Duress and Undue Influence Flashcards

1
Q

What is the general rule of setting aside contracts for the courts?

A

Courts are reluctant to put aside contracts just because of a perceived inequality of bargaining power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the exception of this general rule

A

Courts will not allow the strong to take advantage of the weak in the formation of an agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the doctrine of duress and economic duress under common law?

A

when a party is induced to make a contract by force or threat of force to the person, property or financial interests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the doctrine of undue influence under equity?

A

Doctrine of undue influence: seen as improper influence or exploitation of a relationship of influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the remedies available for duress/undue influence?

A

Common law and equity:
* Rescission
Statute:
* Unfair Contract terms Act 2015
* Consumer rights Act 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is bargaining power and its the general rule of inequality of bargaining power?

also explain what inequality of bargaining power is

A
  • Bargaining power: a party’s ability to ensure that the terms of a transaction they enter into serve their own objectives
  • Inequality of bargaining power: one party having a greater ability to do so than the other party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is duress?

A
  • Duress occurs where one of the parties (stronger party), exerts illegitimate/illegal pressure on the other party (victim),
    leaving the other party with no reasonable alternative but to enter that contract
    • Must be a causal link between the coercive conduct and the decision to enter the contract (although that link need not be strong)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the relevance of physical duress in common law?

A
  • Historically first form of duress recognised by common law was physical duress to the person,
  • contract would be treated as voidable, the person who was coerced can set it aside with any money paid being recovered
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Give a case law example of physical duress

A

Barton v Armstrong (1976)

  • Both parties were the major shareholders in a company
  • Following business negotiations, Barton entered into an agreement with Armstrong to buy his shares in the company
  • Later Barton brought an action alleging that Armstrong had coerced him into the agreement by threatening to have him murdered
    ○ There is a causal link between the contract being made and the threat of force

Held:
* Onus on Armstrong to show that the threats made to Barton did not contribute to his decision to sign
* In the circumstances, duress had played a part and Barton was entitled to the relief sought

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is economic duress?

A

Threat to a person’s financial or business interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Give an example of what economic duress can look like in practice

A

e.g. Where one party threatens breach of contract unless the contract is renegotiated and the other agrees to avoid the consequences that may follow from the breach

This has been historically denied and only recognised in recent years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are requirements of duress and what third element did economic duress include?

A

To rescind the contract, Claimant needs to establish:

  • the threat or pressure by the Defendant must have been illegitimate/Illegal;
  • the threat must have caused the claimant to enter the contract

Third element:
* the claimant must have no reasnable alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Give a case law example that paved the way for the development of the concept of economic duress

Include what Kerr J stated in this case

A

The Siboen and The Sibotre [1976]

  • There was a worldwide recession in the shipping industry with the result that the charter rates fallen substantially
  • The charterers (C) of 2 ships renegotiated the rates of the charters, having warned the owners (D) that they would become insolvent unless this was done; also stated that if an action be taken against them for breach of contract no benefit would accrue to D since they had very little assets against which such clam could be made
  • C also knew that D would be highly unlikely (given the recession) that D would be able to recharter the ships if C were to break the contract which would likely force D into liquidation
  • D agreed to reduce their rates but later withdraw both ships from the charter
  • C sued claiming that the contract had been wrongly repudiated, D claimed that they renegotiated the contract only because of duress placed upon them by C

Held - Contract set aside for fraudulent misrep., but D’s claim for duress failed

Kerr J. opened up a possibility for the development of the notion of economic duress but stated that a mere commercial pressure was not sufficient for economic duress to be recognised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Give a case law example of economic duress

A

Universe Tankships of Monrovia v International Transport Workers Federation (The Universe Sentinel) (1983)

  • The Universal Sentinal, owned by Universe Tankships was blocked by a union, the ITWF, which refused to make tugs available to help the ship into port.
  • after negotiations ITWF agreed to lift the blacking in return for an undertaking from Universe Tankships to improve crew pay, and conditions on the ship, and make a contribution to an ITWF fund.
  • The company later sought to recover their £6,480 contribution as the payment had been made under economic duress and was recoverable by restitutionary remedy because it was unconnected with a trade dispute.

Held - they were entitled to its return, since it had been paid under economic duress. The agreement was voidable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give a case law example of where ‘lawful conduct’ could amount to illegitimate pressures

A

Progress Bulk Carriers Ltd v Tube City IMS LLC (The Cenk Kaptanoglu) (2012)

  • Progress chartered its vessel to Tube for carriage of a cargo from the US to China. The charter did not give any right to substitute the vessel, but Progress fixed the vessel to another charterer without informing Tube.
  • Progress conceded that it had made a mistake and said that it would find an alternative vessel and would compensate Tube.
  • Tube accepted a substitute vessel with a discount on the freight rate but sought to reserve its rights in respect of all claims for damage arising out of breach of the charter. Progress then made a “take it or leave it” offer requiring acceptance of the vessel with the reduction of the freight rate with Tube’s agreement to waive all claims for loss and damage.

Held - from the authorities, ‘illegitimate pressure’ could be constituted by conduct which was not in itself unlawful, although it would be an unusual case where that was so, particularly in the commercial context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give case law examples that demonstrate lawful action does not give rise to duress

A

CTN and Carry Ltd v Gallagher Ltd [1994]

  • D had mistakenly sent a shipment of cigarettes to the wrong place of business for C
  • C undertook to remedy the situation but before the cigarettes could be moved, they were stolen
  • D genuinely but mistakenly believed that the cigarettes were at C’s risk and so invoiced them for the price, threatening to withdraw credit facilities if the price was not paid
  • Under the terms of the agreement, the credit facilities could lawfully be withdrawn at any time
  • Faced with no choice between the 2 evils, C opted to pay the price and subsequently reclaimed the money paid on the basis that the payment had been made under duress

Held – no duress on the facts because of three key elements:
(1) the arm’s length commercial dealings between the two trading companies
(2) the lawful nature of the threat
(3) the bona fide belief in their entitlement on the part of D

Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (2021)

  • C were travel agents, business focused on selling airline tickets to British Pakistani Community
  • D offered only direct flights between UK and Pakistan
  • D changed calculation of commission paid to travel agents and asked C to sign new agreement giving up contractual rights to commission or not be allowed to sell PIA tickets

Held
* insufficient evidence for economic duress
* threat to end contract was within contractual and legal right because renegotiating a new contract
* commercially hard bargain but no legal repurcussions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Give another case law example demonstrating no duress due to lawful/justifiable actions

A

R v Attorney General for England and Wales (2003)

  • A former member of SAS regiment was captured and tortured. Eventually released when the war was over.
  • After the war, members of another patrol published books about their account of the war. Not seen as good practice and the Ministry of Defence required the remaining members of the squadron to sign a confidentiality agreement or they would be demoted.
  • In 1997, the defendant left the army and published his memoirs about the war.

Privy Council held - no duress. The demand supported by the threat was justifiable, since the Ministry of Defence had legitimate concerns and was reasonably entitled to regard anyone unwilling to accept the obligation of confidentiality as unsuitable for the SAS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Give a case law example of duress due to Defendant having no alternative

A

Atlas v Kafco (1989)

  • Kafco, a small company importing and distributing basketware, secured a large contract to supply to
    Woolworths (prominent national chain of high-street shops)
  • Kafco entered into a delivery contract with national carrier, Atlas, to distribute the goods to Woolworths at an agreed price per carton
  • Atlas underestimated the size of the cartons, so the agreed delivery price was uneconomically low
  • After the first delivery, Atlas refused to deliver anymore cartons unless Kafco agreed to amend the contract with better terms for Atlas
  • It was essential to Kafco’s commercial survival that it could meet delivery for Woolworths and Kafco could not easily find another carrier
    ○ Atlas had pushed Kafco into a corner because they knew that it they were Kafco’s only option and did not have any other choice

Held:
These circumstances amounted to economic duress and Kafco could rescind the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What case outlined the elements of unnaceptable and acceptable commercial pressure?

