Doppler Flashcards
(53 cards)
Components of the Doppler equation include all the following EXCEPT:
A. The angle between the ultrasound beam and the direction of blood flow must be known for accurate measurement of blood flow.
B. The transmitted ultrasound frequency is an important determinant of the Doppler shift detected.
C. Propagation speed of sound changes relative to the velocity of the red blood cells.
D. The cosine of 0° is 1 and it is assumed in echocardiography that the recorded velocity has been obtained at a near-parallel intercept angle.
C. The Doppler equation relates the change in frequency of transmitted ultrasound as it is backscattered from moving red blood cells:
FD = 2 x FT x [(V x cos 0) ÷ C]
The equation can be solved for velocity:
V = (FD x C) ÷ (2 x FT x cos 0)
FD, Doppler frequency;
FT, transmitted frequency;
V, velocity of red blood cells;
0, angle between the direction of the moving target and the path of the ultrasound beam;
C, velocity of sound in soft tissue;
2, the constant
The difference between the transmitted frequency and the reflected frequency is known as the:
A. Bernoulli equation
B. Doppler principle
C. Doppler shift
D. Gorlin equation
C. With Doppler echocardiography high frequency ultrasound (2 to 5 MHz) is reflected off moving red blood cells. The Doppler shift provides information concerning the direction and velocity of blood flow within the heart and great vessels and is expressed in Hertz (Hz).
The top normal peak velocity for the aortic valve is:
A. 0.7 m/s
B. 0.9 m/s
C. 1.1 m/s
D. 1.7 m/s
D. The normal maximal velocities in adults are:
Tricuspid: 0.3 to 0.7 m/s
Pulmonary artery: 0.6 to 0.9 m/s
Mitral: 0.6 to 1.3 m/s
LVOT: 0.7 to 1.1 m/s
Aortic valve: 1.0 to 1.7 m/s
Minor degrees of tricuspid regurgitation and mitral regurgitation detected by Doppler in structurally normal hearts:
A. Are a common finding
B. Are a rare finding
C. Depend on respiration
D. Vary greatly from one echocardiography laboratory to another
A. Minor degrees of tricuspid regurgitation that may be found by Doppler have a reported prevalence of up to 90% and up to 50% for mitral regurgitation. This condition appears to depend on the patient’s age and physical conditioning.
The peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation may be used to determine the right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and the systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP).
Pulmonary regurgitation as detected by Doppler in structurally normal hearts is:
A. A rare finding
B. A common finding
C. An abnormal finding
D. Dependent upon expiration
B. Pulmonary regurgitation has been reported in up to 90% of patients with normal valve leaflets and structurally normal hearts.
The pulmonary regurgitation end-diastolic velocity may be used to determine the pulmonary artery end-diastolic pressure (PAEDP). The peak velocity of the pulmonary regurgitation may be used to determine the mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP).
The laminar core of a turbulent jet is called the:
A. Flow convergence region (PISA)
B. Vena contracta
C. Turbulent region
D. Relaminarization
B. Each turbulent jet has four characteristics. The flow convergence region where blood flow “gathers up” proximal to the orifice. The vena contracta is where blood flow becomes uniform as it passes through the orifice. The turbulent region where blood flow becomes chaotic and the relaminarization zone where laminar flow is restored.
In the echocardiography laboratory, the flow convergence region is called the PISA (proximal isovelocity surface area. The PISA may be used to determine the severity of valvular regurgitation.
The vena contracta may be useful in determining the severity of regurgitation (e.g., mitral regurgitation).
The turbulent region appears as a mosaic with color flow Doppler on and is useful when evaluating the severity of mitral regurgitation and tricuspid regurgitation.
Pressure recovery may explain discrepancies between the pressure gradient measurements acquired in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and the pressure gradient measurements acquired in the echocardiography laboratory (e.g., aortic stenosis, prosthetic aortic valve). Pressure recovery occurs at the:
A. Flow convergence region (PISA)
B. Vena contracta
C. Turbulent region
D. Relaminarization zone
D. In abnormal flow the maximum pressure difference occurs at the vena contracta. As blood flow becomes laminar distal to the vena contracta and turbulent region pressure recovers.
Pressure recovery can be an explanation for when cardiac catheterization pressure gradients do not match the pressure gradients determined in the echocardiography laboratory especially when comparing gradients in a patient with aortic stenosis or a prosthetic aortic valve.
As a valve orifice narrows because of stenosis pressure proximal to the stenosis will:
A. Increase
B. Decrease
C. Increase with inspiration, decrease with expiration
D. Equilibrate
A. With valvular stenosis pressure in the chamber proximal to the stenosis will increase as will the velocity of blood flow across the stenosis.
The equation which relates the pressure drop across an area of narrowing is the:
A. Bernoulli equation
B. Continuity equation
C. Doppler equation
D. Velocity ratio equation
A. When a constant volume of blood flow passes through a stenotic site blood flow is accelerated. The resultant decrease in pressure across the stenotic area is related to velocity of the blood flow on the basis of Bernoulli hydrodynamics (equation).
