Easements Flashcards
(52 cards)
What is an easement?
A proprietary right to use land which belongs to somebody else.
Can only exist between two freehold owners.
What is the dominant tenement?
The person who receives the benefit of the easement - the grantee
What is the servient tenement?
The person who grants the easement and is burdened by the easement - the grantor.
When is an easement a legal interest in land?
If it is equivalent to a freehold or a leasehold estate. If not - it can only be equitable.
What are the only recognised negative easements at law?
A right to light - in relation to a defined aperture
A right to air
A right to support (from a wall)
What are quasi easements?
Use of something (e.g. paths on your own land) that may become easements if the land were ever divided.
What is a profit a prendre?
Confers a right to take something from the land.
What is a restrictive covenant?
Restricts what can be done on the servient land.
What is a grant?
Where a landowner sells or leases part of their land to a third party, and grants the third party an easement over the land they have retained.
What is a reservation?
Where a landowner sells or leases part of their land to a third party, and reserves a right of way for themselves over the third parties land.
Which of a grant or a reservation is more strictly construed, and why?
Reservation - as the person who enjoys the benefit of the easement had the express ability to set out what they wanted to retain.
How are easements created?
- They can be made expressly
- Implied into documents.
- Or granted by prescription - ‘long use’.
When can an easement be claimed by prescription?
If exercised for over 20 years.
Prescription will succeed under the Prescription Act 1832 if the use can prove uninterrupted enjoyment for the 20 year period.
No use for over one year = interruption.
What is required for an easement to have been acquired by prescription?
- Continuous user - a ‘reasonably regular use’ by a freeholder or successive freehold owners against a freeholder.
- Who used the easement as a right - without force, without secrecy, and without permission.
What is the three step process for establishing whether something is an easement?
1) Capability - Re Ellenborough Park
2) Disqualifying factors
3) Has it been acquired?
What is the test from Re Ellenborough Park: four elements which must exist in order for something to be capable of being an easement?
There must be a dominant and servient tenement
The right must accomodate the dominant tenement (proximity)
There must be diversity of ownership
The right must lie in grant
Step 2 of Re Ellenborough Park: What must you consider to judge whether an easement accommodates the dominant tenement?
Does the right benefit any owner of the land?
Does it cease to be of use once the dominant owner has parted with the land?
Does the right make the dominant land a better or more convenient property?
Does the right add value or amenity to the dominant land?
What must you consider regarding step 2 of Re Ellenborough Park if an easement benefits a business which exists on the land?
Must consider whether the business is a necessary incident to the use of the land, or an unconnected business. If there is a connection between the land / business run from the land, a right that benefits the business will also benefit the land.
What features must an easement have to make it capable of forming the subject matter of a deed (for point 4 of Re Ellenborough Park - the right must lie in grant)?
Granted by a capable grantor to a capable grantee
Capable of reasonably exact description
Judicially recognised
Name some examples of rights which have been judicially recognised?
Right of way
Right of drainage and other rights through pipelines
Right of support
Right to use sporting and leisure facilities
Right to use land for storage / parking
Name the three disqualifying factors which will make an easement ineligible to be an easement.
Exercise of the right must not amount to exclusive possession of the servient tenement
Must not involve additional, unavoidable expenditure by the servient owner
Cannot depend upon permission being given by servient owner.
What are the two tests relevant for considering exclusive possession?
The ouster principle
The possession and control test
What is the ouster principle?
Is there any reasonable use of the land remaining? This test is binding law.
What is the possession and control test and how does it differ from the ouster principle?
Asks whether the person retained possession and control of the land - this test is much more flexible.
If you can do anything on the land except interfere with the right (here, the parking and storage), it probably won’t be disqualified.