ECBM Lecture 1--stats review Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

scientific method

A

prove or disprove hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

precision

A

Target: clustered in same spot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

accuracy

A

Target: hit bullseye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

necessary characteristics of research

A
Objectivity
precision 
verification
economic 
reasonable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research: Observational

A

Exploratory –> often when thing under observation would be unethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RCT

A

randomized control trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Comparitive analysis

A

research on drug A vs placibo
research on drug B vs placibo
comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Strongest evidence in clinical research?

A

Randomized control trial RCT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Observational study divisions

A

Cohort– groups with/ without exposure –>outcome

Case Control– grps exposure with/without disease–> outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

N

A

population–compare pt to population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

n

A

sample–characterized by statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

n statistics

A

draw conclusions and broadly apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

variable being manipulated (the intervention)

A

Independent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

any variable being measured (the outcome)

A

dependent variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

whole units of data Qualitative

A

discrete –

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

data with range

A

continuous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

ranked data (1st, 2nd, 3rd)

A

ordinal scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

ordered data w/out a meaningful zero (water temp)

A

interval scale–0 temp is an actual temp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

bar graph with no spaces–for trend

A

histogram

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

most frequent #

A

mode

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

value in middle

A

median

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

standard deviation

A

68% of data to either side of mean on line graph = confidence interval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

confidence interval most often used

A

95% confidence – related to P needing to be less than 0.05

24
Q

trustworthy graph

A

tall and narrow–wide curve not precise

25
when asked "what is the confidence interval?"
compare upper and lower limits--not 95%
26
empirical rule
when you have a normalized bell curve--two standard deviations from mean will give 95% confidence interval
27
null hypothesis is rejected when true
Type I error--ex. assume you have enough $ for groceries, but you don't
28
the null hypothesis is kept when it is fake
Type II error-- you assume you don't have enough $, but you don't
29
Better error to make in medicine?
Type II error--underestimate drugs efficacy
30
Regression
predict one factor from existing graph/data
31
how benefitial is drug
treatment effect
32
which numbers for 2X2 square?
think of scenario | read abstract
33
2X2 -- the scenario
always deal with PEOPLE--may need to add/subtract groups
34
2X2 -- the abstract
avoid scores--look for PEOPLE--may be in percentages
35
For 2X2-- what is the % of people who something happened to
Event Rate (EER)--incidence of some thing--may be in abstract
36
First step
calculate EER (experimental event rate) and CER (control event rate)
37
second step
compare EER and CER (risk ratio, relative risk)
38
see ratio think...
divide RR = EER/CER
39
100 minus risk ratio-- 100-X= Y
relative risk reduction RRR
40
how many people would I need to treat with drugX to save one life
number needed to treat NNT
41
NNT
100%/ARR (in %)
42
apply NNT math to negative outcomes
number needed to harm NNH
43
odds for treatment/ odds for control
odds ratio (OR) -- Odds vs risk
44
odds
"yes" column divided by "no"
45
positive test has diseas
true positive TP
46
negative test has disease
False negative FN
47
positive test doesn't have disease
False positive FP
48
negative test doesn't have disease
true negative
49
sensitivity=TP/(TP+FN) FN will impact sensitivity most--only on one side of equation
true positive rate (% positive test results in pt who have the disease
50
SnNOUT
snesitivity--"SeNsitivity means Negative rules ""it"" OUT"
51
SpPin
"Specificity means Positive rules ""it"" in"
52
SpPin
low false positivity-- | true negative/true negative + false positive
53
SnNout
low false negativity= | true positive/true positive + false negative
54
sensitivity and specificity equation key
look for the data point on only one side of equation--this factor will play in more to results
55
sensitivity and specificity combined
Likelihood Ratios
56
TPR + FNR = | TNR + FPR=
100% -- always
57
default hypothesis that A and B have no correlation i.e. drug has no effect
null hypothesis