Educational Policy Flashcards
(39 cards)
What was under the 1870 education for all Act
Foster act-created ‘Elementary Schools’ where there was no Church school. Provided some free education to age 10. School compulsory 5-13 in 1880.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the 1870 Education for all act
- Advantages:First time government provided basic education. Patchwork Provision (more unified)
- Disadvantages:Still expected to pay for equiptment. Children unable to work.
What was under the 1944 Butler act?
- Creation of formal state funded education.
- Students would sit an 11+ exam and be sent to one of three schools (selection by ability)
Grammar school (25% went 1 in 4)
Secondary Technical School (vocational)
Secondary Modern School
(tripartite three layers)
Advantages of 1944 Butler act
- help working class (same oppurtunity)
- 3% pupils in grammar schools on free meals)
- meritocracy-doesnt mater what class if you work hard you can achieve
- parity of esteem all equal schools
Disadvantages of 1944 Butler act
- Ability is fixed
- low self esteem for 75% that failed
- Middle class could pay for tutors
- 3/4 Places went ot middle class kids
- August disadvantaged maturity levels
- Secondary techincal schools underfunded
What was under the 1965 comprehensives (Labour)
British Goverments backs the move to ‘comprehensive schools’ by introducing CSE (Certificate of secondary education) exams
1974:Organisation of secondary education reinstated the request that LEAs should submit plans for comprehensivisation.
Lea-Local education authorities
Advantages of 1965 Comprehensives (Labour)
- Gcse and A level results have risen in last 20 years
- Old inequalities in statues have been removed Gcses marked equally
- Offer every child a diverse curriculum with free exams
Disadvantages og 1965 Comprehensives (Labour)
- Smartness levels mixed
- Bullying because of mixed abilities
- Focused on where you live, Poor neighborhoods lower ability.
What was Under the 1988 Education reform act
- Parents given more choice over which schools to send their children to. Open enrolment and formula funding introduced.
- Schools encouraged to compete for students
- League tables introduced, and OFSTED puplished reports for each school.
- Introduction of National Curriculum
- SATS Introduced at all key stages-introduced marketisation
Advantages of 1988 Education Act
- Parentocracy parents have more say
- Improved quality in schools with increasing competition
- Marketisation introduced by thatcher
Disadvantages of 1988 Education Act
- Marketisation-negative affects on mental health due to competition
- If you cant afford transport forced to go to worse school
- creates Zombie Schools ( struggiling due to declining enrollment, budget constraints, or lack of innovative leadership.)
What was under the 1997-2010 NewLabour
- Extended provision of specalist and faith schools.
- Intrducted trust schools and private finnance initatives.
- Introducted city academies to replace failing schools.
- Alevel split into AS and A2
- Tuition fees introduced to fund high educqation intially 3000 a year
- CEP Policies introducted
What are the CEP (Compensatory education policies) under new labour
- Compulsory education extended from 16-18
- Aim Higher programme-Sure start centres
- Education Action Zones
- EMA-Education maintence allowance
- Nation literacy and Numeracy Strategy introduced
Advantages of 1997-2010 New Labour
- Specialist schools can aid certain students
- Faith schools give parents more choice
- Trust schools share teacher resources
- City academies revived zombie schools
- Private finnance initative allow schools t rebuild, compulsory education avoided unemployment reduces amount of benefit claims
- Sure start centres deal with both cultural and material deprevation
- FMA payments allowed children to afford school equiptment
Disadvantages of 1997-2010 New Labour
- Specialist schools push children down a certain route.
- City academies allow schools to opt out of national curiculum causing bias opinions onto children. Trojan horse
- Tuition fees limit acsess
- EMA payments spend on other things
What was under the 2010-2015 Coalition policies
Academies Act 2010:All schools encouraged to leave local authority control and become academies. Funding controlled by themselves, and academies given control over their curriculum.
Free schools
* Set up and run by parents, teachers, faith organisations or businesses.
* Funding still controlled by state.
* Tuition fees tripled. 3000 to 9000
*
Free school meals:Reception Yr 1 and Yr2
Pupil Premium:Additonal funding for students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
(Further privatisation)
Advantages of 2010-15 Coalition policies
- Introduced free school meals
- Control curriculum priotise spending have more control
- localised curriculum.
Disadvantages of 2010-15 coalition policies
- Chance of corruption
- no checks on teaching
- Putting education in businesses hands
- parentocracy
What was under Conservative policies
- 100 Free schools a year, no new places in schools rated poorly by ofsted
- Universities that charge maximum fees must sponsor free schools or academies. Independent Schools to sponsor academies or state schools.
- Life ban on selective schools (grammar)
- knowledge rich curriculum (times tables)
- Increase budget for schools by £4 billion by 2022
- Scrap infant free school meals-instead all primaries to offer a free school breakfast to all.
- School policies listed elsewhere in manifesto (british values/first aid training)
Advantages 2015 Conservative policies
- Reduced entry for unis by sponsored schools
- fairer ways of measuring schools success
Disadvantages of 2015 Conservative Policies
- Zombie schools continue
- British values may lead to racism
- first aid training, mental health training not recieved
- Austerity and funding cuts continue average 8%
What does Stephen Ball (1994) and Geoff Whitty (1998) say about marketisation
Stephen Ball and Geoff Whitty note how marketisation policies such as exam league tables and the funding formula** reproduce class inequalities by creating in equalities between schools.**
What does Miriam David (1993) think about marketisation
Miriam David describes marketisation of education as ‘parentocracy’ (ruled by parents).
Supporters of marketisation argue that in a education market, power shifts away from the producers (teachers and schools) to consumers (parents). They claim that this encourages diversity among schools, gives parents more choice and raise standards.
What does Will Bartlett (1993) believe about marketisation
The policy of publishing eachothers exam results and league tables results in (a reproduction of social class inequalities)
Cream skimming:Good schools can be selective, choose their own customers and recruit high achieving mainly middle class pupils. as a result these pupils gain advantage.
Silt-shifting: Good schools can avoid taking less able pupils who are likely to get poor results and damage league table positions.