Economic Development Differences Flashcards
Economic Development - topic
Differences among nations
Attractiveness for doing business
Trends that foster greater economic development
Democratic forms of government
Market-based economic reforms
Legal systems to better enforce property rights
GNI
Gross National Income (GNI) is the total amount of money earned by a nation’s people and businesses. It is used to measure and track a nation’s wealth from year to year. The number includes the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP) plus the income it receives from overseas sources.
Japan, Sweden, Switzerland, and U.S. have high GNI
China and India have low GNI
GNI does not consider differences in the cost of living
Need to adjust GNI figures using purchasing power parity (PPP)
These are per capita Gross National Income (GNI) and Net National Income (NNI). Whereas GDP refers to the income generated by production activities on the economic territory of the country, GNI measures the income generated by the residents of a country, whether earned in the domestic territory or abroad.
The “official” figures can be misleading
Do not account for black economy transactions
GNI and PPP data are static and do not consider economic growth rates
China and India are currently relatively poor, but their economies are growing more rapidly than many advanced nations
China may become the world’s largest economy during the next decade
India will become among the largest economies in the world
To complicate matters, in many countries the “official” figures do not tell the entire story. Large amounts of economic activity may be in the form of unrecorded cash transactions or barter agreements. People engage in such transactions to avoid paying taxes, and although the share of total economic activity accounted for by such transactions may be small in developed economies such as the United States, in some countries (India being an example), they are reportedly very significant.
Black economy/shadow economy (e.g. in India around 50%)
Broader Conceptions of Development: Amartya Sen
Economic development should be assessed by the capabilities and opportunities people enjoy
Development requires the removal of major impediments to freedom: poverty, tyranny, poor economic opportunities
Economic progress requires the democratization of political communities to give citizens a voice
Broader Conceptions of Development: Amartya Sen continued
The United Nations used Sen’s ideas to develop the Human Development Index (HDI) which is based on
Life expectancy at birth
Educational attainment
Whether average incomes are sufficient to meet the basic needs of life in a country
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Are the Engines of Growth
Innovation
Includes new products, new processes, new organizations, new management practices, and new strategies
Entrepreneurs
First to commercialize innovative products and processes
Provides much of the dynamism in an economy
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Require a Market Economy
Little incentive to develop new innovations in planned economies because the state owns all means of production and therefore, the gains
Strong relationship between economic freedom and economic growth
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Require Strong Property Rights
Without strong property rights, individuals and businesses risk having innovations and potential profits stolen
Economist Hernando de Soto claims that inadequate property protection in many developing nations limits economic growth
The Required Political System
Democratic regimes are probably more conducive to long-term economic growth
Property rights are only secure in well-functioning, mature democracies
Totalitarian states are detrimental to progress
They limit freedom
They suppress human development
Economic Progress Begets Democracy
Economic growth leads to establishment of democratic regimes
South Korea
Taiwan
If China adopts a free market system, belief is that the country will have
Greater individual freedoms
Democracy
Geography, Education, and Economic Development
Economist Jeffrey Sachs argues that countries with favorable geography are
More likely to engage in trade
More open to market-based systems
Countries that invest in education have higher growth rates because the workforce is more productive
Countries in Southeast Asia have offset their geographical disadvantage by investing in education
Political economy of nation-states is marked by two trends
1.Democratic revolutions of the late 1980s and early 1990s
Totalitarian governments fell
Replaced by democratically elected governments
Greater commitment to free market capitalism
2.A move away from centrally planned and mixed economies toward a more free market approach
The Spread of Democracy
Many totalitarian regimes failed to deliver economic progress to the bulk of their populations
New information and communication technologies
1.Reduced state’s ability to control access to uncensored information
2.Created new conduits for the spread of democratic ideals
Economic advances have led to a prosperous middle class that has pushed for democratic reforms
HOWEVER It is naïve to conclude that the spread of democracy will continue unchallenged
Democracy is still rare in parts of the world
Sub-Saharan Africa
Former communist Eastern and central Europe and former USSR
Middle East and North Africa
Signs that authoritarianism is gaining ground
Russia, Ukraine, Indonesia, Ecuador, and Venezuela
Egypt
The New World Order and Global Terrorism
Author Francis Fukuyama argues the new world order will be characterized by democratic regimes and free market capitalism
Political scientist Samuel Huntington argues that while many societies are modernizing, they are not becoming more Western
Predicts a world split into different civilizations that will be in conflict making business difficult
Political position is more likely to be somewhere between Fukuyama and Huntington
Global terrorism is a product of tensions between civilizations and a clash of value systems and ideology
Al-Qaeda and ISIS
Struggle between radicalized Sunni and Shia factions within Islam
Former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell maintains that terrorism is one of the major threats to world peace and economic progress
The Spread of Market-Based Systems
A shift from centrally planned economies to market-based economies
More than 30 countries in the former Soviet Union and eastern European communist bloc
Change also occurring in Asian and African states
Command and mixed economies failed to deliver the sustained economic growth achieved in market-based countries
The shift toward a market-based system involves
Deregulation
Privatization
A legal system to safeguard property rights
Deregulation
Deregulation in command economies
Removing price controls
Abolishing laws regulating the establishment and operation of private enterprise
Relaxing or removing restrictions on direct investment by foreign enterprises
Deregulation in mixed economies involved the same initiatives as in command economies
Transition was easier due to a vibrant private sector
Privatization
A way to stimulate economic efficiency
Started in Great Britain in early 1980s
In many nations economic activity is still in the hands of state-owned enterprises
Selling state-owned enterprises not enough to guarantee economic growth
For privatization to work it must be paired with a general deregulation and opening of the economy
Legal Systems
A well-functioning market economy requires laws
Need to protect property rights
Mechanisms for contract enforcement
Adoption of a legal system requires time to function well
Institutional weaknesses undermine contract enforcement in most countries
Progress being made regarding laws on property rights
Ideological conflict between collectivism and individualism is less prevalent today
Western ideology more widespread
Markets formerly off-limits to Western business are now open presenting a huge potential for business
Potential risks are large
Will democracy thrive during difficult times?
Will totalitarian regimes return?
Is the risk associated with investment worth it?
Is China’s financial system stable?
Countries are more likely to have higher sustained rates of economic growth when they have
Democratic regimes
Market based economic policies
Strong property rights protection
These markets are more attractive to international businesses
benefits and costs picture
slide 33
questions in each category about doing business in a foreign country
The costs of doing business in a country based on
Political system: is it necessary to pay bribes to get market access?
Economic level: are the necessary supporting business and infrastructure in place?
Legal system: how do local laws and regulations affect business decisions? Are there well-established contract laws?
benefits & costs overall
Overall attractiveness of a potential market to international business
Depends on balancing the benefits, costs, and risks associated with doing business in that country
Other things being equal, the benefit-cost-risk trade-off is likely to be most favorable in politically stable developed and developing nations that have free market systems and no dramatic upsurge in either inflation rates or private sector debt
risks
Legal risks - Thus, a legal risk can be defined as the likelihood that a trading partner will opportunistically break a contract or expropriate property rights. When legal risks in a country are high, an international business might hesitate entering into a long-term contract or joint-venture agreement with a firm in that country.
Economic risks - An economic risk can be defined as the likelihood that economic mismanagement will cause drastic changes in a country’s business environment that hurt the profit and other goals of a particular business enterprise. Economic risks are not independent of political risk. Economic mismanagement may give rise to significant social unrest and, hence, political risk. Nevertheless, economic risks are worth emphasizing as a separate category because there is not always a one-to-one relationship between economic mismanagement and social unrest
Political risks - Political risk has been defined as the likelihood that political forces will cause drastic changes in a country’s business environment that adversely affect the profit and other goals of a business enterprise.38 So defined, political risk tends to be greater in countries experiencing social unrest and disorder or in countries where the underlying nature of a society increases the likelihood of social unrest. Social unrest typically finds expression in strikes, demonstrations, terrorism, and violent conflict. Such unrest is more likely to be found in countries that contain more than one ethnic nationality, in countries where competing ideologies are battling for political control, in countries where economic mismanagement has created high inflation and falling living standards, or in countries that straddle the “fault lines” between civilizations