DEPTH STUDIES: To what extent did reforms made by Alex II improve the status of Russian Peasants? Flashcards
(8 cards)
1
Q
What were the lives of peasants like prior to the Emancipation Edict 1861?
A
- Peasants were the property of land owners.
- They had no right to land.
- Had to seek permission from the noble which owned their land to marry.
2
Q
What were the conditions laid in the Emancipation Edict 1861?
A
- All privately owned serfs freed - they were able to own property, run their own commercial enterprises and marry who they wished.
- Nobles had to hand over a proportion of their land to peasants.
- State provided emancipation to land owners.
- Peasants had to help pay for compensation through redemption payments.
3
Q
When were state serfs freed?
A
- 1866.
4
Q
What were the terms of the redemption payments placed on peasants?
A
- To be paid over a 49 year period at a 6% interest rate.
- Alternatively the peasants had to continue to work on the land of a noble for so many days to compensate for their own land allocations.
5
Q
Who were redemption payments administered by?
A
- The Mir.
- the group also ensured that land could not be sold before the final redemption payment had been made.
6
Q
By 1905, how much had the proportion of land owned by the nobility decreased to?
A
- 40%.
7
Q
Why was their opposition to emancipation from landowners?
A
- Nobility had been struggling to pay off their loans to help cover day-to-day costs.
- Revenue from redemption payments tended to be diverted to pay debts.
- If this failed then estates were broken up and sold off.
8
Q
What opposition was there from peasants to the emancipation edict?
A
- Peasants were generally allocated poorer quality land - they receive less on average than they had been farming prior to the emancipation edict.
- Peasants struggled to earn enough to meet redemption payments - financial situation made worse by the necessity to pay the rural poll tax.
- Peasants were not totally free as they had to answer to the Mir - decision on which crops were to be cultivated still decided by the village elders/
- It was also the Mir’s responsibility to promote subsistence farming - no incentive for peasants to create a surplus and therefore were reluctant to invest and improve their land.