eco of environment - mid term 2 Flashcards

1
Q

engineering approach

A

= summing up expected expenditures by firms on pollution-control mechanisms and personnel, and government expenses on regulatory activities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

opportunity cost

A

Economists focus on the ‘opportunity cost’, which refers to the value of resources if used in their next best alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pro-Productivity Effects of Regulation

A
  1. Improving the short-run efficiency of resource use, saving money for firms
  2. Encouraging firms to invest more, or invest “smarter” for the long run
    → Porter Hypothesis: regulation, enhances longrun competitiveness
    → Regulation may play a technology-forcing role.
  3. Reducing health-care costs or improving ecosystem services, which frees up capital for long-run investment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Anti-Productivity Effects of Regulation

A
  1. Direct Costs to Regulated Firms: Regulations can impose direct costs on companies, possibly reducing their investments in other areas.
  2. Higher Prices for Key Inputs: Regulations can cause an increase in the prices of essential resources like energy and waste disposal, which can further discourage investment in sectors not directly impacted by the regulation.
  3. Frustration of Entrepreneurial Activity: The “regulatory burden” and associated “red tape” of regulations might stifle business initiatives and investments.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

employment impacts of environmental protection

A
  1. no economy-wide trade-off: no trade off between environmental protection and job growth
  2. green job growth
  3. small layoffs
  4. few pollution havens: industries w heavy pollution are not fleeing to developing countries with lax regulations in large numbers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

general equilibrium (GE) effects

A

effects of regulation that are felt throughout the economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

partial equilibrium effects

A

only felt in the specific regulated sector

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

double-dividend effect

A

a pollution tax might yield two main beneficial effects on the economy
1. Internalizing the externality: ensuring that firms and consumes account for the external costs of the consumption/production
2. Beneficial use of tax revenus: if the carbon tax revenues are used to reduce payroll taxes, it could spur firms to hire more

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the safety standard

A

fairness concerns rather than efficiency
people have the fundamental right to protection from significant, unsolicited harm to their environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

gov role in safety standard

A

reduce pollution to levels causing “minimal harm”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

US Environmental protection agency (EPA) standards

A

risk below 1 in 1 million for large population “safe”
risks greater than 1 in 10 000 are “unsafe”
= in between equals informal benefic-cost analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

criticism of the safety standard

A
  1. inefficient from an economics perspective –> allocation of scarce resources
  2. not cost-effective
  3. Regressive –> greater sacrifice of other goods and services –> income equity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sustainability standard

A

focus on the long-term impacts of pollution-control standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

neoclassical sustainability

A
  1. Views natural capital as substitutable.
  2. Believes in nature’s resilience.
  3. Advocates globalization and market regulation for sustainability.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ecological sustainability

A
  1. Stresses the irreplaceability of natural capital.
  2. Views global ecosystems as fragile.
  3. Calls for government intervention to protect dwindling natural capital.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Discounting

A

determining the value of future money in today’s terms, taking into account the growth potential of money invested today

17
Q

Discounting rate

A

PDV = $X / (1+r)^T

18
Q

social discount rate

A

the value that society places on consumption today relative to consumption in the future

19
Q

Ramsey equation

A

r = δ+ η×g
- r = social discount rate
- δ = pure time preference = rate at which future utility or well-being is discounted solely because it occurs in the future
- η = elasticity of marginal utility with respect to consumption = percentage change in marginal utility resulting from a percentage change in consumption
- g = expected growth rate in per capita consumption

20
Q

precautionary principle

A

never reduce the stock of natural capital below a level that generates a sustained yield of services unless good substitutes are available for the services generated

21
Q

endangered species act (ESA)

A

US legislation mandating species preservation, regardless of cost

22
Q

national environmental policy act (NEPA)

A

requires an environmental impact statement (EIS) for significant actions affecting the environment. the EIS includes potential adverse effects, alternatives, and long-term impacts

23
Q

Malthus assumption 1798

A

Population growth would surpass food supply leading to human suffering

24
Q

ecosystem services

A

benefits humans receive from nature

25
Q

environmental impact equation

A

population * affluence * tech

26
Q

ecological footprint

A

indicates land and water requirements for a community based on consumption and waste

27
Q

human development index (HDI)

A

a measure of well-being that includes income, education, and life expectance

28
Q

Simon-Ehrlich Bet

A

this bet highlighted the contrast between optimistic and pessimistic views of resource usage and its impact. Julian Simon believed human innovation would lead to the abundance of resources, while Paul Ehrlich predicted scarcity due to increasing demand. Simon won the bet

29
Q

four type of ecosystem services

A
  • provision services: products from ecosystems (both renewable and non-renewable)
  • regulating services: benefits from ecological processes controlling ecosystem flows
  • supporting services: infrastructure that keeps everything functioning
  • cultural services: nonmaterial benefits from nature, eg recreation, spiritual inspiration
30
Q

hotelling model

A

a rise in price of nonrenewable resources as quantity reduces

31
Q

profit-based conservation

A

keeping resources in the ground can be profitable if the price of the resource rises over time

32
Q

hotelling’s rule

A

a formula predicting that the percentage rise in the resource price should equal the interest rate