Educational Policy Flashcards
(56 cards)
summarise the main 2 aims of educational policies
main 2 aims of educational policies
- to improve equality: some policies are made to try and make things more equal
- marketisation: to create competition in order to improve standards and give parents more choice
outline the timeline of the British Government
- Conservative 1988-1997
- Labour 1997-2010
- Coalition 2010-2015
- Conservative 2015-2024
give context of education before the 1870 education act
- only a small minority received formal education
- public + grammar schools educated children of the wealthy and powerful
outline the tripartite system under the 1944 Butler Act
there were 3 types of schools:
- grammar schools: intended for smartest pupils
- secondary modern schools: attended by most who were less academic / more practical. basic education
- technical schools: emphasised vocational training + technical skills
outline the comprehensive system + who introduced them
- introduced by Labour Gov in 1965, prioritised equal access to education
- one secondary school type for everyone to break down social class barriers
what are advantages of the comprehensive system
- no entrance exams or selection; more fair, no children labelled as ‘failures’
- are cheaper to run, schools facilitate more pupils, there are more subjects offered
what are disadvantages of the comprehensive system
- comprehensive system limits parental choice; each student goes to their nearest school, regardless of reputation
- streams in comprehensive schools recreates social divisions as the streams reflect the social class differences
- comprehensives aren’t actually socially diverse as they’re based off of local neighbourhood
outline the Functionalist view of comprehensives
- positive view of comprehensives
- they promote social integration by bringing kids of diff social classes together
- they are more meritocratic as it gives students a longer period to develop + show their abilities
outline the Marxist view of comprehensives
- critical view of comprehensives
- they aren’t meritocratic - they reproduce class inequalities generationally through labelling + streaming
- they legitimise class inequalities by making inequal achievement seem fair because failure is the fault of individuals
define marketisation in schools
- marketisation = the process of introducing market forces of consumer choice to encourage competition + raise standards in schools
which theory supports marketisation + why
- New Right
- marketization helps to raise standards + gives consumers (parents) more choice
outline David’s concept of parentocracy
- David; Parentocracy:
- ‘rule by parents’
- parents are consumer, schools are producers
- as consumers, parents can give funding to schools by sending their child there due to the Funding Formula
- this raises school competition and standards due to league tables, OFSTED, fee schools, specialist schools
what is an AO3 evaluation of David’s concept of parentocracy
- schools are the one who actually decide who gets in - not parents
outline league tables + cream skimming
- league tables include: attainment 8 score, progress 8 score (added in 2016)
- grades produced by schools are the most important aspect to consumers
- grammar/ high achieving schools have the ability to cream skim (choose the best pupils)
- working class, special education BAME pupils are less likely to be chosen
outline the funding formula
- funding formula = funding per student enrolled at the school
- leads to sink schools - poorer, lower achieving schools that have less students + money and lower results
describe Gerwitz’s concept of parental choice/ the myth of parentocracy
- there is a myth of parentocracy (the idea that parents hold the power in choosing their child’s school)
- only some parents benefit from marketisation
- there are 3 types of parents: privileged skilled choosers, semi-skilled choosers, and disconnected local choosers
describe Gerwitz’s privileged skilled choosers
privileged skilled choosers:
- middle class
- they have the economic capital (money) to access catchment areas, tutors/ resources to achieve higher, appeals for school places, pay for school transport
- they also have the cultural capital; m/c values, skills to appeal for places, skillset/knowledge of the schools admission system, enrichment, understands the process
- they use these assets to gain educational capital for their kids
describe Gerwitz’s disconnected local choosers
disconnected local choosers
- working class parents
- their chocies are restricted de to their lack of economic + cultural capital
- they lack the economic capital, cultural capital and social capital that the privileged skilled choosers have
describe Gerwitz’s semi-skilled choosers
semi-skilled choosers
- mainly working class
- unlike the disconnected local choosers, they are ambitious for their children
- but they also lacked the cultural and economic capital to fully access educational capital
outline Conservative educational policy motives 1988-1997
- under Margaret Thatcher + heavily influenced by New Right thinking
- new vocationalism = serving the needs of the industry was prioritised over equality of opportunity
- state run institutions were inefficient as they didn’t have a profit motive
- introduction of market forces creates marketisation/ competition and thus raises standards - ‘branding, advertising and selling’ - running schools like a business
outline testing and examining under the Conservatives 1988-1997
- in hopes of increasing competition, there was an increased use of testing, examination and publication of exam results
- Ball: in some aspects, the promotion of standardised testing goes against New Right thinking as they are generally ‘against imposing uniformity on schools’ and ‘value diversity’
outline the 1988 Education Reform Act (5)
- established a national curriculum + a national system of testing and assessments
- league tables
- OFSTED
- funding formula
- MATs
- the aim of this reform was to increase diversity, choice + competition/ to raise standards
what was the aim + impact of the National Curriculum
- aim: to inc diversity, choice, competition + to raise standards as people are tested on the same thing - easily comparable
- impact: gender parity; removal of gendered subject bias
what was the aim + impact of League Tables
- aim: to provide info for parents, to help them make an informed choice, to inc parentocracy
- impact: top league tables attract m/c families (privileged skilled choosers), increased competition, cream skimming