ECHR Art. 2, 3, 5, 6 Flashcards

(18 cards)

1
Q

Why is Article 2 ECHR not an absolute right?

A

because 2(2) allows agents of the state to strip people of their right to life e.g. defending a member of public from unlawful violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For Article 2(2) ECHR, the use of force must be

A

no more than absolutely necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

As part of the state’s “negative” obligation to refrain from killing (under Article 2), the state has a duty of

A

command, control and training of military personnel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Investigative duty under Article 2

A

imposes a duty on the state to investigate all situations in which the state directly takes a life, including where jurisdiction applies overseas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Investigations under Art. 2 must be

A

public, independent and involve the full participation of the family

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How does Art.2 interact with medical patients seeking assisted suicide?

A

The courts have to apply a balance between the wishes of the person not to have to die in circumstances that may be ‘inhuman and degrading’ and the state’s obligation to do what is reasonable to preserve life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Threshold to meet ‘inhuman and degrading treatment’ for Art. 3

A

To show a breach, the conduct on the part of the state must be of a serious and unacceptable kind (R v Spinks)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is torture?

A

aggravated, deliberate and cruel form of treatment or punishment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can the UK remove an individual to a jurisdiction where they would face torture?

A

No, it would be a breach of the UK’s positive obligation as a Convention state to remove an individual to a jurisdiction where there was a ‘real risk’ he would suffer treatment contrary to the Convention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

refoulement

A

the forceable return of refugees or asylum seekers to their home country or another where they are at risk of persecution and danger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Article 5 right to liberty is not engaged unless a person is

A

deprived of their liberty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Can kettling amount to a deprivation of liberty?

A

Yes but depends on the facts - allowed where kettling is the least intrusive and most effective crowd control measure to avoid a real risk of serious injury or damage to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Do control orders engage Art 5(1)?

A

Yes, control orders amount to a deprivation of liberty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

To satisfy “prescribed by law” requirement, the law must be:

A

Adequately accessible
Formulated with sufficient precision to allow a citizen to regulate their conduct accordingly
The law does not have to be absolutely clear and precise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

someone who is arrested and detained should be brought

A

promptly before a judge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

max. period for detention after arrest

A

4 days (Brogan v UK - terrorism suspect)

17
Q

the victim of an article 5 (deprivation of liberty) breach by a state is entitled to

18
Q

threshold for inhuman and degrading treatment

A

treatment causing intense physical and mental suffering