Ego and Consciousness (Jung) Flashcards
(89 cards)
What is consciousness, according to Jung?
It is awareness, and can be visualized as a field upon which the ego is centered. Consciousness is thus broader than the ego—it is basically the state of being awake, aware of what is going on in the world and within.
What does Jung mean by the “ego”?
Jung defines the ego as follows: “It forms, as it were, the centre of the field of consciousness; and, in so far as this comprises the empirical personality, the ego is the subject of all personal acts of consciousness.” Consciousness is a “field,” and what Jung calls the “empirical personality” here is our personality as we are aware of it and experience it firsthand. The ego, as “the subject of all personal acts of consciousness,” occupies the center of this field. The term ego refers to one’s experience of oneself as a center of willing, desiring, reflecting, and acting.
Why is the ego necessary for consciousness?
Because, as Jung put it, no content can be conscious unless it is represented to a subject. In this sense, the ego is like a mirror in which the psyche can see itself and become aware. The degree to which a psychic content is taken up and reflected by the ego is the degree to which it can be said to belong to the realm of consciousness.
How does Jung distinguish the conscious from the unconscious?
The unconscious is not simply the unknown, but the unknown psychic. Conscious psychic materials are those that are reflected in the ego and subject to further examination and manipulation, while other psychic contents lie outside of consciousness, either temporarily or permanently.
What makes up the bulk of the psyche, according to Jung?
The unconscious. He saw ego consciousness as analogous to a little island upon a vast ocean of the unconscious, much of which had never been explored.
Can consciousness be separated from its contents (e.g. the things of which one is conscious)?
In theory, yes—though for most of us the two are so interweaved that we cannot conceptualize, let alone experience, a pure “consciousness” as distinct from the specific thoughts and stimuli which are subject to consciousness, and so becomes identified with consciousness. Certain states of meditation seem to make such awareness of “pure consciousness” possible, however. Still, for most people, consciousness without a stable object to ground it seems to be an exceedingly ephemeral and transparent thing.
What powers does the ego have over psychic material?
To a large extent, it determines what remains in consciousness, and what drops away into unconsciousness. It can “repress” contents it finds intolerably painful or incompatible with other contents, and it can also retrieve contents from psychic storage (e.g. memory) so long as (a) they are not blocked by defense mechanisms, such as repression, which keeps intolerable contents out of reach, and (b) they have a strong enough associative connection to the ego—e.g. they are “learned” strong enough.
How are the contents of consciousness connected?
They are connected through a network of associations, all of which are linked directly or indirectly to the ego, which is the center of consciousness by geographically and dynamically, an energy center that moves psychic contents around and arranges them in orders of priority.
How is the ego the “individualizing” agent in human consciousness?
It is the seat of decision-making and free-will, and is the stable element through which psychic material passes. It is also what allows us to defy our instincts and do engage in purposeful action.
What characterizes a “strong” ego?
It is one that can obtain and move around in a deliberate way large amounts of psychic content. It is also able to identify and defy instincts and integrate psychic material in purposeful ways.
What characterizes a “weak” ego?
It is one that easily succumbs to instincts and emotions, is easily distracted and overcome by psychic content. As a result the ego lacks focus, consistent motivation, and fails to grapple effectively with the psychic content that enters consciousness.
Is it possible for the ego to be entirely passive?
Maybe for short periods of time, but the ego (and wider psyche) has a tendency to become involved in whatever is being observed. We see this in movies, for example, as the viewer quickly becomes emotionally identified with the hero. The ego, once activated, becomes a center of wishing, hoping, intending, and finally acting.
What limits the ego’s freedom?
It is easily influenced by both internal psychic and external environmental stimuli. The ego may respond to a threatening stimulus by taking up arms and defending itself; or it may be activated and stimulated by an interior urge to create, or to love, or to seek revenge. It may also respond to an ego-impulse—that is, narcissistically.
Does the ego change over time?
While the ego goes through profound changes in the course of a lifetime—particularly in cognition, self-knowledge, psychosocial identity, competence, etc., there also seems to be a continuity of ego through the course of one’s lifetime. We still seem to be the same “I” that we were as children, even if much about us has changed.
What distinguishes human consciousness from that of animals?
At least as far as we know, animals lack the self-mirroring capacities of human beings, which are enabled partly through human language but also through other powerful facets of the ego. If animals do have an ego, they seem to have much less of one than human beings.
What is an ego impulse?
These are urges or drives that come from the conscious part of the mind, as distinct from those that stem from the unconscious. Ego impulses are driven by a person’s conscious desires, goals, and sense of self. Examples might include an urge to work hard to achieve a good goal, to seek revenge after a personal slight, or acting in ways that reinforce one’s desired appearance to others.
How does culture influence and shape the ego?
According to Jung, after a certain point in development, the human ego and human consciousness become largely defined and shaped by the cultural world in which the person grows up and becomes educated. This is a layer, or wrapping, of ego structure that surrounds the central ego. Over time, with conditioning and experience, this “cultural layer” grows thicker and thicker. Jung refers to the innate, core ego as Personality No. 2, and one’s culturally-acquired layer of the ego as Personality No. 1.
How do some contents of ego-consciousness show more stability than others?
Certain things that are cultural artifacts, like one’s own name, for example, become staple feature of most people’s consciousness, and may even seem permanently welded to the ego. This occurs due to its habituated uses concerning the deepest places of self-feeling. Yet such artifacts are still less fixed to the ego than things like, for example, the body. People have changed their names and retained the same body, after all.
In what sense is the ego’s connection in the body unique?
While the ego is not identical with the body, the connection runs deeper than most things, including culture. Empirically just how deep the two run is up for debate. Experience seems to show that the relationship between them is complex but that they rest on seemingly different bases, referred to as the somatic and the psychic. For Jung, the ego is based in the body only in the sense that it experiences unity with the body, but the body that the ego experiences is psychic: it is a body image, and not the body itself.
What are endosomatic perceptions?
These are what one can consciously feel of the body, and are produced by endosomatic stimuli—only some of which cross the threshold of consciousness. (However, the fact that they are subliminal does not necessarily mean that their status is merely physiological, any more than this would be true of psychic content).
How far can the ego penetrate into the somatic base?
It remains unclear. Trained Yogis claim to exercise very large control over somatic processes, and researchers have shown that some can change the surface temperature of their palm at will by ten or twenty degrees, but we still don’t know how far into cellular substructure the ego can penetrate. Can a trained ego shrink a cancerous tumor, for example, or effectively overcome hypertension?
What are the two major jungian thresholds concerning the psyche?
One threshold separates consciousness from the unconscious, while the second separates the psyche (both conscious and unconscious) from the somatic base. Note, however, that these are fluid boundaries, not fixed or rigid barriers.
Is the body part of the psyche?
No, not in its purely physiological dimension, though we do have a body-image that is experienced psychically.
Is the ego psychic or somatic, according to Jung?
Jung argues that the ego is purely psychic, though it is deeply connected with the soma.