DEONTOLOGY Flashcards

(85 cards)

1
Q

Is a moral philosophy that focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, rather than their
consequences.

A

DEONTOLOGY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

It is based on rules, duties, and moral principles, emphasizing that some actions are inherently right or wrong regardless of their outcomes.

A

DEONTOLOGY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

deon means

A

“duty”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“duty” means

A

“science”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

is derived from the Greek:
deon = “duty”
logos = “science”

A

deontology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The morality of human act depends on whether it fulfills a

A

duty or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

It uses rules to distinguish right from wrong.

A

deontology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

It is our duty to do the

A

right actions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

THIS REFERS TO AN INDIVIDUAL’S MORAL OBLIGATION TO ACT ACCORDING TO MORAL LAW, REGARDLESS OF PERSONAL DESIRES OR EXTERNAL CONSEQUENCES.

A

SENSE OF DUTY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

WHICH MEANS
DOING SOMETHING BECAUSE IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO, NOT BECAUSE OF ANY
BENEFIT OR PERSONAL INCLINATION.

A

GOOD WILL,

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ACCORDING TO KANT, AN ACTION HAS MORAL WORTH ONLY IF IT
IS PERFORMED

A

FROM DUTY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

THIS MEANS THAT EVEN IF AN ACTION PRODUCES GOOD OUTCOMES, IT IS TRULY MORAL ONLY IF IT IS

A

DONE OUT OF A SENSE OF DUTY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ACCORDING TO KANT, AN ACTION HAS ——– ONLY IF IT
IS PERFORMED FROM DUTY, NOT JUST IN ACCORDANCE WITH DUTY. THIS MEANS
THAT EVEN IF AN ACTION PRODUCES GOOD OUTCOMES, IT IS TRULY MORAL ONLY IF
IT IS DONE OUT OF A SENSE OF DUTY, RATHER THAN OUT OF SELF-INTEREST,
EMOTIONS, OR EXTERNAL PRESSURES.

A

MORAL WORTH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

IF YOU ACT OUT OF A SENSE OF DUTY ⇒ YOUR ACTION HAS

A

MORAL WORTH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

a German philosopher, who lived in the quiet
town of Konigsberg, Prussia (now Kaliningrad, Russia).

A

Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

From his belief that humans possess the ability to reason and understand
universal moral laws that they can apply in all situations.

A

Immanuel Kant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

From his belief that humans possess the ability to

A

reason and understand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

is often credited with founding deontological ethics, a moral theory that emphasizes duties and rules as the basis for moral action, rather than the consequences of actions.

A

Immanuel Kant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

His work in ethics is
central to his broader philosophical project, which aims to establish a
foundation for human knowledge, morality, and freedom.

A

Immanuel Kant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

KANT DISTINGUISHES BETWEEN TWO TYPES OF
IMPERATIVES

A

HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVE
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Based on personal goals or desires.

A

HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Morality is conditional—you only follow the rule if
you have the goal.

A

HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

subjective rules for acting that are used to navigate
the world, solve problems, and pursue various ends.

A

HYPOTHETICAL IMPERATIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

It serves as a test for determining whether an action
is morally right.

