Duty of Care Flashcards
(34 cards)
Caparo v Diskman
1) Was the class of damage to the claimant reasonably foreseeable?
2) Was there a relationship of proximity between the defendant and claimant?
3) Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty?
Watson v British Boxing Board
Boxer claimed that medical attention should have been available ringside - upheld due to likelihood of injury and magnitude of potential harm
Donoghue v Stevenson
Duty of care exists between manufacturers and consumer
Nettleship v Weston
Duty of care exists between road users, pedestrians and passengers
Cassidy v Ministry of Health
All medical staff owe a duty of care to their patients
Bull v Devon HA
Hospitals owe a duty of care to each patient
Wilson and Clyde Coal v English
Employers owe a duty of care to their employees
Hall v Simons
Lawyers do not have immunity from negligence claims
Hunter v CC West Midlands
Claimants should appeal criminal convictions rather than sue the lawyer
Jones v Kaney
No immunity of expert witnesses from suit
Kent v Griffiths
Ambulance services owe a duty to patients when a call is accepted
Can be excluded for decisions to attend to more pressing emergency/policy issues
Capital Counties v Hampshire
Fire service under no duty to respond
Church of Jesus Christ and the Latter-Day Saints v West Yorkshire Fire and Civil Defence Authority
No duty owed by fire department unless actively make situation worse than had they not attended
Did not have enough water in hydrants - still no duty
Rigby v CC Northamptonshire
Distinction between policy and operational claims for police
Police officer negligently fired CS gas into claimant’s shop without checking risk of fire
Hill v CC West Yorkshire
Police do not owe a duty regarding actions of criminals, unless a member of the public is in danger above and beyond the rest of the public
Alexandrou v Oxford
Police owe no duty to respond to calls (burglar alarm)
Leach v CC Gloucestershire
Claimant left traumatised after sitting in on interrogation of criminal - no proximate relationship between her and the police
Swinney v CC Northumbria
Witness encouraged to give evidence which was stolen from police care
Duty upheld between informant and police
An Informer v A Chief Constable
Duty between police and informant for personal injury only, not PEL
Reeves v Metropolitan Police
Police found to have a duty of care to a mentally ill prisoner who committed suicide whilst in custody (high degree of control)
Costello v CC Northumbria
Claimant was attacked by prisoner while colleagues were outside - duty of care owed
Osman v Ferguson
Police only have a duty to a potential victim if they knew or ought reasonably to have known that they were at real and immediate risk over and above the rest of the public
Stovin v Wise
No duty owed by local authorities when driver was injured due to overhanging bank of earth obstructing his view
Reluctance to impose liability since taxpayers will foot the bill
Carmarthenshire CC v Lewis
Duty owed when proximate relationship established/care and control of school children which contributed to road accident