Education - Policies Flashcards

(73 cards)

1
Q

What was the 1944 Education Act?

A

Established the tripartite system (grammar, technical, secondary modern)
The 11+ dictated which school you’d go to and was based on the belief that the level and abilities the child had was ‘fixed’ at birth and based on inheritance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was a technical school?

A

They generally prepared children to be a lower middle/skilled manual working class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the statistic for who got to go to grammar school

A

15-20%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What were the criticisms of the tripartite system?

A

11+ was unfairly disadvantaging children from working class homes
The self-esteem of children was damaged if they failed and were sent to second rate schools
Research in the 50s and 60s suggested talent, ability and potential of many children in secondary modern were being wasted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When was the tripartite system abolished?

A

1968

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What schools replaced the tripartite system?

A

Comprehensive schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many children in 2005 attended a comprehensive school?

A

Nine out of ten

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How many grammar schools remained in 2005?

A

164

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the different types of comprehensive schools?

A

‘True’ comprehensive schools have mixed ability classes

Most comprehensive schools do have selection by ability because of streaming

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are secondary ‘specialist’ schools?

A

Schools could specialise in max 2 subjects
They were allowed to select up to 10% of students by ability
They would also get extra funding
This was abolished in 2011

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why are they questioning whether to return to selection?

A

Political leaders have a grammar school background
‘League tables’ and judging schools and colleges on results
There is a return to streaming in schools (‘tripartite under the same roof’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the Butler Education Act (1944)?

A

It introduced free secondary education up to age 15 years for all nd resulted in the tripartite system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How was the Butler Education Act (1944) meant to be meritocratic?

A

All children took an 11+ at age 11 that was meant to allocate them to the school that suited them best

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How did the Butler Education Act fail at being meritocratic?

A
Few technical schools were built
The 11+ IQ test was not culture-fair and middle class students, with more cultural capital, dominated grammar schools
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are EPAs?

A

Educational priority areas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What inspired EPAs being formed?

A

Many cultural and material deprivation theories inspired it (e.g. Douglas (1964) poorer parents were less likely than middle class parents to take an interest in the education of their children)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What were the aims of EPAs?

A

Compensate for poverty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Why were EPAs abandoned?

A

‘Schools cannot compensate for society’ Bernstein

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the benefits of comprehensive schools?

A

Mixed ability teaching means more intelligent pupils can help boost lower ability students
Late developers are catered for better in comprehensive systems
Children are less likely to branded as a failures at an early age
Teaches wider range of subjects
Fewer social divisions
More students leave with better qualifications
Opportunities remain open throughout a child’s school career

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are the negatives of comprehensive schools?

A

Brighter students are held back by a slower pace of learning
Brighter students are better ‘stretched’ by streaming and selections
Comprehensives are so big talents can be overlooked and there can be discipline problems
While grammar schools still exist, they take the most able students, so comprehensives are more similar to secondary moderns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is pupil premium?

A

Extra funding to schools to improve educational outcomes of disadvantaged students which they can spend on general teaching, targeted support for disadvantaged pupils and for breakfast clubs and trips

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When was pupil premium introduced and by which government?

A

2011

Conservative — Liberal Democrat Coalition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What are the criticisms of pupil premium?

A

Spent to plug gaps in general school funding (not reaching disadvantaged kids)
Lack of school funding is the problem and pupil premium doesn’t make up the difference
Money spent onLearning Assistants aren’t the best way to help disadvantaged kids
Schools aren’t specific about what they spend it on (lack of accountability)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

When was Sure Start introduced and by which government?

