Duties essay Flashcards

1
Q

Order to address questions

A
  1. Outline Boardman v Phipps
  2. What is a fiduciary
  3. What is their duty?
    - disclosure
    - Conflict
    - Status of info
  4. Appropriate remedies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

6 cases to remember for essay

A
The rule: 
keech v Sandford
Regal v Gulliver
The remedy:
Lister v Stubbs
AG for HK v Reid
Sinclair v Versailles
Target v Redfern
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a fiduciary: 6 points

A
  1. Henderson v Merritt - Fiduciary duties is a dangerous phrase
  2. Millett - 3 circs give rise: 1. trust & confidence, 2. Influence, 3. Confidentiality
  3. Finn - Not subject b/c but b/c of duties is F
  4. Edelman - voluntary assumption
  5. Commonwealth - F has power, can affect Bs interests, B is at mercy
  6. Was Tom P a fiduciary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a fiduciary duty - 3 sub categories

A
  1. Disclosure
  2. Conflict of interest
  3. Nature of info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fiduciary duty - disclosure; 3 points

A
  1. Name the 2 cases
  2. If rule is strict what difference does it make
  3. In BvP there was full disclosure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Fiduciary duty - conflict of interest: 2 points

A
  1. Langbein - sole interest or best interest of B
  2. BvP judgments - Cohen - there was a potential conflict; Upjohn - there has to be a realistic prospect of conflict not just theoretical
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fiduciary duty - status of information: 4 points

A
  1. Cohen - whether it came from trust strict regal v gulliver approach
  2. Upjohn - whether it’s confidential
  3. Jones - to say solely from info offends legal and common sense
  4. ALL - info is not property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Remedies: 5 points

A
  1. Jones - prophylactic - sensitivity - sledgehammer
  2. Jones - Prop remedy shoudl be for unjust enrichment only
  3. Millett - Rules should be different for commercial tradiional trusts
  4. Should Boardman have been treated differently to Phipps. Shoudl Ts and Fs be treated differently
  5. Upholds certainty but discourages good Ts - esp in light of nestle v nat west
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly