econ final exam Flashcards
(215 cards)
Search activity defintion
time spent looking for someone with whom to do business/ Price checking to get the best deal/ weighing cost vs benefit
Trend of search activity
housing shortage -> increase in search activity -> 1st come - 1st serve situation
formula of search activity
opportunity cost of a good= price and value of search time
price ceiling/ price cap definition
a government regulation that makes it illegal to charge a price higher than a specified level
effects of price ceiling/ price cap
effects depend on whether the ceiling is above/ below the equilibrium price
- PC> P* has no effect because PC doesn’t constraint the market forces. force of law and market force are not in conflict
- PC <P* has critical effect because PC attempts to prevent the P from regulating QD and QS. force of law and market P are in conflicts
how do you call PC when it’s applied to a housing market
rent ceiling
effects when RC < P*
- housing shortage
- increase search activity
- an illicit market
how does RC < P* cause housing shortage and increase search activity?
RC< P* -> QD> QS -> shortage -> limited QS allocation -> increase search activity
how does RC < P* create an illicit market
- RC encourages illegal trading in an illicit market
- Illicit market occurs in rent controlled housing and many other markets when RC is applied, frustrated renters and landlords constantly seek ways to increase rent which causes:
1. high P of worthless fitting (drape)
2. high P for new locks and keys (key money) - level of IM rent depends on how tightly the RC is enforced:
1. loose enforcement -> IM P is close to the unregulated rent.
2. strict enforcement -> IM P = max P that a renter is willing to pay.
inefficiency of RC
- RC < RP* -> underprod of housing services
- Marginal social benefit > marginal social cost -> DWL
- decrease in consumer and producer surplus
are RC fair?
- Fair rule view -> anything that blocks voluntary exchange is unfair -> RC is unfair
- Fair result view -> a fair outcome is the one that benefit the less well off (fairest outcome is the one that allocates scare housing to the poorest
- blocking rent adjustment doesn’t eliminate scarcity. It decreases QS of housing -> bigger challenge for the market to ration a smaller QS and allocate it according to D.
- when rent is not permitted to allocate scarce housing, other available mechanisms are:
1. lottery
2. 1st come - 1 served
3. discrimination: allocate based on the housing owner’s view and interest (ie: friendship, family, race, ethnicity, sex)
A labour market with min wage:
- trend? (cause and effect between wage and Q of labour)
- who decides what?
- define P floor
- Trend/ effects of PF when it’s in comparison with P*
- how do you call PF when it’s applied to labour market?
- how does min wage rate cause unemployment
- what happens when QS = QD of labour?
- firms decide QD of labour. Trend: dec wage -> increase QD
- household decide QS of labour. Trend: inc wage -> inc QS
- when wage rates are low OR fail to keep up with the increasing P -> labour unions turn to gov and lobby for higher wage rate
- P floor: gov regulation that make it illegal to charge a P < a specified level
+) P floor < P* has no effect -> PF doesn’t constraint the market force. Force of the law and the market force are not in conflict.
+) P floor > P* has powerful effect. PF attempts to prevent P from regulating QD and QS. Force of law and market force are in conflict.
+) PF is applied to labour market -> min wage
+) min wage > P* -> QS > QD -> surplus -> unemployment - At P* QS= QD of labour -> no shortage or surplus
is the min wage fair?
Unfair from both views
- unfair result because
+) only benefit people who have jobs
+) unemployed end up worse off than they would be with no min wage. Refer back to how min wage > P* leads to QS> QD -> unemployment
+) increase cost of job search
+) those who do job search and find one aren’t always the least well off
+) other unfair mechanism: discimmination
- unfair rule because:
+) block voluntary exchange. Firms are willing to hire and workers are willing to work. but they are not permitted due to min wage law
inefficiency of min wage
what is being considered efficient market? and what are the contributing factors?
Define SC in labour market
Define DC in labour market
how does an unregulated market achieve efficiency?
problems with min wage.
what is being considered efficient market? and what are the contributing factors?
- SC: workers marginal social cost of supplying labour = worker’s leisure foregone
- DC: firm’s marginal social benefit of using labour = value of G&S produced
- an unregulated market allocates the economy’s scare labour resource to jobs in which they value the most -> achieve efficiency
why min wage is inefficient?
- min wage frustrates market mechanism and results in unemployment and increase job search. At the Q of labour employed, firms ‘ marginal social benefit of using labour> workers’ marginal social cost of supplying labour. DWL shrinks the firm’s and the workers’ surplus
what kind of tax is applied to each category?
- earnings
- sales
- employers
- specific producers
- earnings: I taxes and social security taxes
- sales: GST and HST
- employers- social security taxes (ie: employment insurance tax for their workers)
- tax on specific producers (ie: tobacco, alcohol, gasoline)
Trend of what P do buyers or sellers respond to?
