Dispute Resolution Flashcards
Litigation
Using the courts to progress a claim, eventually to trial if it can’t be resolved first
Benefits of litigation
- Certainty of outcome
- Merits assessed by a judge
- Create a binding precedent
Disadvantages of litigation
- Exepense
- Restrictions on remedies
- Antagonistic
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Mediation, negotiation and arbitration
Mediation and negotiation can be a standalone alternative to litigation or part of litigation when parties take time out to settle dispute
Arbitration is only an alternative to litigation
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Mediation, negotiation and arbitration
Mediation and negotiation can be a standalone alternative to litigation or part of litigation when parties take time out to settle dispute
Arbitration is only an alternative to litigation
Refusal to engage in ADR
Courts has no power to order parties to engage in ADR
BUT the court can restrict the costs of the party that unreasonably refused to engage in ADR e.g. defendant may not have to pay any costs that arose after the proposed mediation which the claimant refused to engage in and potentially the claimant may have to pay the defendants costs over that period
Litigation general rule: unsuccessful party must pay the successful party’s legal costs
Arbitration
Parties agree by contract to appoint one neutral third party (arbitrator) to resolve the dispute (can agree to be more than one arbitrator)
Parties agree to the rules that the arbitration will follow in terms of (the arbitration clause):
- How the arbitrator should be appointed, - Where the hearing will take place
- The rules of evidences
Arbitrator determines matters of fact and law in accordance with the rules agreed between the parties
A party can request the court to not progress the claim (granting a stay) on the basis the parties have entered a binding agreement to arbitrate BUT both parties can agree to dispense with arbitration and use litigation
Mediation
Mediator is appointed by the parties as a neutral whose role it is to help the parties come to an agreement
Mediator = facilator
No requirement for mediator to be legally qualified and don’t need to have any technical knowledge of the area in dispute
Mediator has licence to explore issues that a judge or arbitrator does not e.g. how one party’s behaviour has made the other feels
Overriding objective of CPR
Deal with cases fairly and proportionately
Pre-action considerations: limitation periods
Breach of contract claims: 6 years
Construction claims (based on building defects after 6 year contract period has lapsed): 3 years from date claimant knew or ought to have known material facts to bring a claim against the builder BUT no claims after 15 years (long stop date)
Tort claims for personal injury and death: 3 years
All other tort claims: 6 years
Defamation claims: 1 year
Unfair dismissal claims: 3 months
When does the time period starts and stops for the purposes of calculating limitation periods?
Tort claims:
Start: day after the tortious act occurred or the day after the date of knowledge Stop: day claimant delivers claim form to the court
Exception: clinical negligence - time period begins on the claimant’s date of knowledge
Contract claims:
Start: day after the date of breach
Stop: day claimant delivers claim form to the court
Once the limitation period expires the claimant cannot make amendments to their claim such as adding a new defendant but minor amendments to reflect incorrect spelling of names is allowed
Limitation periods: special cases
Minors: begins on 18th birthday
Mental incapacity: begins when incapacity is removed
Fraud or concealment: begins when discovered or when should have been discovered
Mistake; begins when discovered or when should have been discovered
Purpose of pre-action protocol
To obtain information to:
- Negotiate
- Settle
-Lay ground for proceedings if settlement is not achievable
Practice direction on pre-action conduct and protocols (standard)
Steps:
1. Claimant: write to defendant with concise details of claim
2. Defendant responds in reasonable time (14 days for straightforward case/ 3 months max in complex case)
3. Disclosure of key documents
4. Court permission required for expert evidence (parties should consider a single joint expert if expert necessary)
5. Parties consider alternative dispute resolution
6. Take stock of positions before court action e.g. in best interests to commence proceedings
Specific protocols
Personal injury protocol
- Applies to claims up to £25,000 and excludes low value road traffic accidents (less than £25,000)
Specific steps in additional to the standard protocol :
1.Letter of claim must identify hospital and request details of defendant’s insurer
2. Parties should jointly select an expert who will prepare a report for the claimant which they must disclose to the defendant
Key differences from standard protocol:
- Parties can disapply protocol by agreement BUT need to show good reason
- Claimant needs to indicate in letter of claim if they wish to appoint protocol referee
- Parties should meet within 21 days of defendants response to narrow issues
Construction and engineering protocol includes residential building work e.g. new bath fitted
Failure to comply with protocol
- Sanctions
a. Adverse cost consequences once case is concluded e.g. may not be allowed to recover costs if claim is successful but refused defendants offer of ADR
BUT in certain cases it is justified to issue a claim without following the pre-action protocol
Pre-action applications
- Pre-action disclosure: request for relevant documents in the control of another party MUST be shown disclosure is necessary to investigate claim properly
- Pre-action inspection of property: must be shown that the property is relevant to the issues in the proceedings
Costs
Unsuccessful party pays for successful party’s costs - applies to costs incurred following the pre-action protocol
If parties resolve dispute during pre-action protocol period it is up to parties to agree costs as part of settlement
If parties can’t agree how to resolve dispute during pre-action protocol stage but claimant decides not to issue claim the defendant can’t recover their costs incurred in complying with protocol
Starting a claim
- Complete claim form and send to court
- Court issues claim - this stops time for limitation purposes
Selecting the correct court
High court: claims of £100,000+ or £50,000+ for personal injury cases OR if claim ought to be dealt with by High Court judge
Reasons to start claim in high court:
1. Value of claim/amount in dispute
2. Complexity of facts, legal issues, remedies or procedures involved
3. Importance of outcome to public in general
Simple claims even if £100,000+ won’t be suitable for issue in High Court
All other cases heard in county court (most)
Exceptions:
Claims of significant public interest even if below £100,000 may be issued in the High Court and vice versa
Types of county court claims and their processes
Claim for debts owed (specified claims) are issued by completing an online claim form (money claim form) which are then issued by a virtual court (County Court Money Claims Centre)
Claims for damages (unspecified claims) are issued by completing a standard claims form (N1), defendant files defence statement, claim issued in the county court closest to the defendants home address or if defendant is a company then the claimants nearest county court