A

1998

Labour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
What is Sure Start?
A centre to help with childcare, parenting, early education, health and family support
26
What are the criticisms of Sure Start?
An evaluation of 150 Sure Start areas with over 7,000 families found that they did little to help child development
27
What are the positives of Sure Start?
Valued and helpful to parents | Lower levels of childhood obesity
28
What is Educational Maintenance Allowance?
Student funding for 16-19 years olds going onto higher education
29
Who and when was EMA introduced?
Labour | 1999
30
What are the criticisms of EMA?
Costs too much money | Not many children claiming it go to do A Levels
31
What were Education Action Zones?
Schools, parents, businesses and community groups in disadvantaged areas brought together to attract sponsorship to help students
32
Who and when were Education Action Zones introduced?
Labour | 1998
33
What are the criticisms of Education Action Zones?
Continued the marketisation of schools trend | Was a failure and didn’t attract much sponsorship
34
When was the Education Action Zones project dropped?
2003
35
What are the policies to help girls attainment?
GIST (Girls into Science and Technology) | WISE (Women in Science and Engineering)
36
What is GIST and when was it introduced?
A programme including visits by professionals in the field, posters, career advice, etc. aimed at getting women into science Early 1980s by conservative government
37
What are the criticisms of GIST?
Positive gender stereotyping Didn’t target primary socialisation Didn’t make much difference
38
What is the only difference between WISE and GIST?
It is aimed at getting women into science and engineering, not just girls
39
When and by which government was coursework reduced?
Between 2013 and 2017 | Conservative govvernment
40
Why was coursework reduced?
Help boys achieve higher grades
41
What are the criticisms of coursework reduction?
Coursework generates less anxiety Disadvantages girls Exams you can only express knowledge through writing
42
When and by who were changes to the curriculum for english made?
2010 onwards | Conservative
43
Why was the English curriculum changed?
Help boys attach to the curriculum and therefore achieve better
44
What are the criticisms of changing the English curriculum?
Disadvantage or off-put girls from taking these subjects
45
What’s the political background to marketisation of schools?
Margaret Thatcher’s conservative government went with a new right/neo-liberal thinking for schools
46
Why were schools marketisated?
Raise standards of education by making schools compete Increase parental choice Greater government control over what’s taught in schools Reduce the influence of Local Education Authorities (LEAs) Introduce more vocational education
47
What was the 1988 Education Reform Act?
Introduced a National Curriculum National Assessments School’s could ‘opt out’ of LEA and become Grant Maintained Schools Open enrolment (parents could choose where their child went) Formula funding (funding depends on number of pupils) Vocational education initiatives
48
Why was the introduction of a national curriculum important?
Could compare students and schools results Pupils who moved schools wouldn’t be disadvantaged LEAs lost power
49
How were LEAs weakened?
Schools could ‘opt out’ of their control Local Management of Schools (LMS) meant schools had greater control of their budget, previously held by LEAs Reduced proportion of school governors appointed to LEAs Setting up Training and Enterprise Councils (TECs) which compete with local authorities in providing training and business links
50
1992 Education Act?
Further Education Colleges made independent of LEAs School Curriculum and Assessment Authority established to oversee examination system Government can take over running of failing schools League tables established OFSTED reports Expansion of higher education and reduction of student grants Schools allowed to specialise
51
Which policies tried to increase competition between schools?
Open enrolment National testing ‘League tables’ The creation of different types of schools
52
How did they increase parental choice in education?
Creation of new schools ‘Open enrolment’ The decision to ‘opt out’ of LEA control was given to parents of pupils at the school National testing and ‘league tables’ so parents know how good it is
53
Criticisms of national testing?
Doesn’t take into account socio-economic characteristics of school intakes Too much testing can prematurely label children as ‘failures’ Not all subjects covered by these tests which could penalise students who are better at other things
54
Criticisms of the national curriculum?
Doesn’t have to be taught in independent schools and is different in Scotland and NI (academies can adjust) ‘Minority’ subjects (drama, dance, arts, music, etc.) forced to compete Political interference in what’s taught in schools Strongly academic content, not suitable for all pupils
55
Criticisms of league tables?
Doesn’t take into account socio-economic intakes Statistics contained in ‘league tables’ can be manipulated (attendance figures, challenged grades aren’t taken into account)
56
Criticisms of the ‘new vocationalism’?
Marxists argue its an attempt to blame the education system for the failure of British businesses in the 70s and 80s Real divide in training available Young people on vocational training aren’t registered as unemployed Feminists say it has reinforced traditional gender roles Training people doesn’t create jobs and may result in the temporary storage of young people
57
Criticisms of change in education?
Good exam results = over-subscribed schools and other schools loose pupils and money Only a few CTCs were created so much parents couldn’t send their children there CTCs and GM schools run a selection system Open enrolment hasn’t give more choice (limited numbers, catchment) Middle-class pupils have benefited as their parents can ‘play the system’ Education market, and like all market, the result is inequality
58
What does Miriam David (1993) say about marketisation?
It establishes a parentocracy (parents are in charge of the education system)
59
What are some of the commentary and research evidence about marketisation?
``` Stephen Ball (1994) and Geoff Whitty (1998) formula funding and league tables cause inequalities Will Bartlett (1993) good league table ranking encourages cream-skimming and silt-shifting Sharon Gerwitz (1995) middle class parents understand and can manipulate the school system better than working class parents ```
60
What are cream skimming and silt shifting?
Cream skimming - selecting higher ability students who gain the best results and cost less to teach. Silt-shifting – offloading students which learning difficulties who are expensive and get poor results.
61
When was privatisation introduced and what ideology is it driven by?
1979 | Neoliberal
62
What is privatisation?
Services owned by the state are transferred to the private sector
63
Ball and Youdell (2007) on privatisation?
Privatisation of education | Privatisation in education
64
How has privatisation changed the way schools are run?
Have the values and practices of a business including: - local management of schools (fewer external control) - competition between schools for students (more money for more students) - performance related pay for teachers - consumer (parent) choice of schools - independently managed schools
65
What aspects of education provision formerly run by state are now run by private-profit making businesses?
- schools services (administration staff, maintenance, catering, supply teachers, etc.) - management of schools (privately managed chains of administrative schools) - running the examination system (Edexcel run by Pearson PLC, publishing company)
66
Advantages of privatisation?
More efficient schools More choice for parents Private companies can intervene and improve schools in areas where education is of poor quality
67
Disadvantages of privatisation?
Money drained from the education system Cherry-picking (projects must have ‘appeal’) What if mis-management occurs Privatisation not a guarantee of quality (2014 Ofsted stopped using private contractors to carry out school inspections) Equality and quality of education under threat (educational triage formed (Gillborn and Youdell (2000)))
68
What are PISA rankings?
OECD's Programme for International Student Assessment (15 year olds) UK Ranking 2021 - joint 11th (7.8 out of 10) Top three - Singapore (9.1), Iceland (8.4),
69
What are TIMSS rankings?
Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study UK ranking - 7th (Northern Ireland, 8th England) Top three - Singapore, Hong Kong SAR, Republic of Korea
70
What are PIRLS ranking?
Progress in International Reading Literacy Study UK ranking - joint 8th Top three - Russian Federation, Singapore, Hong Kong SAR
71
Positives of globalisation?
Access to global markets (textbooks, foreign students, education systems, etc.)
72
Positives of globalisation on policy?
They provide information about what works educationally to help all students (Michael Gove) It holds education systems to account and can spur reform (Germany’s PISA-shock 2001)
73
Negatives of globalisation of educational policy?
You can ‘game’ the system (PISA practice booklets, etc.) It only tests a narrowed curricula (misses art, etc.) and emphasises maths and English are required for success Encourages copy-paste education systems in countries where the cultures don’t match Ignores teachers effect on achievement Privatisation of education is driven by profit, not ‘moral goals of human development’ Politicians miss information on equality and equity Doesn’t take into account any extra tutoring, etc.