A

Per Lord Scarman in Pao On v Lau Yiu Long (1980)
* Did the person protest at the time?
* Did the person have an alternative course of action open to them?
* Was the person independently advised?
Did the person take steps to avoid the contract once they entered into it?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the requirements for duress?

A
  • To rescind the contract, Claimant needs to establish:
    a) the threat or pressure by the Defendant must have been illegitimate;
    and
    b) the threat or pressure must have caused the Claimant to enter the contract (Barton v Armstrong)
21
Q

When does duress to property occur and what did it develop?

A
  • Occurs when there is a threat to seize the owner’s property or to damage it
  • developed the limited recognition of duress only being directed at a person as stated Skeate v Beale (1840)
22
Q

Give a case law example of duress to property

A

Astley v Reynolds (1731)

  • P pawned a plate to D for £20
  • Three years later D refused to allow P to redeem the plate unless £10 was paid out of interest. The interest was paid and P sought relief in courts

Held: the paumenr was not made with the freedom of excersising his will

23
Q

What are the available remedies for Duress?

A

Recission

24
Q

What is the additional bar to rescission in the case of duress? Give a case law example

Case law example actually shows some of the bars coming together

A

Does not take action to ‘protest at the time, or shortly thereafter’

North Ocean Shipping Co Ltd v Hyundai Construction Co Ltd , The Atlantic Baron [1997]

  • D had agreed to build a tanker for C at a price to be payable in five instalments in dollars
  • C paid the first instalment but then the dollar dropped by 10% and D demanded a 10% increase in the contract price stating that they would not complete the ship unless this was forthcoming
  • C agreed to pay the extra money despite the fact that they were not legally obliged to do so
  • Eventually all 4 instalments were paid increased by 10% and C took the delivery of the ship
  • 8 months later C sought to recover the extra money paid

Held - their action must fail. This was a case of economic duress, but C unable to recover because the failure to protest or reopen the issue for such a long time amounted to constructive affirmation of the contract

25
Q

What is the difference between Duress and Undue Influence?

A
  • Duress: victim submits against his or her will, due to force/threats/illegitimate pressure
  • Undue influence: victim acts in accordance with his or her will, but that will has been overborne/unduly influenced by the dominance of another party
26
Q

What did Lord Nicholls say Undue Influence was in Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (2001)

A

‘one of the grounds of relief developed by the courts of equity as a court of conscience. The objective is to ensure that the influence of one person over another is not abused.’ –> the influence arises as there is some sort of relationship before hand

27
Q

What was equity more interested in?

A

More interested in the relationship between the parties

28
Q

What was interesting about the decision in Barclays Bank v O’Brien [1993]

A

Barclays Bank v O’Brien [1993]

  • The O’Briens agreed to execute a second mortgage of their home as security for an overdraft extended by Barclays, to a company in which Mr O’Brien alone had an interest
  • Barclays instructed the branch to whom the documents were sent to ensure that both parties were aware of the nature of the documents and had taken legal advice, but this was not done
  • Mrs O’Brien signed document without reading, relying on Mr O’Brien representations, which were false
    ○ There was an abuse of a marital relationship

Held:
* House of Lords found in favour of the wife,

    • found that the husband did not excersise undue influence but as a matter of policy as a matter of policy **married women providing security for their husbands’ debts were to be treated as a specially protected class of surety **so that the transaction could be set aside as against the bank even if it had no knowledge of any undue influence or misrepresentation
      • Due to the nature of the relationship, the bank had a duty to take reasonable steps to ensure that married women understood the nature and effect of the transaction and that the consent given was true and informed
        AND
  • The wife also had a claim in equity against any third party (Barclays) who had constructive or actual notice that the transaction in question was not to the wife’s financial advantage and which carried with it a significant risk of her husband committing a wrong in law or equity –> because he had a vested interest in saving his business at all costs

This does not mean that married couples are seen as a special relationsh

29
Q

How did Lord Browne-Wilkinson divide undue influence?

