Divisions Over Religion: Arminianism And Laudianism; Puritanism And Millenarianism To 1640 Flashcards
(22 cards)
What was Charles’ approach to religion?
- was not committed to being a peacemaker
- committed to tolerating catholics - mainly due to his marriage to Henrietta Maria
- Charles aimed to bring about far reaching reform of the Church of England which caused grave disquiet among the puritans + political nation
What were the key beliefs of Arminians?
- bishops are essential to ensure the church is governed appropriately and provides effective support for the king
- believed that the reformation went too far + that some aspects of Catholicism are essential in the Church of England
- beauty of holiness
-ceremony, order and ritual - dismiss the Calvinist idea of pre destination
Why did Charles promote laudianism?
-eager to overthrow the Elizabethan compromise
-wanted to unite people within a uniform national church
- fear of Puritanism
When was laud promoted as bishop of London?
1628
When was laud promoted as Archbishop of Canterbury?
- 1633
What were some laudian measures?
- communion table moved and railed off as an altar in the east end of the church
- increased emphasis on ceremony
- decorations such as stained glass windows
- increased use of music in services
- ministers wearing vestments instead of plain robes
How were the laudian measures imposed?
- enforced through visitations + ecclesiastical courts
- bishop visitations focused on inspecting the physical aspects of the church and performance of the ministers
When was the book of sports reissued?
- 1633
-imposed to counter pressure that was put on puritan dominated areas, eg Lancashire to abstain from participating in fun activities on Sundays (the sabbath) - authorised a range of sports eg morris dancing
- clergy who failed to read the reissue could be expelled from their position, or even face imprisonment
How did Charles play a role in imposing laudian measures during personal rule?
- presence of a range of catholics at court + access they had to Charles made the puritans believe he was influenced by them
- puritans also believed the king was being influenced by his Catholic wife
How were the laudian reforms imposed in 1640?
- through church laws called canon laws were passed to codify laud’s measures
Why was the rise of Laud so problematic?
- Laud became not just a religious figure, but also a highly influential political one (became archbishop, became a member of the privy council + was also a member of the star chamber)
-this mirrored the situation in France + Spain = where secular roles were regularly being given to bishops - created fears that Charles was aiming to install a continental style absolutism in England
Who were the puritans?
- a hotter form of Protestants - shared beliefs with calvinists and Presbyterians
- common focus : importance of the bible + hatred for catholics + different measures of millenarianism
How did the Protestants change during the 1630s?
- many Protestants increasingly concerned with the direction Charles’ religious reforms were taken, so they became more connected to the Puritan position
What was the 1633 St Gregory’s case?
- example of puritan opposition during personal rule
-parishioners at st Gregory;’s church in London the moving of their communism table to the east end of the church - the moving of the communion table sometimes also meant that family pews had to be removed which caused offence
- richly decorated cloths on the table was also a reminder of lingering Catholic influences
-parishioners were brought forward by the privy council as a test case for Charles
What happened with John Williams in 1637?
- example of puritan opposition to Charles during personal rule
- William’s was imprisoned for publishing a criticism of the moving of the altars in “The Holy Table, Name and Thing”
- Williams argued that even the terminology “altar” was problematic - heavily Catholic
What happened with the case of Prynne, Burton and Bastwick in 1637?
- example of puritan opposition
- Prynne, Bastwick and Burton were brought before the court of star chamber for their criticism of church policy
- the three men were found guilty of criticising laudian reforms
-each fined £5000 + imprisoned for life - however their ears were publicly cut of which caused sympathy - mainly for their well respected job prospects rather than the punishment
What was Charles’ aim in Scotland?
- conformity
- wanted to align the Presbyterian Church of Scotland with the laudian Church of England and reform its prayer book and practices
What did Charles pass in Scotland in 1625?
- act of revocation: feudal right to take land from the Scottish elite to support the church in Scotland - immediate outcome was that it united landowners against Charles as he posed a threat to their power
- articles of Perth; called for kneeling at communion, observance of holy days etc
What did the 1636 canons in Scotland state?
- based on the articles of Perth
- the altar had to be placed against the east wall of the chancel
- ministers had to wear a surplice when they celebrated communion
- improvised prayer book was banned; ministers had to read from the new prayer book
- all these canons were interpreted as a return to Catholicism + Charles made no attempt to allow the general assembly of the Kirk of Scotland or the Scottish Parliament to have any say
When was the laudian prayer book introduced in Scotland?
- 1637
- imposed without consulting the Scottish Kirk or parliament
- threatened religious independence in Scotland
- triggered a conflict at St Giles cathedral; which started the Scottish rebellion
What was the emergence of millenarianism?
- millenarianism was a belief in the end of the world - important to English porters at
- believed that the political crisis was part of the events that heralded the end of the world
- they feared judgement day was near
-this belief gave some puritans a reason to take on more political and public roles in the late 1630s