diminished responsibility Flashcards

(13 cards)

1
Q

What is the intro?

A

The defendant may have a defence of diminished responsibility under s.2 of the Homicide Act 1957 as amended by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. This is a partial defence which reduces the offence of murder to voluntary manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many elements are there?

A

5

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the first element of DR? CASE?

A

Firstly, under s2(1), D must suffer from an abnormality of mental functioning, which means that D’s mental function was so different from that of an ordinary human being that a reasonable man would call it abnormal. ( Byrne)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the second element?

A

Secondly, under s.2(1)(a) the AMF must arise from a recognised medical condition, mental or physical. expert medical evidence will be required. (brennan)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

case for learning difficulties/cognitive impairment.

A

Speake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

case for psychopathy, paranoia, and personality disorder?

A

Bryne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

case for epilepsy, stress, depression

A

R v Seers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

case for premenstrual syndrome

A

reynolds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

case for battered woman syndrome

A

ahluwalia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the third element?

A

Thirdly, under s.2 (1)(A) the AMF must substantially impair D’s ability to understand his own conduct, form a rational judgment or exercise self-control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the fourth element?case?

A

Fourth, there must be a substantial impairment under s2(1)(b). In R v Golds, substantially impaired was defined as a serious degree of impairment and should be left to the jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the fifth element?

A

The last element is that under s.2(1)(c), the AMF must provide an explanation for Ds’ conduct. This means there must be a causal link between the AMF and the act. It need not be the only cause, but must have made a significant contribution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intoxication in DR

A

Voluntary is not enough to constitute DR
If intoxication is ignored and the amf arises from a medically recognised condition that substantially impaired the defendant’s conduct, then they may have a defense.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly