective experience, which makes it a useful criterion for real-life assessment.
26
What is a weakness related to social norms?
It may confuse failure to function with deviation from social norms, risking discrimination against those with alternative lifestyles.
27
What is the issue with subjective judgments?
Judging distress can be subjective, though tools like the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale aim to make it more objective.
28
How might labelling be a limitation?
Labelling someone as “failing to function” might worsen their situation, e.g., after job loss, and impact future opportunities.
29
Who proposed criteria for ideal mental health?
Marie Jahoda (1958).
30
What are Jahoda’s criteria for good mental health?
• No symptoms or distress. • Rational and accurate self-perception. • Self-actualisation. • Coping with stress. • Realistic worldview. • Good self-esteem, no guilt. • Independence. • Ability to work, love and enjoy leisure.
31
How is this definition different from others?
It focuses on what makes someone psychologically healthy rather than what makes them abnormal.
32
What is a strength of this definition?
It is comprehensive and covers a wide range of factors, making it a useful tool for assessing mental health.
33
What is a limitation due to cultural relativism?
Jahoda’s criteria are based on Western individualist values and may not apply to collectivist cultures.
34
Why is the standard set by this definition considered unrealistic?
Very few people meet all the criteria at once, so most of us would be considered abnormal.
35
How can this definition be both positive and negative?
Positive: Helps people recognise areas for improvement. Negative: May be unhelpful for identifying who genuinely needs treatment.