- buyers respond to the P that include tax
- sellers respond to the P that excludes tax
- Define tax incidence
- Trends of how P paid by buyers share or not share the burden of tax between buyers and sellers?
- How either tax on buyers or sellers lead to the same outcome? How does tax on buyers or sellers affect DC or SC?
- Why after tax, Q* is no longer at the intersection of DC and SC? Where is the new Q*?
- the division of the burden a tax between buyers and sellers
- when the gov imposes a tax on the sale of G&S and factors of prod - land, labour , capital, P paid by buyers might inc by the full amount of tax or less or not at all:
1. P paid by buyers inc by the full amount of tax -> burden of tax falls entirely on buyers -> buyers pay the tax
2. P paid by buyers inc lesser than the full amount of tax-> burden of tax falls partly on both buyers and sellers
3. P paid by buyers doesn’t change -> burden of tax falls entirely on sellers - tax incidence doesn’t depend on tax law. the law might impose a tax on sellers/buyers but the outcome is the same in either case:
1. tax on sellers -> dec in S. to determine the position of new SC, add tax to the min P sellers are willing to accept for sale of each Q
2. tax on buyers -> dec P they’re willing to pay -> dec D + shifts DC leftward. to determine the position of this new DC, subtract the tax from the max P that buyers are willing to pay for each Q.
Conclusion: tax is a wedge driven between P buyers pay and P sellers get. With tax, Q* is no longer at the intersection of DC and SC but at the Q where vertical gap between the curve = size of tax
taxes and efficiency
- why does tax lead to underprod?
- how does tax affects MSB and MSC and causes DWL?
- what factor does the burden of tax between buyers/sellers depend on?
- tax as a wedge -> inefficient undeprod
- P buyers pay = buyers’ willingness to pay = MSB
- P sellers receive = sellers min S-P = MSC
- tax leads to MSB > MSC -> dec producer and consumer surplus -> DWL
- division of the burden of tax between buyers/sellers depend on PE of D and S
tax incidence and E of D
- 2 cases
- who pay when
- what happens to Q* and effect of it?
- overall trend
focus on 2 extreme cases:
- Perfectly inelastic D = buyers pay
+) buyers’ QD stays the same regardless of P -> Q* doesn’t change -> no underprod OR no DWL
- perfectly elastic D = sellers pay
+) Q* dec -> underprod + DWL. DWL arises when D is not perfectly inelastic and is largest when D is perfectly elastic.
=> overall trend: the more inelastic D is -> the more tax for the buyers
tax incidence and E of S
- 2 cases
- who pay when
- what happens to P sellers accept to sell and P buyers accept to purchase? QD and QS? Q*?
- overall trend
focus on 2 extreme cases:
- perfectly inelastic -> sellers pay
+) P sellers accept to sell and buyers accept to purchase remain the same. QD and QS also stay the same -> buyers are willing to pay for all the tax.
+) Q* stays constant -> no underprod and no DWL
- perfectly elastic -> buyers pay
+) inc tax -> P sellers receive remain the same but P buyers pay inc by the full amount of tax.
+) Q* dec -> underprod + DWL (arise from a tax when S is not perfectly inelastic and is largest when S is perfectly elastic.
=> overall trend: the more elastic S is -> the more tax paid by buyers
tax and fairness
Political view:
- NDP wants higher tax on the riches to pay for public services and hand out for the poor
- Conservative wants lower tax for the riches as they already pay for the majority of it.
=> 2 conflicting principles of fairness that apply for tax system:
+) benefit principle
-> proposition that people should pay taxes = benefits they receive from the services provided by the gov
-> fair because people who pay most will benefit most -> make tax payment and consumption of gov - provided services similar to private consumption and expenditure.
-> justify:
1. high fuel taxes to pay for highways
2. high taxes on alcoholic beverages and tobacco products to pay for public health care services
3. high income taxes on high I earners to pay for the benefits from law and order and from living in a secure environ, from which the rich might benefit more than the poor.
+) ability to pay principle
-> the proposition that people should pay taxes according to how easily they can bear the burden of the tax.
-> it’s easier for the riches to bear the burden of the tax than the poors.
-> reinforce benefit principle to justify high income tax on high income earners
=> big trade off:
-> conflict between efficiency
Define subsidy
A payment made by the gov to the producers
How effects of subsidy and tax are in comparison to each other?
They go opposite directions
Effects of subsidy
- An inc in S -> shift SC rightward
- A dec in P and inc in Q produced
- An inc in marginal cost
- Payments by gov to farmers
- Inc Q* -> At new Q*, MSC (SC) > MSB (DC) -> Inefficient overprod
- inc the P that sellers receive