The pressure drop between two-chambers may be calculated by the formula:
A. CSA x VTI
B. 220 ÷ pressure half-time
C. 4 x V22
D. Transmitted frequency - received frequency
CSA, cross-sectional area;
VTI, velocity time integral,
V22, velocity across the obstruction
C. The simplified Bernoulli equation 4 x V22 calculates the pressure gradient between two sites. This simplified equation neglects acceleration of flow, viscous friction and the flow velocity proximal to the peak velocity (V12).
V22, velocity across the obstruction;
V12, velocity proximal to the obstruction
The simplified Bernoulli equation disregards all of the following factors EXCEPT:
A. Flow acceleration
B. Proximal velocity
C. Velocity at the site of obstruction
D. Viscous friction
C. At most pressure gradients encountered in clinical medicine the contributions from viscous friction and flow acceleration are negligible.
The contributions from the velocity proximal to an obstruction are also negligible. Therefore most gradients can be derived from the determination of the velocity blood flow by the simplified Bernoulli equation:
P = 4 x V22
P, pressure gradient between two-chambers in millimeters of mercury;
V22, velocity across the obstruction in meters per second
When evaluating valvular stenosis all of the following are useful
Doppler parameters EXCEPT:
A. Peak velocity
B. Peak instantaneous pressure gradient
C. Mean pressure gradient
D. Chamber dimensions
D. The Bernoulli equation allows for the calculation of the peak
instantaneous pressure gradient (P = 4 x V22). The Bernoulli equation
may be used to determine mean pressure gradient by measuring the velocity at equally spaced points, squaring each velocity, averaging the velocity values and multiplying the average by 4.
The mean pressure gradient may be the most useful parameter when evaluating valvular stenosis. A mean pressure gradient of > 10 mm Hg indicates significant mitral stenosis. A mean pressure gradient of
> 50 mm Hg indicates severe aortic stenosis.
P, pressure gradient between two-chambers in millimeters of mercury;
V22, peak velocity across the obstruction in meters per second
Which of the following represent the lengthened Bernoulli equation?
A. CSA x VTI
B. 4 x V22
C. EDV - ESV
D. 4 x V22 - V12
CSA, cross-sectional area;
V2, velocity across the obstruction; EDV, end-diastolic volume;
ESV, end-systolic volume;
V2, peak velocity proximal to the obstruction
D. Generally the proximal velocity to an obstruction can be ignored and
the simplified Bernoulli equation (P = 4 x V22) can be used to calculate
the peak pressure gradient.
If the proximal velocity is > 1.2 m/s then the lengthened Bernoulli equation should be used:
P= 4 x (V22 - V12)
P, pressure gradient between two-chambers in millimeters of mercury;
V22, peak velocity across the obstruction in meters per second;
V12, peak velocity of flow proximal to the obstruction in meters per second
The formula that is used to calculate the peak pressure gradient in coarctation of the aorta is:
A. 4 (V22 - V12)
B. 4 (V22)
C. 220 ÷ PHT
D. CSA x VTI
V12, velocity proximal to the obstruction;
V22, velocity across the obstruction in meters per second;
PHT, pressure half-time;
CSA, cross-sectional area;
VTI, velocity time integral
A. To best calculate the peak pressure gradient in aortic coarctation, the lengthened Bernoulli equation should be used. The lengthened Bernoulli equation calculates the velocity proximal to the obstruction (V12), which may be increased in coarctation.
A peak velocity of 2 m/s is obtained in a patient with rheumatic mitral stenosis. The peak (maximum) instantaneous pressure gradient is:
A. 2 mm Hg
B. 4 mm Hg
C. 16 mm Hg
D. 26 mm Hg
C. The lengthend Bernoulli equation is:
P= 4 x (V22 - V12)
In mitral valve stenosis the peak velocity on the atrial side of the valve is so low (< 1.2 m/s) that it can be ignored and the pressure drop can be obtained as follows:
P= 4 x V22
P, pressure gradient between two-chambers in millimeters of mercury;
V22, peak velocity across the obstruction in meters per second,
V12, peak velocity of flow proximal to the obstruction in meters
per second
In a patient with aortic stenosis the continuous-wave Doppler recordings demonstrate a maximum peak systolic velocity across the aortic valve of 5 m/s. The peak (maximum) instantaneous pressure gradient is:
A. 5 mm Hg
B. 25 mm Hg
C. 100 mm Hg
D. 110 mm Hg
C. The simplified Bernoulli equation may be applied to velocity measurements to make noninvasive estimates of pressure gradients:
P=4 x V22
For this question: P = 4 × 5^2 = 100
mm Hg
In most cases the peak velocity proximal to the aortic valve will be < 1.2 m/s and therefore the simplified Bernoulli equation may be used.
