Diminished Responsibility Flashcards

(19 cards)

1
Q

Act and Section number

A

s.52 Coroners and Justices Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Definition

A

‘ Where a person who kills or is a party to the killing of another is not to be convicted of murder if that person was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 Required things to plead DR

A

(A) Arose from a medical condition
(B) Substantially impaired D’s ability to do one or more of the following:
To understand the nature of the conduct
To form a rational judgement
To exercise self control
(C) Provides an explanation for D’s acts and omissions in doing or being a party to the
killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What will the Objective test show

A

would show when compared to a reasonable person they would be abnormal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Byrne

A

The ability to exercise willpower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Fairweather

A

being on the autistic spectrum will be considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a key point for medical conditions

A

This could include emerging conditions not yet fully recognised - Battered Women’s Syndrome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Martin

A

Paranoid personality disorder and depression count as a recognised medical condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Brennan

A

If two doctors agree on the recognised medical condition - then murder has to be withdrawn from the jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Browns

A

Abnormality had to be more than trivial contribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Golds

A

juries can get help in what substantial is

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Provides An Explanation For D’s Act And Omissions

A

Should be a significant factor, may not be the only cause
Defence should not succeed when the mental condition made no difference
Casual link must be required - but for the abnormality of mental functioning D would have mot acted as he did

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Osbourne

A

ADHD could be a defence but did substantially impair his mental responsibility at the time of killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Alcohol and Diminished Responsibility

A

Alcohol consumed by D cannot be ignored entirely as it states that the abnormality of mud does not have to be the sole cause
Even if he would not have killed but for the alcohol would still provide a defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R v Dietschmann

A

Was really drunk and had depression and killed someone. Was held he was able to plead Dr as his abnormality of mind would still be there even if he was sober

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Key points for Alcohol and ADS

A

The effects of alcohol does not amount to DR but a recognised condition caused by alcohol could
Dependency syndrome is an abnormality and is recognised

17
Q

R v Wood

A

D had alcohol dependency syndrome and killed someone and the effect of alcohol dependency should be looked at

18
Q

R v Dowds

A

Acute voluntary intoxication is a medical condition but not a defence

19
Q

R v Joyce

A

A mental abnormality can not arise from involuntary intoxication