EASEMENTS Flashcards

(36 cards)

1
Q

What is an easement?

A

The right to do something on a plot of land belonging to another
Dominant tenement over a servient tenement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Classic example of an easement

A

Right of way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two requirements of an easement?

A

1) Satisfys the 4 requirements of re ELLENBOROUGH PARK

2) Was created correctly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 4 requirements of Re ELLENBOROUGH PARK

A
  • Dom and serv tenements must be identifiable
  • Must accommodate the dom tenement
  • Diversity of ownership of the estates
  • Must be capable of being subject matter of a grant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acronym for remembering ELLENBOROUGH PARK

A

D -Dom and serv tenements indentifable
A - Accommodates dom tenement
D - Diversity of ownership
S - Subject matter of deed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case for dom and serv tenements clearly identifiable

A

LONDON AND BLENHEIM ESTATES v LADBROKE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Cases for no identifiable dominant land = no easement

A

HAWKINS v RUTTER - no easement

MOODIE v STEGGLES - easement allowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HAWKINS v RUTTER

A
  • Tried to claim an easement for his barge and the right to moor it along the canal
  • Barge not real property (land) so could not be a dominant tenement
  • No dominant tenement = no easement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case stating ST must serve DT, benefiting the land?

A

HILL V TUPPER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HILL v TUPPER

A
  • Claimed a right to run hired boats on a canal
  • When a competitor did he same, claim made that he had an easement over the canal so could exclude the competitor
  • He had a mere personal contractual right over the canal, as if it doesn’t benefit the land = no easement, no property right
  • Could only sue for breach of contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

MOODIE v STEGGLES

A
  • Sign for a pub on the main road, pub itself down a side alley
  • Landowner on main road wanted to remove the sign
  • Sign held to benefit the land (pointed to the pub) and was integral to use of land as a pub
  • DT was the pub, ST the rod where the sign was
    = easement so could not be removed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why are courts generally reluctant to grant property right?

A

They are long lasting and powerful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case for there being diversity of ownership of tenements?

A

ROE v SIDDONS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ROE v SIDDONS

A

Impossible to have an easement over your own land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why is subject matter of an easement important?

A

-> Must be capable of being subject matter of a grant, so it can be put in a lease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are certain established easements?

A

1) Clearly defined right of way (clear as to allow co-existence of rights of both tenants)
2) Drainage
3) Something capable of being a property right

17
Q

Is a view an easement?

A

NO

-> Too imprecise

18
Q

Case for right to a view not being an easement

19
Q

Re ALDREDS

A

Cannot have easement that is the right to a view, it is too imprecise

20
Q

Case that states in order to be an easement it must be capable of being a property right?

A

HUNTER v CANARY WARF

21
Q

Why can’t an easement amount to exclusive possession?

A
  • > It is only the co-existence of separate property rights

- > Exclusive possession = lease

22
Q

BATCHELOR v MARLOW

no easement

A
  • Claim of easement to use 6 parking spaces in a tiny lot, mon-fri, 8.30am-6pm
  • Having a right at specific times = exclusive possession, particularly as so extensive
  • If ST loses reasonable enjoyment of their land then cannot be an easement
23
Q

MILLER v EMCER

easement

A
  • Had right to use toilet in neighbours garden, neighbour argued = exclusive possession as they couldn’t use it while he was in it
  • Was not constantly in the toilet, only while using it = exclusive use NOT exclusive possesion
  • Both were entitled to exclusive use, balance
24
Q

WRIGHT v MACADAM

easement

A
  • In relation to storage space
  • Given permission to use coal storage area, owner argued that exclusive possession of the coal shed taken
  • There were plenty of other areas to safely store coal on the ST, so easement was allowed
  • Shows importance of considering entire area of both tenements to achieve a balance of rights
25
MONCREIF v JAMESON (Scottish case) | easement
- Also to do with storage | - Idea of a test centred on possession and control of an area, like MARLOW
26
What is meant by an easement being a negative burden?
It doesn't involve expenditure
27
Case that states easement is negative burden
REGIS PROPERTY v REDMAN
28
What was the argument in CROW v WOOD
- Possibility of allowing expenditure towards upkeep of a swimming pool so they could give an easement for it's use - Court held no, ANY expenditure = no easement
29
REGIS PROPERTY v REDMAN confirmed in CROW v WOOD
Easement's do not involve expenditure
30
Case for easement being a right, not a permission
GREEN v ASCHO
31
GREEN v ASCHO
- Gate to use right of way across ST was locked, DT had to ask for it to be opened - Having to ask for permission is not using an easement as a right, which it is
32
According to LPA 1925, how is an express easement created?
- > Giving express permission - > s52 states it must be by deed - > s1(2)(a) states it must amount to an estate in land, i.e. be for a fixed term or forever
33
s52 LPA 1925
For an express easement to be legally valid it must be made by deed
34
s1(2)(a) LPA 1925
Easements must amount to an estate in land - > Fixed term OR - > Lasts forever
35
Why has the law on valid legal easements changed since 2002?
s27 of the LAND REGISTRATION ACT 2002 - Easement must be registered in it's own right - Is separate on the register
36
Section of the LRA 2002 stating easements must be registered in their own right
s27