Education: Educational policy Flashcards
(41 cards)
What is educational policy?
How the government control education:
-increase standards.
-aim to provide equal opportunities.
-give parents more selection and choice.
Difference between W/C & M/C education
Schooling made compulsory from ages of 5-13 in 1880.
-M/C given academic curriculum to prepare them for careers in the professions or office work.
-W/C given schooling for basic numeracy & literacy skills needed to routine factory work.
Selection: Triparite system (1944)
Education influenced by meritocracy thatcher than ascribed status.
-1944 education act introduced system where children were allocated to 1 of 3 different types of secondary school, according to their aptitudes and abilities.
-These were identified by the 11+ exam.
-Grammar schools offered an academic curriculum leading to higher education (for passing 11+ & mainly M/C).
-Secondary modern schools offered practical curriculum & access to manual work (failing 11+ & mainly W/C).
Evaluation of Tripartite system
-Reproduced class inequality by channeling the 2 classes into different schools offering unequal opportunities.
Also required girls to get higher marks than boys to obtain a place.
-Legitimised inequality through ideology that ability is inborn arguing that ability can be measured early on in life through 11+.
The comprehensive school system (1965)
Introduced from 1965 onwards.
-Aimed to make education more meritocratic and get rid of the class divide.
-11+ was abolished along with grammars & secondary moderns replaced with these who all kids in the area would attend.
-Left to local education authority to ‘go comprehensive’ and not all did so so the divide remained in many areas.
Functionalist theory of the role of comprehensives (EVAL)
-Fulfilling functions such as social intergration & meritocratic selection for
future work roles.
-Social intergration by combining the classes into one school but Ford (1969) found little social mixing between W/C & M/C because of streaming.
-Meritocratic because gives pupils longer period to develop and show abilities, rather than doing this at the age of 11.
Marxist theories of the role of comprehensives (EVAL)
Marxists see education as serving capitalism by reproducing & legitimising class inequality.
-Reproduces class inequality from one generation to another by continuing streaming and labelling, denying W/C of equal opportunity.
-‘Myth of meritocracy’ justifying inequality by making unequal achievement seem fair and just like it’s the individual’s fault rather than the system.
Marketisation
Refers to process of introducing market forces of consumer choice & competition begween supplies into areas run by the state such as education.
Created education market by;
-reducing direct state control over education.
-increasing both competition between schools & parental choice of school.
Marketisation since the 1988 Education Reform act (ERA) - Thatcher
-Became the central theme since the Conservative govt.
-From 1997, New Labour govt followed similar policies emphasising standards, diversity & choice.
-From 2010, Conservative-Lib Dems took this further by creating academies and free schools.
-Neoliberals & the NR favour this since schools have to attract customers by competing with each other in the market.
-Schools providing customers with what they want (success) will thrive and those who don’t, will go out of business.
Policies to improve marketisation (Conservatives)
-National curriculum
-National testing (intro of SATS & GCSEs)
-League tables (ranking achievement in SATS & GCSEs)
-Open enrolment (parents can send kids to school outside of catchment area)
-Formula funding (funding depending on no. of kids enrolling and school is given money per student)
-Ofsted
Impact of Conservatives policies on marketisation - GOOD
-Parentocracy where there is more parent power and consumer choice (shift in control).
-Standardisation & raising standards as the national curriculum established a common standard against whcih a school could be judged.
Impact of Conservatives policies on marketisation - BAD
-Myth of parentocracy and how these changes benefitted M/C patents who used their economic & cultural capital. Ball
-A-C economy - grafes become the main focus at the expense of other aspects of school life and care.
-Not all parents have choice & freedom e.g. W/C parents live in deprived areas with unfounded schools.
e.g. ethnic minorities have language barriers.
Policies to improve marketisation (Con-Lib Dem coalition)
Allowed existing schools deemed successful by Ofsted to convert to an academy.
2 advantages:
1. Money - schools controls budget as money comes directly from govt and they can choose how to spend it so tailor school to needs of parents.
2. Freedom & Autonomy - school is free to make decisions about curriculum, admissions & how much they choose to pay staff.
Free schools are the new schools which adds more diversity and choice.
To be successful a free school needs to address a demand in market (faith based/focus on subject).
Impact of coalition policies - GOOD
-Parentocracy - more consumer choice and parents can choose schools meeting their personal wishes or kids talents - Miriam David
-Improving standards- some academies were previously failing schools taken over by a larger academy group and these new sponsors have expertise and money to revitalise the school facilities.
Impact of coalition policies - BAD
-Getting rich off education- since academy chains can pool funding and pay staff what they want, there are some heads who earn at least TWICE the standard headteacher which is hypocritical since academies were set up to help the poorest in society.
-Some say this is a misuse of taxpayers money.
The reproduction of inequality (Ball & Whitty)
Say that exam league tables and funding formula reproduce class inequalities by creating inequalities between schools.
Reproduction of inequality: League tables & Cream-skimming (Bartlett 1993)
Publishing schools exam resukts ensures schools that acheuve good ones are more in demand due to good ranking.
This encourages:
-Cream skimming where good schools can be more selective & recruit high achieving mainly M/C pupils.
-Silt shifting where good schools can avoid taking less able pupils who are likely to get poor results and damage schools position.
Reproduction of inequality: The funding formula
-Popular schools get more funds and can afford better qualified teachers and facilities & their popularity allows them to be more selective and attract more ambitious/able M/C pupils.
-Unpopular schools lose income and find it difficult to match teacher skills of rivals so they fail to attract pupils and their funding is reduced.
-Study by Institute for Public Policy research found that competition oriented education systems produce more segregation between children of different social backgrounds.
Gerwitz: parental choice
Benefits M/C parents whose economic and cultural capital puts them in a better place to choose good schools for their children.
Shown by Gerwitz’ study of 14 London schools & found that parents economic and cultural capital led to class differences in how far they can exercise choice of secondary school.
Gerwitz study: Privileged skilled choosers
Mainly professional M/C who used capital to gain educational capital for their children.
Confident and understood how school admission systems work such as putting a school as first choice, and researching options.
Also had economic capital and could afford to move children around system such as paying extra travel costs for their children to attend a better school.
Gerwitz’ study: Disconnected local choosers
W/C parents whose choices are restricted by lack of capital.
Found it harder to understand school admissions procedures and were less confident in dealing with schools and less aware of choice available and less able to manipulate system to their advantage.
Many attached importance to safety and quality of school facilities rather than long term ambitions.
Distance and cost was a major restriction due to limited funds and they often chose the nearest school.
Gerwitz’ study: Semi-skilled choosers
Mainly W/C but we’re ambitious for their kids but also lacked cultural capital and found it difficult to make sense of the education market often relying on opinions about schools.
Often frustrated with inability to get children into schools they wanted.
New Labour & Inequality
-Designating some deprived areas as Education Action Zones & providing them with additional resources.
-The Aim Higher programme to raise aspirations of underrepresented groups.
-Education Maintenance allowances: payments to students from low income backgrounds to encourage them to stay in after 16 eduction.
-Introduction of National Literacy Strategy, literacy & numeracy hours & reducing primary school class sizes.
-City academies created to give a fresh start to struggling schools with majority W/C pupils.
-Increased funding for state education.
Critics of New Labour policies
-Benn 2012 sees Labours pokies as a contradiction to tackle inequality and committment to marketisation - New Labour paradox.
-Despite introducing EMAs to encourage saying in education, Labour also introduced tuition fees that may deter students from University.
-New Labour neither abolished fee paying schools nor removed their charitable status.