A
  • Actual Undue influence
  • Presumed Undue influence
    ○ relationships where the presumption arises automatically (no need to prove undue influence)
    ○ Do need to prove improper influence
30
Q

What are the elements of Actual Undue Influence?

A
  • No special relationship exists
  • Must prove the wrongdoer actually exerted undue influence
  • The party to the transaction had capacity (e.g. mental capacity, is of age etc)
  • They influenced the other party
  • The influence was undue

Causal link exists between undue influence and making of contract: contract is the result of undue influence

31
Q

Give case law examples of Actual Undue influence

A

Allcard v Skinner (1887)

  • The Plaintiff, an unmarried woman, wanted to join the convent as a nun but had to take vows of poverty, chastity and obedience
  • While in the sisterhood, she gifted money and other property to the mother superior, Miss Skinner, without receiving any independent advice
  • When she left the sisterhood, she tried to get her money back

Held:
* Plaintiff was unduly influenced
* BUT she could not recover her money as she had waited too long
before commencing proceedings

Williams v Bayley (1866)

  • A father mortgaged his mine (the Tipton Meadow Colliery) to save his son from being prosecuted and possibly transported to Australia for forging his father’s signature at the bank
  • Bank put pressure on the father: “Young man, do you know this is transportation?“

Held (House of Lords):
* Father’s agreement had been extracted by virtue of
undue influence being exerted on him
* Agreements with Bank were invalid

32
Q

What is Presumed Undue Influence?

A

parties are in a relationship that comes within the traditional categories of presumed influence;

or

b) the relationship falls outside those categories but nature of the relationship is one of special trust and confidence

33
Q

What are some examples of categories of ‘special relationships’?

A
  • parent/child
  • guardian/ward
  • solicitor/client (this could be any professional advisor)
  • doctor or counsellor or medical carer/patient
  • religious or faith workers/members of their faith
34
Q

What relationship is not automatically treated as being one of trust and confiedence?

A

The relationship between husband and wife - they have to prove that this a relationship of special trust and confidence

35
Q

How does the onus of proof shift when undue influence is presumed?

A

The ‘stronger’ party must show that the weaker party was freed of the deemed undue influence - they were acting freely and with choice

36
Q

Give a case law example of presumed Undue influence

A

Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge (No 2) (2001)

  • Wife mortgaged her joint interest in the family home to RBS as security for debts of husband and his business
  • Wife received no direct benefit
  • Husband’s business failed and bank wanted to take possession of the
    family home
  • Wife sought to avoid the mortgage and claimed undue influence

Held: (House of Lords)

  • Although the wife did not establish grounds to avoid the security, the decision is important, as it establishes that a spouse (or anyone in a similar position, should not charge their interest in the matrimonial home to secure the borrowing of their partner (or anyone in a similar position), without fully understanding the nature and effect of the proposed transaction
  • The borrower must be able to make a fully informed decision – it is up to them to freely agree/not agree to the transaction
  • Therefore, banks are put on inquiry whenever a wife offers to guarantee her husband’s debts, where the loan is only going to be for the husband’s benefit and have a duty to ensure spouses receive independent advice
  • Per Lord Nicholls: if the banks have taken reasonable steps to ensure that the wife received independent advice, then it is fair that they rely on their rights under the contract and they cannot be responsible if the advice is defective
37
Q

How did Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) [1998] clarify the rules govering undue influence?

A
  • clarified that banks should put on inquiry whenever a wife wants to gurantee her husband’s debt when it only benefits the husband
  • Lord Nicholls stated that all the victim has to prove was that they placed their trust and confidence in the ‘stronger’ party
  • It also clarified that the victim must establish that the transaction ‘calls for explanation’
38
Q

How do you prove undue influence?