A peak velocity of 5 m/s and a peak instantaneous pressure gradient of 100 mm Hg in a patient with aortic stenosis and no or only mild aortic regurgitation usually indicate severe aortic stenosis.
In patients with aortic valve stenosis the pressure gradients measured by Doppler include:
A. Peak (maximum) instantaneous pressure gradient and peak-to-peak gradient
B. Peak (maximum) instantaneous pressure gradient
C. Peak-to-peak pressure gradient
D. Peak-to-mean gradient
B. Doppler measures the peak (maximum) instantaneous pressure gradient and additionally measures the peak-to-peak pressure gradien and mean pressure gradient. The Doppler peak instantaneous gradient is usually greater than the catheterization laboratories peak-to-peak pressure gradient.
The Doppler mean pressure gradient and cardiac catheterization mean pressure gradient should be equal.
With aortic valve stenosis and poor global left ventricular systolic function the severity of aortic stenosis by the Doppler pressure gradient may be:
A. Underestimated
B. Overestimated
C. Unaffected
D. Unpredictable
A. Pressure gradients are flow dependent. If there is reduced cardiac output there may be a low peak systolic velocity, peak pressure gradient and mean pressure gradient even in the presence of severe aortic stenosis.
A patient with known aortic stenosis presents for evaluation. The ejection fraction is 22%. The peak velocity across the aortic valve as determined by continuous-wave Doppler is 2.3 m/s. The peak instantaneous pressure gradient is 21 mm Hg. The mean pressure gradient is 14 mm Hg. The severity of the aortic stenosis is:
A. Mild
B. Moderate
C. Severe
D. Requires more information
D. Velocities and pressure gradients are flow dependent. Because the patients ejection fraction is markedly reduced the peak velocity, peak pressure gradient and mean pressure gradient should be interpreted with caution. Calculating the aortic valve area by the continuity equation, improving the global left ventricular systolic function with dobutamine or tracing the aortic valve in the short-axis view of the aortic valve to determine aortic valve area are possible solutions to determining severity.
With aortic valve stenosis and significant aortic regurgitation the severity of the aortic stenosis by the Doppler pressure gradient may be:
A. Overestimated
B. Underestimated
C. Unaffected
D. Unpredictable
A. Because pressure gradient is flow dependent it may be very high in patients in whom aortic valve flow is high (e.g., those with coexistent aortic regurgitation) and stenosis is only moderate. Likewise, a low gradient may be noted, despite the presence of severe stenosis, when cardiac output is low.
Right ventricular systolic pressure may be calculated when the following condition is present:
A. Aortic regurgitation
B. Mitral regurgitation
C. Pulmonary regurgitation
D. Tricuspid regurgitation
D. Utilizing the simplified Bernoulli equation (P = 4 x V22), right ventricular systolic pressure may be calculated when tricuspid regurgitation, ventricular septal defect or patent ductus arteriosus is present. In the absence of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction (e.g., pulmonary stenosis the right ventricular systolic pressure equals the systolic pulmonary artery pressure.
Assuming normal intracardiac pressures, the expected continuous-wave Doppler peak velocity of mitral regurgitation would be:
A. 1 m/s
B. 3 m/s
C. 5 m/s
D. 7 m/s
C. The maximum peak systolic velocity of mitral regurgitation represents the peak pressure difference between the left ventricle and left atrium. Since that difference is usually 100 mm Hg, the peak velocity of mitral regurgitation should be approximately 5 m/s. Due to ranges in blood pressure, the expected normal peak velocity range for the peak velocity of mitral regurgitation is 4 to 6 m/s.
The continuous-wave Doppler maximum aortic regurgitation velocity reflects the:
A. Maximum instantaneous systolic pressure gradient between the aorta and left ventricle
B. Maximum peak instantaneous diastolic pressure difference between the aorta and the left ventricle
C. Mean diastolic pressure gradient between the aorta and left ventricle
D. Mean systolic pressure gradient between the aorta and the left ventricle
B. The maximum diastolic regurgitant velocity reflects the maximum peak instantaneous pressure difference between the diastolic pressure of the aorta and the diastolic left ventricular pressure. Because the early diastolic pressure gradient between the aorta and the left ventricle is high (approximately 70 mm Hg) the peak aortic regurgitation velocity will range from 3 to 5 m/s.
The expected continuous-wave Doppler peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation assuming normal intracardiac pressures is:
A. 0.5 m/s
B. 1.0 m/s
C. 2.2 m/s
D. 3.3 m/s
C. The peak systolic pressure difference between the right ventricle and right atrium is approximately 20 mm Hg which would be expressed by a peak systolic velocity of 1.7 m/s. As pulmonary pressures increase, the right ventricular systolic pressure increases, the peak systolic pressure gradient between the right ventricle and right atrium increases which will result in an increase in the peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation.