economic dures Flashcards
(16 cards)
Define economic duress?
a legal doctrine where one party uses illegitimate economic pressure to force another party to enter into a contract or modify an existing contract
What is economic duress?
- a threat to damage a business or a person financially
- the court will consider each case involving econmic duress according to its individual circumstances
What must there be originally?
- a lack of practical choice for the victim
- the pressure might be illegitimate
- the illegitimate pressure is a significant cause of making the contract
Atlas Express v Kafco
threatening to breach an existing contract can constitute economic duress, particularly when the victim has no practical alternative
For economic duress there must be pressure that:
- takes away the victim choice
- is illegitimate
- is a significant cause for inducing the victim to enter into the contract
Universe Tankships Case - House of Lords
The party seeking to claim duress must have protested at the time and must not hesitate to seek to seek legal advice
However, Lord Scarman emphasised that the presence of a protest at the time of payment was strong evidence of coercion
What is illegitimate pressure?
- the pressure must go beyond legitimate commercial bargaining
- must involve threats that are unlawful
- examples include threats to breach existing contracts, unlawful actions or exploitation of vulnerability
Pao On v Lau
Opportunity to seek advice and consider options weighs against finding duress
CTN Cash & Carry v Gallagher
POL
No economic duress found as Gallaher genuinely believed CTN was liable, and the threat to stop supply was commercially acceptable.
D&C Builders v Rees
Taking advantage of another’s financial vulnerability can constitute as economic duress
Bulk Carriers v Tube City
commercial pressure must be illegitimate not merely difficult or disadvantageous
Times Travel v Pakistan International Airlines
“lawful act duress” requires exceptional circumstances beyond hard bargaining
What must the pressure be?
a significant cause of the contract or variation
Explain no practical alternative
- the victim must have had no reasonable alternative course of action
- no adequate legal remedy was readily available
- time constraints prevented seeking alternative
Explain protest or objection
- courts often look for evidence that the victim protested
- objection strengthens the claim
- prompt action to challenge the contract after pressure ends
explain no affirmation
- the victim must not have affirmed the contract after the pressure ended
- taking benefits under the contract can constitute affirmation
- delay in challenging the contract may be seen as affirmation