Drug Development Flashcards
(43 cards)
Chemical considerations
Electronic effect
Solubility effect
Steric effect
Electronic effect
Resonance
Electronegativity - ability to donate or withdraw electrons
Solubility effect
Water soluble groups
Ionizable groups
Hydrogen bonding
Lipid soluble groups
Steric effect
Bulk and position
Modification close to functional group undergoing metabolic transformation can cause dramatic effect
Acetylcholine rapidly hydrolysed by acetylcholinesterase
Bethanechol is not hydrolysed by acetylcholinesterase as methyl group cannot be accommodated in active site of enzyme
What does the functional group of a drug effect
ADME
Solubility
Shelf life
Target organisms
Other factors affecting drug development
Scientific difficulty - screening of huge libraries of small molecules are not providing new antibiotics
Financial reward
Scale down of research in (big) pharma companies
Loss of “experts”
Socio-economic factors
Toxicology
Pharmacogenetics
ADME
Absorbed
Distributed
Metabolised
Excreted
Average time to market
15 years
Drivers of research
Initial grant funding (BBSRC, EU and EPSRC)
Industrial funding
Can you patent a natural product ?
ED50
Median effective dose
The dose of a medication that produces a specific effect in 50% of the population that takes the dose
Median toxic dose
The dose required to produce a defined toxic effect in 50% of subjects
Median lethal dose
The dose required to kill
Process of development
The initial discovery hit on screen
Characterization purification and Identification of active compounds (HPLC / mass spec)
Measurement of Until microbial activity (MIC)
Measurement of in vitro toxicity (cell culture)(if low toxicity proceed to Galleria)
Measure of in vivo toxicity (Galleria mellonella)if MIC lower that ~30 ug/ml and low toxicity then test in mice)
Measurement of efficacy (Galleria mellonella) (if MIC lower that ~30 ug/ml and low toxicity then test in mice)
Measurement of efficacy mouse thigh model
Identification of a drug molecule - the early antibiotics
In 1909, Paul Ehrlich (also worked with Robert Koch)
He discovered the very first antibiotics “a magic Bullet” , synthetic arsenic-based drugs (Salvarsan 606), in a large screen of hundreds of organoarsenic compounds for use in the treatment of syphili
It targeted the Syphilis bacteria
without damaging the rest of the body
The Idea of the therapeutic window
Identification of penicillin
Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, the first natural product antibiotic, in 1928.
Penicillin was also very difficult to isolate and purify, until the late 1930s. In 1939 by Florey and Chain
Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin elucidated the structure of penicillin in the early 1940’s
Following this discovery, penicillin started to be used systemically as an antibiotic, which then ushered in the golden age of antibiotics.
In 1945, Fleming, Chain, and Florey were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their discovery of penicillin.
Identification of sulfonamides
Gerard Domagk discovered Prontosil, a red dye, while experimenting with azo dyes against bacterial infections in mice in 1935
This led to the synthesis of more than 5000 sulfa drugs between 1935 and 1945
Sulfa drugs are broad-spectrum and work by inhibiting the dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS) enzyme in folate biosynthesis
Waksman platform
Selman Waksman received the Nobel prize in 1952 for his “discovery of streptomycin, the first antibiotic effective against tuberculosis.” Waksman began systematically screening soil microorganisms for antibiotic production, He discovered that soil actinomycetes (streptomycetes) are prodigious producers
The screening method, often called the Waksman platform, involved preparing culture extracts from soil actinomycetes and overlaying filter paper discs infused with these extracts over a test organism on an agar plate, and then looking for zones of growth inhibition
Anti microbial development step one identify in vitro antibacterial activity A simple Primary Screen
Collection of environmental sample
Plate out to culture diverse community
Isolation of pier microorganisms for screening
Isolation of microorganisms
Liquid culture
Extracts on disks
Spheroplast screen
From the 1960s into the 1990s, spheroplast screens were used as a primary method for discovery of antibiotics that inhibit cell wall biosynthesis.
Growing bacteria were exposed to test substances under hypertonic conditions (concentration is higher than that inside the cell).
Inhibitors of cell wall synthesis caused growing bacteria to form spheroplasts. This screen enabled the discovery of fosfomycin, cephamycin C, thienamycin and several carbapenems.
Semi-synthetic antibiotics
First response to bacterial resistance
Highly successful strategy where the natural antibiotic scaffold was modified chemically to produce new antibiotics with higher activity than the original
Express silent or cryptic biosynthetic genes
They are not routinely expressed under standard cultivation conditions, and there are several ongoing efforts to express these silent pathways and examine their products. Many of the following methods can also be used to increase antibiotic yields.
New strategies and techniques for natural products
Less than 1% of the microbes present in the environment can be cultivated in the laboratory.
Traditional cultivation methods allow faster growing species to dominate, and rich medium supplies excess nutrients that may be toxic to oligophilic bacteria.
Many environmental bacteria only make microcolonies that require microscopic identification
A major reason why many species are uncultivatable is that synthetic medium lacks essential nutrients or growth factors that are present in their natural environment
In situ cultivation of previously uncultivable microorganisms using the ichip
Ichip
introduced the diffusion chamber in 2002 for in situ cultivation by Epstein
The chamber allowed growth in pure culture while permitting the free diffusion of nutrients from the native environment.
The ichip consists of hundreds of miniature diffusion chambers that allow parallel in situ cultivation of hundreds of isolates.
Each chamber is inoculated with a single environmental cell
The chip is incubated in situ in the original environment. The method has high recovery rates (close to 50%) but also has recovered novel species.