DISBARMENT PROCEEDING Flashcards
(45 cards)
T/F. The power to discipline a lawyer is judicial in nature and can be exercised ONLY by the Courts.
True. Not defeated by the other two departments. See Andres v. Cabrera
T/F. Disbarment must be exercised with great caution, and only in a clear case of misconduct that seriously affects the standing and character of the lawyer as an officer of the Court and as members of the bar.
True. See Ventura v. Samson
Eight forms of disciplinary measures by the Supreme Court. WARCSDIP
- Warning
- Admonition
- Reprimand
- Censure
- Suspension
- Disbarment
- Interim Suspension
- Probation
An act of putting one on his guard against an impending danger, evil, consequence or penalty
Warning
A gentle reproof, mild rebuke, warning reminder or counselling on fault, error or oversight
Admonition
A public and formal censure or severe reproof, administered to a person at fault by his superior officer or the body to which he belongs
Reprimand
Official reprimand
Censure
Temporary withholding of a lawyer’s right to practice his profession for a certain or indefinite period
Suspension
Act of the SC of withdrawing from an attorney the right to practice law
Disbarment
Temporary suspension of a lawyer he practice of law pending imposition of clinical discipline
Interim Suspension
A sanction that allows a lawyer to practice law under specified circumstances
Probation
Five powers of lower Courts in relation to Discipline Lawyers? SWARP.
- Suspend an attorney from practice for any causes under Section 27, Rule 138
- Warn
- Admonish
- Reprimand
- Probation
T/F. The CA and RTC can disbar a lawyer.
NO. Only the Supreme Court.
Seven other sanctions and remedies. RARAROL
- Restitution
- Assessment of costs.
- Limitation upon practice
- Appointment of a receiver
- Requirement that a lawyer take the bar examination or professional responsibility examination
- Requirement that a lawyer attend continuing education courts
- Other requirements.
Five factors to be considered in imposing lawyer sanctions
- Duty violated
- Mental state
- Actual and potential injury caused
- Aggravating and mitigating factors
Ten aggravating factors
- Prior disciplinary offenses
- Dishonest and selfish
- Pattern of misconduct
- Multiple offenses
- Bad faith obstruction of the disciplinary proceeding
- Submission of false evidence, false statements or other deceptive practices
- Refusal to acknowledge wrongful nature
- Vulnerability of the victim
- Substantial experience in the practice of law
- Indifference to making a restitution.
Seventeen mitigating circumstances
- Good faith
- Inexperience
- Age
- Apology
- Lack of unlawful intent
- Absence of prior disciplinary record
- Absence of dishonest or selfish motive
- Personal or emotional problems
- Timely good faith effort to make restitution or to rectify consequences of misconduct
- Full and free disclosure to disciplinary board
- Character or reputation
- Physical or mental disability
- Delay in disciplinary proceedings
- Interim rehabilitation
- Imposition of other penalties or sanctions
- Remorse
- Remoteness of prior offenses
T/F. Admin cases against lawyers are sui generis. They are distinct from and may proceed independently from civil and criminal cases
True. See Re: Almacen
Six goals of disbarment and suspension
- Compel fair and honest dealings
- Remove from the profession person proven to have misconduct
- Punish lawyer
- Set an example or warning to other members
- Safeguard the admin o justice from dishonest lawyers
- Protect public
T/F. There is a prescriptive period of ten years to file an admin complaint against an erring lawyer
True. See Heirs of Falame v. Atty. Baguio
T/F. A lawyer can be disbarred more than twice
False. See Yuhico v. Atty Guiterrez
Eight grounds for suspension or disbarment
- Deceit
- Malpractice
- Grossly immoral conduct
- Conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude
- Violation of oath of office
- Willful disobedience of any lawful order
- Corrupt or willful appearance as an attorney
- Non-payment of IBP dues
Consists of failure of an attorney to use such skill, prudence and diligence as a lawyer of ordinary skill and capacity commonly possess and exercise in the performance of tasks which they undertake, and when such failure proximately causes damages, it gives rise to an action in tort.
Legal malpractice. See Tan Tek Beng v. David.
Any inexcusable, shameful, or flagrant unlawful conduct on the part of the person concerned in the administration of justice which is PREJUDICAL TO THE RIGHTS OF THE PARTIES or to the RIGHT DETERMINATION of a cause; conduct that is generally MOTIVATED by premediated, obstinate, or intentional purpose
Gross misconduct. See Yumol Jr. v. Ferrer.