A

Actual Undue Influence
* No special relationship exists
* Must prove the wrongdoer actually exerted undue influence

Presumed Undue Influence
* Law makes a genuine presumption in relation to certain types of relationships
* Evidential presumption - burden of proof shifts from the claimant to the other party, who must prove the transaction was made without

39
Q

What is the effect of Evidential Presumption?

A
  • Complainant establishes the relationship and an inexplicable transaction
  • Burden of proof shifts to the other party to disprove the presumption

Independent legal advice is best way to rebut this presumption

40
Q

Give a case law of Evidential Presumption

A

Pesticcio v Huet (2004)

  • Pesticcio sought relief from the effects of executing a deed, gifting his
    house to his sister Maureen
  • Pesticcio had suffered from mental and physical disabilities since contracting meningitis shortly after birth and lived in the house for 40 years with his mother, until a fall caused him to be placed in a nursing home
  • Maureen took over Pesticcio’s previous role of caring for the mother at the house and began to handle Pesticcio ‘s financial affairs
  • Pesticcio executed the deed of gift and an enduring power of attorney in favour of Maureen following discussions with a solicitor who had been approached by Maureen
  • Maureen subsequently sold the house to Huet and Pesticcio claimed the contract should be set aside on the ground of undue influence
    ○ The selling of the house should not have happened if the solicitor was not working n both sides
    ○ Because the solicitor had been talking to both parties and there was no independent legal advice solely to Pesticcio and so there was a conflict of interest

Held: a presumed influence arising out from a relationship of trust (solicitor and client)and confidence should not operate to disadvantage the claimant, if the transaction is not satisfactorily explained by ordinary motives

41
Q

What are the elements for Unconscionable conduct and inequality of bargaining power that Fry v Lane created?

A
  • Is the Claimant poor and ignorant? (ie: an element of vulnerability)
  • Are the terms of the contract substantially disadvantageous to the Claimant?
    Has any independent advice been provided to the Claimant?
42
Q

What was the following element added by Alec Lobb v Total Oil [1985]?

A
  • Was there wrongful exploitation of the Claimant by the Defendant?
43
Q

What did Lord Denning say in Lloyds Bank v Bundy [1974] concerning the inequality of bargaining power?

summarised

A
  • All instances [of undue influence] rest on inequality of bargaining power
  • English law gives relief to those:
  • without independent advice
  • and entering to a contract with very unfair terms or a transfer of property for a completely inadequate consideration
  • When bargaining power is seriously impaired
  • Coupled with undue influences or pressures
44
Q

What did Lord Scarman say in National Westmisnter Bank v Morgan [1985]

summarised

A
  • questioned the need in modern law to create a general principle of relief
  • Because Parliament has already done it and is essentially a legislative task to enact such restrictions upon freedom of contract
  • Doubts whether the courts should formulate further restrictions
45
Q

Outline the statutory restrictions

A
    • Regulation 7, Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008: prohibits aggressive commercial practices by a trader against a consumer
  • Sections 62 and 63, Consumer Rights Act 2015: sets out contract terms which may or must be regarded as unfair
  • Section 11, Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977: offers protection where there is an imbalance between the parties, including by setting out a statutory test of reasonableness
  • Section 140A, Consumer Credit Act 1974: deals with unfair relationships between creditors and debtors
46
Q

What is Actual Undue Influence also known as?

A

‘Domination cases’

47
Q

What is the general rule surrounding non special/protected relationships?

A
  • Non special do not give rise to an automatic presumption of undue influence
  • but Undue influence can be establised from the proof of trust and confidence without proof of actual undue influence
48
Q

Give examples of non - special relationships

A
  • Husband and wife - Yerkey v Jones (1939)
  • Cohabitees, whether married or ma§ cohabitees, whether married or unmarried – Barclays Bank v O’Brien
  • Son and elderly parents - Avon Finance Co Ltd v Bridger [1985]
  • bank and customer - National Westminster Bank Ltd v Morgan [1985]
49
Q
A