Eastbourne Case Study Flashcards

1
Q

Where is Eastbourne

A

East Sussex, southern England in the South Downs national park

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe population

A

Growing population of 100,000 people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe threats to Eastbourne’s sea defences

A
  • rising sea levels of 0.6-2.6m in next years
  • 95% homes built on floodplains
    = risk of flooding
  • new groynes cost up to £7000 per groyne
  • new sea walls cost up to £3000-4000 per metre
  • storms at winter caused groynes to collapse
  • seawall undermined
  • existing timber groynes are rotten, ineffective and dangerous
  • chalk cliff to west of town rapidly eroding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Opportunities of Eastbourne

A
  • £100k budget from council for defences and £1.8 million from environmental agency
  • 94 timber groynes rebuilt using tropical hard rock
    = help retain shingle added by reducing longshore drift
  • shoreline management plan for next 100 years to “hold the line”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strengths of current defences

A
  • existing sea wall of 3.6
  • existing shingle beach
    = absorb wave power
  • current groynes slow down passage of shingle along beach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did Eastbourne do

A
  • 1 million tonnes of shingle to beach
  • rebuilt 94 timber groynes made of tropical ekki
  • dumped rock armour at base of cliffs at Holywell
  • used £30 million from DEFRA from 1994-1999
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Impact of shingle lost

A

A lot of shingle lost
= risk of groynes becoming unstable in future
= must have additional shingle added
= has happened due to destructive waves and strong backwash that takes shingle and moves it along the beach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe views over strategies

A

Local residents are for the strategies
= help protect their properties
= reduces their insurance
= keep town attractive
Tourists are for the strategies
= improved sea front will increase tourists
= allow tourist companies to invest confidently
Environmentalists are against the strategies
= dredging impacts the sea bed environment
= unhappy with only hard engineering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly