E-Commerce Act Flashcards
(33 cards)
What is the objective of E-commerce act?
- Facilitate domestic and international dealings
- Recognize the authenticity and reliability of electronic data messages or documents
- Promote the universal use of electronic transactions
System for generating, sending, receiving, storing or processing electronic documents
Information and communications system
Person by whom or on whose behalf, the electronic document purports to have been created, generated, and/or sent
Does not include intermediary
Originator
Person who is intended by the originator to receive
Addressee
Person who in behalf of another sends, receives, and/or stores, and provides other services
Intermediary
Provider of online services or network access or the operator of facilities or provider of necessary technical means
Service provider
Service provides shall
- no authority to modify or alter the content or make any entry on behalf of the originator
- retain the electronic document
Information generated, sent, received or stores by electronic, optical or similar means
Electronic data message
Distinctive mark in electronic form
Electronic signature
Information shall not be denied validity or enforceability solely in the ground that it is in the form of electronic data message
Legal recognition of electronic data message
When can an electronic signature be equivalent to the signature of a person on a written document?
- it is an electronic signature
- proved by a prescribed procedure, not alterable by interested parties
What is the prescribed procedure?
- Method is used to identify the party
- It is reliable and appropriate for the purpose
- Necessary for the party sought to be bound to provide the electronic signature
- Other party is authorized and enabled to verify the e-sig and make the decision to proceed
Presumption relating to E-sig?
- E-sig is the signature of the person to whom it correlates
- Was affixed by that person with the intention of signing or approving the electronic doc
Exemptions to presumption?
- Person relying on the electronic doc knows or has notice of defects in or unreliability of signature
- Reliance on the e-sig is not reasonable under the circumstances
When can an electronic data message be sufficient if the law requires information be presented or retained in its original form?
- The integrity of the information from when it was first generated as an electronic document is shown by evidence
- The information is capable of being displayed to the person to whom it is to be presented
Information has remained complete and unaltered apart from the additions which arises in the normal course of communication, storage and display
Criteria for assessing integrity
Shall be assessed in the light of purpose for which the information was generated
Standard of reliability
Requirement that documents be retained in their original form is satisfied by retaining them in the form of an electronic data message or document which?
- Remains accessible for subsequent reference
- Retained in the format in which it was generated, sent or received
- Identifies its originator and addressee
Electronic transactions made through networking among banks shall be deemed consummated?
Upon actual dispensing of cash or the debit of one account and the corresponding credit to another
An electronic data message is that of the originator:
- If it was sent by the originator himself
- Sent by a person who had authority to act on his behalf
- Information system programmed to operate automatically
Exceptions to GR on acknowledgement?
- Parties agree to it
- Origination requested it in the EDM/ED
An addressee is entitled to regard an electronic data message as that of the originator and act on that assumption if
- Used a procedure previously agreed to by the originator for that purpose
- Agent of the originator enabled that person to gain access to gain access to a method
The address is entitled to regard each EDM as separate except?
- It duplicates another
- Addressee knew or should have known had it exercised reasonable care
General rule of acknowledgement of receipt?
No acknowledgement necessary