Dinmished Responsibility Flashcards

1
Q

I - D (name) may be able to argue the defence of voluntary manslaughter, specifically __ __.

A

1) diminished responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

D - Section __ Coroners and Justice __ 2009 defines diminished responsibility as having a 3 __ test.

A

1) 52
2) act
3) stage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

E - STAGE 1 - The D must be __ from an ___ of mental __ which arose from a recognised ___ condition.

A

1) suffering
2) abnormality
3) functioning
4) medical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Byrne defined an abnormality of mental __ as “a state of __ so different from that of ___ human beings that the reasonable ___ would term it abnormal”.

A

1) functioning
2) mind
3) ordinary
4) person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Severe depression

A

(Seers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PMT

A

(Smith)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Battered Wives Syndrome

A

(Hobson)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Epilepsy

A

(Campbell)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Paranoia/personality disorder

A

(Martin)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Irresistible impulses

A

(Byrne)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Alcohol Dependency Syndrome
A - APPLY the relevant “abnormality” to the scenario

A

(Stewart)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

E - STAGE 2 the ___ of mental functioning must have __ impaired D’s ability to understand the ___ of their ___, form ___ judgments, OR exercise __-__.

A

1) abnormality
2) substantially
3) nature
4) conduct
5) rational
6) self-control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Substantial ___ must be “___, not trivial” (___)
A - APPLY the relevant one(s) to the scenario

A

1) impairment
2) weighty
3) golds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

E - STAGE 3 states the abnormality must be the __ for the __.

A

1) reason
2) killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

s.2 (1) (B) (Amended) Homicide Act 19__. The abnormality must be a ___ contributory factor in the ___ of V. (meaning D only killed because of their ___)
A - APPLY to the scenario

A

1) 1957
2) significant
3) killing
4) abnormality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

SIDE RULE: Intoxication - Is the D was __ at the time of the killing? If so, IGNORE THE INTOXICATION - would the D have still __ if they were not intoxicated? - (Diet____) TIP: if you use this side rule, also use intoxication as a defence.

A

1) intoxicated
2) killed
3) dietschmann