A

CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Based on moral duty, not personal desires.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
26
Commands you to do something
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
27
Morality is universal—applies to everyone, regardless of circumstances.
CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE
28
“Act only according to that maxim whereby you can, at the same time, will that it should become a universal law.”
Principle of Universalizability
29
the principle where the Act only on rules that you would accept as laws for everyone to follow.
Principle of Universalizability
30
principle where the “Act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of another, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means.”
PRINCIPLE OF HUMANITY
31
CAN BE CONTRASTED TO KINGDOM OF MEANS
KINGDOM OF ENDS
32
KINGDOM OF ENDS CAN BE CONTRASTED TO
KINGDOM OF MEANS
33
here, Everyone is treated with respect and dignity, like they matter.
KINGDOM OF ENDS
34
is Kant’s vision of a perfectly moral society where everyone follows universal ethical principles and treats others with respect.
KINGDOM OF ENDS
35
People are used like tools to get what someone wants.
KINGDOM OF MEANS
36
is a hypothetical society where people are treated as mere tools for others' benefit, rather than as individuals with dignity and intrinsic worth.
KINGDOM OF MEANS
37
In this unethical system, moral rules are ignored when inconvenient, and actions are driven by self-interest, power, or manipulation instead of duty and universal moral principles.
KINGDOM OF MEANS
38
“The Idea of the will of every rational being as a will that legislates universal law.”
AUTONOMY FORMULATION
39
Every rational person should follow reason (autonomy) rather than external influences (heteronomy).
AUTONOMY FORMULATION
40
“True freedom lies in aligning actions with rational, self-imposed principles rather than external forces or desires”
AUTONOMY FORMULATION
41
In here, You are not just following rules—you are a rational moral agent who gives yourself the law. You act morally because you choose to, freely and rationally— not because someone forces you.
AUTONOMY FORMULATION
42
The will is governed by external influencesz, such as emotions, desires, or external authorities.
HETERONOMY
43
Being governed or influenced by external forces, laws, or authorities rather than self-imposed principles.
HETERONOMY
44
The will is self-governing and follows universal moral law that it legislates for itself.
AUTONOMY
45
Every rational person should act as if their actions could become a universal law that everyone must follow.
AUTONOMY
46
Moral actions are truly moral only if they come from duty, not from ------
external influence or desire
47
Moral law is imposed from an external source (e.g., societal rules, divine command).
EXTERNALIST
48
View that the justification or meaning of a belief or mental state depends on factors external to the individual’s mind.
EXTERNALIST
49
Moral law is derived from within the rational agent, based on reason alone.
INTERNALIST
50
View emphasizing that justification for beliefs or reasons for actions must come from factors internal to the individual, such as their mental states, awareness, or desires.
INTERNALIST
51
If morality is based on hypothetical imperatives, it depends on external conditions or ends.
HYPOTHETICAL → EXTERNALIST
52
If morality is based on categorical imperatives, it comes from reason itself.
CATEGORICAL → INTERNALIST
53
focuses on Consistency and fairness
Universal Formulation
54
Main Question to Ask in Universal Formulation
"What if everyone did this?"
55
focuses on Respect for persons
Humanity Formulation
56
Main Question to Ask in Humanity Formulation
"Am I treating others as ends, not just as means?"
57
focuses on Moral freedom and responsibility
Autonomy Formulation
58
Main Question to Ask in Autonomy Formulation
"Am I choosing this action freely and rationally?"
59
is a thought experiment where you design teh rules of society without knowing your own place in it. You don't know if you'll be rich or poor, strong or weak, or what race, gender, or abilities you'll have
Rawl's veil of ignorance or A theory of Justice (1971)
60
This ignorance fores them to design rules and institutions impartiality, without bias or self-interest
Rawl's beil of ignorance
61
FOR MORALITY TO HAVE MEANING, THREE IMPORTANT THINGS MUST EXIST:
FREE WILL IMMORTALITY OF THE SOUL GOD’S EXISTENCE
62
We must have the ability to make our own choices. If we were forced to act in a certain way, we couldn’t be held responsible for our actions. True morality requires freedom.
Free Will
63
Since perfect happiness(summum bonum) is not always achieved in this life, there must be an afterlife where good people can be properly rewarded. Without an afterlife, moral actions might seem pointless.
Immortality of the Soul
64
perfect happiness
(summum bonum)
65
(summum bonum)
perfect happiness
66
There must be a fair and just judge who ensures that moral people are rewarded and immoral people are held accountable.
God’s Existence
67
he believed that only God could provide this justice, making his existence necessary for morality to be complete
Immanuel Kant
68
5 PROOFS OF GOD’S EXISTENCE
1.The Argument from Motion 2. The Argument from Causation 3. The Argument from Contingency 4. The Argument from Degree 5. The Argument from Design (Teleological Argument)
69
Everything in motion was moved by something else. There must be a First Mover that set everything into motion, and this is God
The Argument from Motion
70
Every effect has a cause. There cannot be an infinite chain of causes, so there must be a First Cause that is uncaused—this is God.
The Argument from Causation
71
All things in the universe are contingent (they could exist or not exist). But if everything were contingent, nothing would exist. So, there must be a Necessary Being that has always existed— God.
The Argument from Contingency
72
We recognize degrees of qualities (good, true, noble). These imply a maximum of such qualities. The ultimate standard or maximum is God.
The Argument from Degree
73
Non-intelligent things act toward an end or purpose. This directedness suggests the guidance of an Intelligent Designer, which is God.
The Argument from Design (Teleological Argument)
74
4 STRENGTHS OF DEONTOLOGY
Clear and Logical Respects Human Dignity Fair and Equal Focuses on Intentions–
75
It gives clear rules to follow.
Clear and Logical
76
It teaches us to treat others with respect.
Respects Human Dignity
77
The same rules apply to everyone, no special treatment.
Fair and Equal
78
It values doing good for the right reasons, not for rewards.
Focuses on Intentions
79
4 WEAKNESSES OF DEONTOLOGY
Too Strict Ignores Consequences Hard to Apply Too Idealistic
80
It does not allow exceptions, even in extreme situations.
Too Strict
81
Sometimes, bad consequences can come from following a rule.
Ignores Consequences
82
In real life, some moral rules can conflict with each other.
Hard to Apply
83
It assumes everyone can always act morally, which is not always realistic.
Too Idealistic
84
is centered on duty and rational moral laws. For him, an action is morally right not because of what it achieves, but because it is done out of respect for duty.
Kant’s ethics
85
We should follow moral rules that we can
universalize