Election And Referendum Flashcards
(28 cards)
makes a good system according to 1997 Labour voting system commission led by Roy Jenkins
- broad proportionality
- stable gov
- extend voter choice
- ## MP-constituent link
good voting system according to Andrew Hayward
- A multiparty system
- Votes of equal worth
FPTP pros
- normally form stable gov
- constituency rep link
- swift clear transfer of power
- limits influence of extremist parties
stable gov - pros fptp
- majority
- decisive decsions -> whip system + HOL money bill restriction -> pass budget
- respnd to political ssituations -> winter fuel Payment removal
link - fptp pros
- clear accountable
- record if they want to vote for that MP constituency
- i.e if they have low attendance/or how they voted on a particular issue
- avg. constituency approc 73,000
fptp pros - swift transfer of power
Normally the result of a General Election is clear by the very next morning.
- usually 10pm and the Exit Polls are announced.
- there is usually not a series of complex negotiations to form a coalition, as often happens under proportional systems.
- 2nd May 1997 John Major left Downing Street at 11.25 and Tony Blair arrived as the new Prime Minister at 13.00
- simple: 2019 only 0.37% invalid
limit extreme parties
- 2010 when the British National Party won 2.0% of the national vote.
- best constituency result was to finish in third place in Barking.
- European Elections in 2009, which use the proportional system, the BNP won two seats.
fptp cons
- elective dictatorship
- penalise smaller parties
- ‘wasted votes’
- gov w.out clear mandate
- encourages tactical votes
elective dictatorship
- fusion of powers
- executive ltd scrutiny
- Blair in 1997 (179), 2001 (166) and Boris Johnson with 80 in 2019, Starmer 2024 (174)
penalise smaller parties
- green and reform 21% vote and 2 % ss
- wasted votes
74% of all votes were non-decisive – the second-highest rate on record, ‘surplus’ + ‘unrepresentative’
gov with out clear mandate
2024 GE labour elect on 33% of vote
tactical voting
one Ipsos poll suggested one-in-five voters intended to vote tactically for a party that was not their first preference. -> GE
stv pros
- all votes matter - counted some way -> preference -> no tactical voting -> target apathy in safe seats
- proportionate results -> lefitimacy -> i.e NIA 2022 winning party vs - 29% and ss 30%
- no safe seats
- ## choice and range
stv cons
- weaker gov - Northern Ireland where the Executive has collapsed several times, for example between 2002 and 2007 and between 2017 and 2020.
- size - difficult to represent
-more complex - donkey voting - less engagement - mps normally contact at election unlike fptp where constituency focus point
- slower count
sv pros
- clear mandate
- hard for extremist parties
- ## generally stable
sv cons
- significant wasted votes
- 2 party system
- tactical voting
- not all votes are equal
- Election Act 2023 means no longer used
ams pros
- broadly proportional = fairer -> whilst majorities can be formed without domination SNP’s success in Scotland which included a majority of 9 seats after the 2011 Scottish Parliamentary Election.- choice of 2 votes - more likely to feel represented
- help smaller parties -> less need for conc. support in Scotland the Greens are currently in a coalition with the SNP having won 8 regional list seats. In addition, in Wales, Plaid Cymru formed a Coalition with Labour between 2007 and 2011 after winning 15 seats.
ams cons
- 2 classes of representatives -> votes no say on who and from party list
- more complex -> harder to participate -> In 2019, there were nearly 1.1 million regional votes for the SNP which returned only 2 regional seats.- result in election of extremists
what is stv
- Nia elections
- local gov scotland and wales
- each party any # of candidates
- rank prefeerence
- lowest votes redistribute
- excess ewdistributed
what is sv
what is ams
Referendums: solve problems Disengagement
Referendums increase participation
ScotINDy Ref
+ tackle democratic deficit
Ao1: Scottish Independence referendum turnout was 85% - also enfranchised 16-17 yr olds of which 75% turned out -AV referendum 2011 saw turnout of 42%
Salient issues not nature of the vote itself
solve problems: Lack of info
- opportunity for political education between elections
-Referendums are an opportunity to educate people on political issues: Good Friday Agreement itself was widely circulated before the 1998 referendum
Media coverage and campaigning mean that citizens are engaged